Awesome, I'll make a request removing the unnecessary stuff. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand now. If you look here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/ > > You can see that the site has its own repo. We could easily make a repo > call whitepapers or something to that effect, which would contain the > source and build files. We can then built them and post them to the site > somewhere. We can figure out the details. For now, since they are on the > wave-protocol site, I would simply remove them from out main source repo. > > ~Michael > > From: Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > Date: Monday, June 3, 2013 7:31 PM > To: Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> > Cc: Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > > Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview > > I was going to leave the protocol and whitepaper stuff on the > wave-protocol site, as they are formatted nicely there and that really is > protocol stuff that should be separate from WIAB. I was going to suggest a > github repo to keep the make files for this seperate from WIAB once again. > > I don't have any preferences, just I think that those files should be > located outside of the release repo. There is also another folder which is > docs/ which contains the images for the various tutorials which are now > located on the wiki, not sure what we wanted to do with that either. > > Thanks > Angus Turner > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Michael MacFadden < > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am following this. My on question was the part about a git hub repo. >> What was that for. >> >> My opinion would be, let's just move everything over to the wave site. >> Once it is all there, then I will take down the wave protocol stuff. I >> would rather have it duplicated until we are happy with the new site. >> >> ~Michael >> >> On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >> > Michael, >> > >> > I believe you are the one in control of the wave-protocol site >> currently. >> > >> > Comments on this? >> > >> > Thanks. >> > Ali >> > >> > On 3 June 2013 23:41, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Note I'd be willing to set all this up if someone can give me write >> access >> >> to the wave-protocol site... >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Angus Turner >> >> angusisf...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> In moving over all the stuff to the wiki I left the protocol specs >> and the >> >>> whitepapers on the protocol website. Maybe we need someone with commit >> >>> access to that site to leave all the protocol stuff up and delete the >> rest, >> >>> and create a github repo or something to host the build files. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> Angus Turner >> >>> angusisf...@gmail.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Yes, we can move spec/ and whitepapers/ to the website if that is >> better. >> >>>> >> >>>> You might want to consider how they sat on the waveprotocol site >> >>>> (along with some other documents not included in spec/whitepapers): >> >>>> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol. >> >>>> (And whether we should have those other documents on the site as >> well?) >> >>>> >> >>>> Ali >> >>>> >> >>>> On 3 June 2013 23:29, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Wasn't sure if I was going to include removing the white paper >> folders >> >>>>> yet. Just a sudden brainwave. Can we include those folders in the >> >>>>> website repo? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone >> >>>>> From: Ali Lown >> >>>>> Sent: 4/06/2013 7:40 AM >> >>>>> To: Angus Turner; Ali Lown; wave >> >>>>> Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> >>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/#review21362 >> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Ship it! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks for this, though you didn't really need to file a >> >>>>> review-request for since, since I was just going to do it when I >> next >> >>>>> went to work on the release. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - Ali Lown >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Angus Turner wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> >>>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/ >> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> (Updated June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m.) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Review request for wave. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Description >> >>>>>> ------- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Removes requestreview as per mailing list discussion. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Diffs >> >>>>>> ----- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> /request_codereview 1489182 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/diff/ >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Testing >> >>>>>> ------- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> n/a >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Angus Turner >> >> >> > >
