The apache licence is compatible to varying degrees to other licences. Some are only allowed to be included when they've been obfuscated to prevent easy tinkering. I can't find it at the moment but there is a page on the apache website which explains it better. If I can find it I'll let you know. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. <w...@0x1b.com> wrote: > I'm sorry, why is an open source project obfuscating anything? > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael MacFadden > <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Angus, > > > > In regards to obfuscation. You might take a look at ProGuard: > > > > http://proguard.sourceforge.net/index.html# > > > > It's an open source obfuscator. > > > > And yep. I'll help with the final signing. > > > > ~Michael > > > > From: Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > > Reply-To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > > Date: Sunday, October 21, 2012 12:58 PM > > To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: Releasing... > > > > Sorry i'm the hold up. My script that I used to remove the copyright > > headers changed all the comments to not being javadocs anymore. I've been > > busy lately and haven't had time to fix it. > > > > The next step is working out how to obfuscate the jars in a couple of the > > libraries to make them compatible with the apache licence. If anyone has > > any experience in this any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > After that it's a matter of getting all the release documentation sorted, > > and then signing and packaging everything and I believe Micheal agreed to > > be the one to finish off all the signing. We also need to create a > release > > page. > > Thanks > > Angus Turner > > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> Where did we get to on preparing a tet release? Have we got licensing > >> headers in order? Does anything else stand in our way? > >> > >> Thx, > >> > >> Upayavira > >> > > > > > > >
