Re: Board report

2012-09-12 Thread Angus Turner
portunity though and i'll glad jump in and help out by taking up release manager. I've got not a clue what it involves but i'm a pretty quick learner. Thanks Angus Turner h...@theangus.org On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Upayavira wrote: > So, are we discussing? We *need*

Re: Board report

2012-09-12 Thread Angus Turner
ng a debian package - > similar to what was done at kune.cc (which is Apache Wave fork) - > https://gitorious.org/kune/trunk/trees/master/debian > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Angus Turner wrote: > >> Hi, >> I've been a lurker on this list ever since Wave

CLA's

2012-09-12 Thread Angus Turner
Hi Wavers, In anticipation of the upcoming alpha release i'm just checking that all the people who have committed/written code have gotten a CLA signed and accepted. If not, consider this a subtle reminder :) -- Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com

Review Request: Adding final licsense headers

2012-09-12 Thread Angus Turner
/waveprotocol/wave/client/wavepanel/impl/diff/DiffControllerTest.java 1384205 /tools/eclipse.sh 1384205 /war/static/auth.css 1384205 /whitepapers/Makefile 1384205 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/diff/ Testing --- n/a Thanks, Angus Turner

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-12 Thread Angus Turner
://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/diff/ Testing --- n/a Thanks, Angus Turner

Licenses

2012-09-12 Thread Angus Turner
ging need to be done by the same person, with commit privileges. This ensures the PGP signature is the same the whole way through so Apache can be sure it's a legit release. So after i've wrangled with all the licensing stuff someone needs to carry it forward to the final step. --

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-13 Thread Angus Turner
ail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/#review11500 --- On Sept. 13, 2012, 6:22 a.m., Angus Turner wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To r

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-13 Thread Angus Turner
84205 /tools/eclipse.sh 1384205 /war/static/auth.css 1384205 /whitepapers/Makefile 1384205 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/diff/ Testing --- n/a Thanks, Angus Turner

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-13 Thread Angus Turner
/tools/eclipse.sh 1384205 /war/static/auth.css 1384205 /whitepapers/Makefile 1384205 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/diff/ Testing --- n/a Thanks, Angus Turner

Re: Licenses

2012-09-14 Thread Angus Turner
t. I guess the question we should be asking is do we download all our dependancies? Or just leave the ones that aren't licensed nicely to be downloaded with everything kept in the source. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Chris Mear wrote: > On 13 Sept

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-14 Thread Angus Turner
1384205 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/diff/ Testing --- n/a Thanks, Angus Turner

Re: Tests in Source Release

2012-09-14 Thread Angus Turner
Lucene seems to use SHA1 to create a binary format of junit which is OK to include in source releases. Not exactly sure how they encrypt/decrypt it yet but i'm still poking around... Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Upayavira wrote: > Look

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-24 Thread Angus Turner
sed it... I've emailed Dan Peterson as per a suggestion from Upayavira, so we'll see where that gets us re: this issue. Thanks Angus Turner h...@theangus.org On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Upayavira wrote: > I'm inclined to agree, but it would be wise for someone to subscribe to &g

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-24 Thread Angus Turner
s is sorted out. Thanks Angus Turner h...@theangus.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Angus Turner wrote: > Yeah I can do that. I'm inclined to think that they can go, as elsewhere > in the code base it's just 'Copyright 2011 Google'. It'd be great to get > the

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-24 Thread Angus Turner
So you've sent one to legal-discuss? (just confirming) On 25/09/2012, at 7:33 AM, Upayavira wrote: > Oops, just sent one there... :-) > > Let's see if we get something back. > > Upayavira > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012, at 09:28 PM, Angus Turner wrote: >>

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-25 Thread Angus Turner
I've subbed to the list and i'm watching. I tried to reply this morning but it didn't like it, maybe my phone's email is unhappy. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Yes, I have. See http://s.apache.org/qx6 for

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-25 Thread Angus Turner
7;s all good to commit when you get around to it... - Angus --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/#review11776 ---------

Re: Review Request: Adding final license headers

2012-09-25 Thread Angus Turner
I can ask him sure. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Or we ask Dan Peterson whether either he can remove them, or Google can > give us permission to remove them ourselves. > > Could you do that Angus? > > Thx, &g

Fwd: Wave Licenses

2012-09-27 Thread Angus Turner
Hi All, Just forwarding this to the list so we have a record. I'm going to start doing another mega-patch to remove all the copyright stuff and fix up anything that I missed last round. It'll be up for review hopefully within the next day or two. Thanks Angus Turner h...@th

Re: Fwd: Wave Licenses

2012-09-29 Thread Angus Turner
done :) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Upayavira wrote: > This is great, so go for it now, thanks! > > One thing, it is probably worth forwarding this to secretary@a.o and > asking whether he wishes to record this at all. > > Up

Re: Review Request: Implementing the feature "New wave with the participants of the current wave"

2012-09-29 Thread Angus Turner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7353/#review12045 --- - Angus Turner On Sept. 29, 2012, 11:53 a.m., rocklund wrote

Re: Review Request: Implementing the feature "New wave with the participants of the current wave"

2012-09-29 Thread Angus Turner
> On Sept. 30, 2012, 2:09 a.m., Angus Turner wrote: > > sorry my bad, it said 'some tests would be great if possible' - Angus --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://review

Release Update

2012-09-29 Thread Angus Turner
and we can work out whens the best time. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com

Re: Release Update

2012-09-30 Thread Angus Turner
Oops I thought I did :) My internet has been a bit stuffy lately... Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > The last review for licensing stuff is up, i'd appreciate it if you all > > looked at it and pointed out any

Re: Review Request: Implementing the feature "New wave with the participants of the current wave"

2012-09-30 Thread Angus Turner
> On Sept. 30, 2012, 2:09 a.m., Angus Turner wrote: > > > > Angus Turner wrote: > sorry my bad, it said > 'some tests would be great if possible' > > rocklund wrote: > I'm not sure if it is possible to add any testing for this since it

Re: Releasing...

2012-10-21 Thread Angus Turner
the signing. We also need to create a release page. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Where did we get to on preparing a tet release? Have we got licensing > headers in order? Does anything else stand in our way? > > Thx, > > Upayavira >

Re: Releasing...

2012-10-21 Thread Angus Turner
ll let you know. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. wrote: > I'm sorry, why is an open source project obfuscating anything? > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael MacFadden > wrote: > > Angus, > > > >

Re: Release

2012-11-18 Thread Angus Turner
Great I'll upload it now. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > > It might be easier > > to download the patch apply that and create a script that just adds the > > extra * needed everywhere. > > @Angus,

Re: Release

2012-11-18 Thread Angus Turner
It's getting there. It seems a 4.4mb patch breaks the review system though :) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Angus Turner wrote: > Great I'll upload it now. > Thanks > Angus Turner > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > > On

Re: Release

2012-11-18 Thread Angus Turner
I'll leave it for 10 minutes or so and see what happens. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > Timeout related? > > Might it be worth mentioning to infrastructure? > > Ali > > On 18 November 2012 23:17, Ang

Re: Release

2012-11-23 Thread Angus Turner
Ok all, I tried contacting infra with no luck, i'm not sure if my message didn't get through or what. I think it might be worth just creating a new review request so i'll try that next. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Angus Turner wrote

Re: Release

2012-11-23 Thread Angus Turner
Seems it is indeed something on the reviewboard side. Anyone know where we should go with this? Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Angus Turner wrote: > Ok all, > I tried contacting infra with no luck, i'm not sure if my message didn't

Re: Release

2012-11-24 Thread Angus Turner
Ok so infra has basically said the practical answer is to just commit the patch, unless we want to wait for the issue to be fixed, which could be a while. So unless anyone has any problems with that I suggest you just go for it Ali. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sun, Nov 25, 2012

Re: Review Request: fixed failed tests in AttachmentStoreTest

2012-11-28 Thread Angus Turner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8254/#review13834 --- No obvious errors to me, looks good. - Angus Turner On Nov. 28

Re: "Obfuscating' 3rd party jars

2012-12-03 Thread Angus Turner
r suggestions to fix the issue. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Benson, > > Yes, Angus had been working this issue for us and found a few third party > Jars. Here is an extract from

Re: "Obfuscating' 3rd party jars

2012-12-03 Thread Angus Turner
I like the idea of providing a simple script that downloads and installs the dependancies. Surely this can then be run during the ant build? Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > Emma is only used with junit to generate code coverage repo

Re: "Obfuscating' 3rd party jars

2012-12-04 Thread Angus Turner
+1 Sorry for all the confusion guys! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is probably the simples path forward. > > +1 > > On 12/4/12 11:33 AM, "Upayavira"

Re: Review Request: Adds get_third_party script to download junit and emma dependencies

2012-12-16 Thread Angus Turner
> On Dec. 16, 2012, 10:39 p.m., Ali Lown wrote: > > get_third_party.sh, line 27 > > > > > > Trying to use these, without checking for the existence of said program > > is only going to cause problems. > > > > I

Re: Documentation

2013-03-15 Thread Angus Turner
Seems you need a permission somewhere to edit the pages. Where can I get this? Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Angus Turner wrote: > Hi all, > I once again have time off, and i'm planning on spending a couple of days > trying to

Re: Documentation

2013-03-15 Thread Angus Turner
Sounds like a plan! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > Angus, > > This sounds great. Thanks for offering to start work on this. > > If you could tidy-up and include Niklaus's notes > ( > http://bashvi.tumblr

Re: Release planning

2013-05-23 Thread Angus Turner
I believe Michael had volunteered to do the signing and push the release over the line, but he seems pretty busy. There's guides on the foundation website on how to sign a release etc. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > So

Re: Review Request: Add LICENSE file, bump date in NOTICE

2013-05-23 Thread Angus Turner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11344/#review20946 --- Ship it! LGTM - Angus Turner On May 23, 2013, 12:55 p.m., Ali

Re: Design & Documentation Contributions

2013-05-24 Thread Angus Turner
s. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Justin Beals wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been lurking on this list for a little bit and am really glad to see > some activity. I thought I would chime in. I am interested in > contributing to the desig

Re: Hello

2013-05-24 Thread Angus Turner
The best way is to dig in and get coding! There's a number of issues in our JIRA, other than that we don't have a particular roadmap in mind so pick a feature that you find lacking and work on it! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:37 AM, John Blos

Re: Release planning

2013-05-24 Thread Angus Turner
Don't see a reason not to tag the release. I think we should go from 0.1, but I think it's more a personal thing. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > Ok. Do we feel happy to tag the tree now? > > What do we want to ca

Re: Hello

2013-05-25 Thread Angus Turner
g list. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, John Blossom wrote: > Michael, > > I read this one first, but respond to it secondly. > > I would encourage you to proceed with the migration. If Google support is > deprecated, then we need to mak

Re: Review Request: More release-orientated build/metadata changes

2013-05-27 Thread Angus Turner
x27;t comment inline) other than that LGTM! - Angus Turner On May 27, 2013, 10:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.a

Re: Federating with self-signed certificates

2013-05-29 Thread Angus Turner
stions that'd be great! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > > Good luck with this. It has been ~a year since I last did got it > > working happily (since nobo

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-29 Thread Angus Turner
Nothing about it not being appropriate, everything about having the man power. Right now it's hard enough to maintain the code we've got. I personally would rather wave was written in a 'nice' language like JS or Python, but right now it's not worth the effort. Tha

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-30 Thread Angus Turner
+1 for maven, happy to provide feedback on module names etc. Hopefully this helps make the code a little clearer as well... Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Pratik Paranjape wrote: > +1 Michael. I think maven will turn out to be a big necessity

Re: Maven

2013-05-30 Thread Angus Turner
Re: the cleanup point, it'd be great if you could file tickets for those errors (possibly with a patch if they're easy to fix...) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Dave wrote: > On 30/05/13 20:41, Upayavira wrote: > >> Are you ab

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-30 Thread Angus Turner
Hi Alain, A great way to start would be to look at the wiki here<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Home>. There are a number of TODOs at the top of most pages and if you could help out with those that'd be great! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 31

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-30 Thread Angus Turner
hi Whitney you can unsubscribe by sending an email to wave-dev-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Whitney Zoller wrote: > pls unsubscribe me > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: >

Re: Maven [Was: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code]

2013-05-31 Thread Angus Turner
or next release. Anything that makes the codebase easier to understand and follow is a big +1 from me Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Paulo Pires wrote: > Page where Maven module structure is discussed can be found at > https://github.com/pires/wave/w

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC2

2013-05-31 Thread Angus Turner
+1 awesome work Ali! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > It is finally time to get a release out into the world. There has been > a lot of things happen since the codebase was imported to Apache in > Febuary 2011. Whilst wor

Re: Federating with self-signed certificates

2013-05-31 Thread Angus Turner
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Federation This is the definitive guide to federation. I hope that helps Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: > Thanks for the help so far. > Today I could devote some time to it

Re: Federating with self-signed certificates

2013-06-01 Thread Angus Turner
Hey Bruno, If you could list what you needed to be changed I can add this to the wiki page for future reference. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Dave wrote: > On 01/06/13 13:28, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: > >> I have been troubleshooting seve

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC2

2013-06-03 Thread Angus Turner
Hey Ali, Maybe the easiest thing with the whitepaper and spec directories is to move them onto the wiki. seems a bit weird to have documentation like that included within a release... Once I've got them locally I'll submit a review request with those folders deleted... Thanks An

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC2

2013-06-03 Thread Angus Turner
On further inspection they contain all the stuff to build them as well, it really looks like they should be in a different repo. Or at least not included in a release. Not sure what we should do here... Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Angus Turner

Review Request: Removes requestreview

2013-06-03 Thread Angus Turner
mailing list discussion. Diffs - /request_codereview 1489182 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/diff/ Testing --- n/a Thanks, Angus Turner

Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview

2013-06-03 Thread Angus Turner
/whitepapers): > http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol. > (And whether we should have those other documents on the site as well?) > > Ali > > On 3 June 2013 23:29, Angus Turner wrote: > > Wasn't sure if I was going to include removing the white paper folders > > yet

Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview

2013-06-03 Thread Angus Turner
Note I'd be willing to set all this up if someone can give me write access to the wave-protocol site... Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Angus Turner wrote: > In moving over all the stuff to the wiki I left the protocol specs and the > whi

Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview

2013-06-03 Thread Angus Turner
Awesome, I'll make a request removing the unnecessary stuff. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand now. If you look here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/inc

Re: svn commit: r1489315 - in /incubator/wave/branches/wave-0.4-release: issue_exporter.py request_codereview spec/ whitepapers/

2013-06-04 Thread Angus Turner
We can also remove request_codereview spec and whitepapers from trunk as well Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:08 PM, wrote: > Author: al > Date: Tue Jun 4 08:08:04 2013 > New Revision: 1489315 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489315 >

Re: Wave Logo

2013-06-04 Thread Angus Turner
I know for sure we have the rights for the Open Wave one, not sure about the wiab. I personally think we should go for the openwave, and can add the trademark to it if needed. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > Christian has raised

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC2

2013-06-04 Thread Angus Turner
Attached is the logo with a tm attached. As far as RAT goes, seems to only add licence headers and we've already been through that. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Alfredo Abambres wrote: > Upayavira: Thanks for your explanation. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC3

2013-06-05 Thread Angus Turner
+1 Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > Lets try again with this then... > > Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here: > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/ > > This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0

Re: Wave Future Options

2013-06-12 Thread Angus Turner
I think we need to separate the client from the server first of all. That allows things like OT and federation to be ripped out and replaced whilst leaving the client intact and slowly changing that if need be. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Michael

Re: Wave Future Options

2013-06-12 Thread Angus Turner
Ruby. Just my 2 cents... (from someone that programs a bit, and finds python way more accessible than java) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Angus, > > I think we all agree on th

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Angus Turner
+1 to adding all the third party .jars to an ant task. There's a tonne of them in there, and it's hard to keep track of what licence what library is under. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 201

Re: Issue with Eclipse project

2013-06-21 Thread Angus Turner
Sounds like a good plan, especially since we have most of the code just sitting there in a git repo. We've been talking abou it for ages and seems like now is the time to actually do it! Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Michael MacF

Re: John's Wiki Permissions

2013-06-27 Thread Angus Turner
Hey Michael, Wondering if its possible to give someone else admin to the wiki so you don't have to do it all the time... On 6/28/13, Michael MacFadden wrote: > John, > > I have given you wiki permissions! > > ~Michael > > > -- Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com

Re: John's Wiki Permissions

2013-06-28 Thread Angus Turner
I'm not a PMC but I could just see that as a way to further help out. Nevermind :) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Angus Turner > wrote: > > Hey Michael, > > Wonde

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC4

2013-08-31 Thread Angus Turner
You forgot to change the vote closing date, unless time travel was part of this release :) Thanks Angus Turner h...@theangus.org On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > The time has finally come, after many weeks of anticipation: RC4 is > now available for review. > > M

Re: Wave Kickstarter

2013-11-30 Thread Angus Turner
tentious part of all, I don't think I'd want to call > it wave. But it really would be the grandchild of what we've been > working on all this time. > > Thats my thoughts. If anyone has any ideas, I'm all ears. As I say, > I'm keen to build this, but I'm too old to live on ramen in a granny > shack. This thing we've been working toward has real value, and could > be put to great effect if we can actually make it good. > > -J > > > > [1] https://crypto.cat/documents/report-1213.pdf > https://www.opentechfund.org/ > -- Thanks Angus Turner e: h...@theangus.org m: 0424972516

Re: Incubation status

2013-12-01 Thread Angus Turner
A wiki page or a new thread might be better for this - kind of off topic... Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > ok, svn checkout; > > Note #1: Get an > "Error validating server certificate for https://svn.apache.o

Re: Incubation status

2013-12-01 Thread Angus Turner
this it'd be great to document it somewhere like the wiki.. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > ora wave? ;) > It is sort-of on-topic to the earlier discussion as to "how to get more > activity". But

Re: Incubation status

2013-12-01 Thread Angus Turner
It is quite a large repo :) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > No problem, at the moment its still checking out. > I'll note down any other issues other then those two as I get any. > (Actually still on

Re: [VOTE] To stay or not to stay

2013-12-10 Thread Angus Turner
ed to us. So my (community) vote is to stay. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Upayavira wrote: > As I'm sure you can imagine, I've been thinking about this quite a bit > recently. If a project still has some life (and Wave does), re

Re: [VOTE] Move Wave to a true 'git' repository at Apache

2013-12-13 Thread Angus Turner
Move to git Thanks Angus Turner e: h...@theangus.org m: 0424972516 On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > As one of the main contention points, lets get Wave moved off the > git-svn life support, and in to a true git repository. > Since this would affect everyone (e

Re: Python client API

2015-04-07 Thread Angus Turner
I'm inclined to +1 this. Part of the reason wave is so hard to adopt is there's just so much code, some of it just remnant of the code dump Google did. Removing this is a step towards cleaning up! Thanks Angus Turner e: h...@theangus.org On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Yuri Z wr

Re: static code analysis

2016-01-04 Thread Angus Turner
Is there a way to get an account to mark issues as closed, won't fix etc? Briefly having a look there's a heap of errors that are in depedancies/minified code which should be marked as 'won't fix' to make it look a little better, happy to do a bit of triage...