Ok, the suggested release is here -
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.5-incubating/
Please review the changes for rc 0.5 at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/pull/3
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Thanks
> Anyway, I created an issue for infra to c
Thanks
Anyway, I created an issue for infra to create release folders for Wave in
the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release
and https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> The people.apache.org
The people.apache.org space I was using is just my 'personal' webspace.
You can put things in your public_html folder on that machine. (Ssh in as
you would expect).
Regards,
Ali
On 18 Jul 2014 10:23, "Yuri Z" wrote:
> @Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file
> int
@Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file
into a folder at people.apache.org and make it available for other via web
interface. Is there some guide how to do this?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> Ok
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown wr
Ok
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest
> rerunning.
>
> Ali
> On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" wrote:
>
>> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
>> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown wro
I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest
rerunning.
Ali
On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" wrote:
> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
> > RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
> >
> > Ali
Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
>
> Ali
> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>
>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2
RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
Ali
On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" wrote:
> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Although I have been dormant.
Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the release
> in any way possible. If you need some one to go through t
All,
Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the release
in any way possible. If you need some one to go through the release and
test it. Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready let me know.
I haven¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute.
~Michael
Yuri,
AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now.
Thanks,
Ali
On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z wrote:
> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and later to add
> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be automated. Off
> course if someone want to help with
Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and later to add
a release job to jenkins so the release process will be automated. Off
course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would be great :)
The wiki contains two todos:
1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-V
Yuri,
I started writing up the 'procedure' here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure It
needs updating now that we use git rather than svn.
If we could get jenkins building the releases that would be great!
(wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src relea
Thanks for update Ali.
I think the release is important to show that we handled all the copyright
issues, so I would prefer just to release as is and then add the patch
later.
Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc 05. Are there any scripts
that should be run? What is the procedure?
By th
RC4 was merged back in to master around January, and development has
continued in master from there..
I don't recall any major show stoppers with RC4. A look at the vote
thread suggests that the only problems left to discuss were the images
in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find no copyrig
I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master a while ago. But I don't remember
what were the issues that prevented from us to release rc 0.4.
@Ali, so you remember what were the issues?
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> before quite a while, we were discussi
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 09:46 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Today's update:
> - Created a wave-0.4-release branch
> - Created CHANGES
> - Written RELEASE-NOTES
> - Ensured they are in new builds
> - Ensured version number is correct
> - Tagged wave-0.4-rc1.
>
> So, we are now even closer... ;)
Yay. Ge
Today's update:
- Created a wave-0.4-release branch
- Created CHANGES
- Written RELEASE-NOTES
- Ensured they are in new builds
- Ensured version number is correct
- Tagged wave-0.4-rc1.
So, we are now even closer... ;)
Ali
Anything under 1.0. Could be 0.4.0 if that makes semver fans happier :-)
Upayavira
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 03:10 PM, John Blossom - Shore Communications
Inc. wrote:
> You can argue it either way, it really comes down to how you want to
> position the new architecture. If Yuri's comfortable with
You can argue it either way, it really comes down to how you want to
position the new architecture. If Yuri's comfortable with 0.4, then I am. J
Since we are having a discussion about what specific version number the
release should be, I think we are not using semantic version at the moment.
Semantic versioning does not depend on political or cultural issues, just
on API retrocompatibility, which is not subject to opinions. Following
semver
I agree that a anything below 1.0 sends the right message AFAIK.
Novice question (similar to Dave's - but didn't saw an answer): does Apache
Wave versioning uses the http://semver.org/ "standard"? Or will use?
Thanks.
http://alfredo.abambres.com
*"Moving, always moving, and living inside mov
0.4 is fine with me
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I agree that 1.0 would give the wrong message. Some <1.0 version is
> right.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:49 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > >> Blockers:
> > >> What version number should this be? The code is maki
I agree that 1.0 would give the wrong message. Some <1.0 version is
right.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:49 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> >> Blockers:
> >> What version number should this be? The code is making reference to
> >> waveinabox 0.3. (Was 0.1, 0.2 ever released?). If we use 0.4 as our
Great to see you are heading towards a release.
I would like to mention if you would build with Maven, there is a lot
of these release steps prepared with the so called "apache parent".
It's a parent pom which helps to create release candidates etc.
I saw you are going with ant, so I would like t
I have no problem signing, I would like to do SOMETHING to help out. I
can make the time.
~Michael
On 5/24/13 6:28 AM, "Angus Turner" wrote:
>Don't see a reason not to tag the release. I think we should go from 0.1,
>but I think it's more a personal thing.
>
>Thanks
>Angus Turner
>angusisf...@
Don't see a reason not to tag the release. I think we should go from 0.1,
but I think it's more a personal thing.
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Ok. Do we feel happy to tag the tree now?
>
> What do we want to call this release? (I
Ok. Do we feel happy to tag the tree now?
What do we want to call this release? (I assume <1, since we don't feel it
is completely stable yet. See:
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-versioning
)
@Michael: Are you still happy to do signing?
Ali
On 23 May 20
I believe Michael had volunteered to do the signing and push the release
over the line, but he seems pretty busy. There's guides on the foundation
website on how to sign a release etc.
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> So The list
I ll make a bash script to download the jars
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Great! Thx,
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, at 07:19 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> > Yes. That should be our first step. I will add a patch to add the txt
> > file and remove the jars.
> >
Great! Thx,
Upayavira
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, at 07:19 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> Yes. That should be our first step. I will add a patch to add the txt
> file and remove the jars.
>
> ~Michael
>
> On Dec 16, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > Emma and junit are build time requiremen
Yes. That should be our first step. I will add a patch to add the txt file and
remove the jars.
~Michael
On Dec 16, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Emma and junit are build time requirements, anyone building code can
> follow instructions.
>
> We should get a release out with a text fi
Emma and junit are build time requirements, anyone building code can
follow instructions.
We should get a release out with a text file saying, "download Emma and
junit from here:xyz".
You never know, someone might download it, then offer a patch to
automate the download. But if you don't release,
Great, thanks Ali!
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> I took another look over the resultant diff and found a few typos from
> when I corrected some merge errors (a ':w' from vim for example).
>
> The whole project compiles properly now, and the test suite all pases.
>
> I have
I took another look over the resultant diff and found a few typos from
when I corrected some merge errors (a ':w' from vim for example).
The whole project compiles properly now, and the test suite all pases.
I have committed this as r1413353. Hopefully this is now all of the
licensing stuff sorte
Ok so infra has basically said the practical answer is to just commit the
patch, unless we want to wait for the issue to be fixed, which could be a
while. So unless anyone has any problems with that I suggest you just go
for it Ali.
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012
sign on to #asfinfra on freenode, and ask there, if you can.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012, at 09:10 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Seems it is indeed something on the reviewboard side. Anyone know where
> we
> should go with this?
> Thanks
> Angus Turner
> angusisf...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 2
Seems it is indeed something on the reviewboard side. Anyone know where we
should go with this?
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Ok all,
> I tried contacting infra with no luck, i'm not sure if my message didn't
> get through or wh
Ok all,
I tried contacting infra with no luck, i'm not sure if my message didn't
get through or what. I think it might be worth just creating a new review
request so i'll try that next.
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Angus Turner wrote:
> I'll leave i
I'll leave it for 10 minutes or so and see what happens.
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Timeout related?
>
> Might it be worth mentioning to infrastructure?
>
> Ali
>
> On 18 November 2012 23:17, Angus Turner wrote:
> > It's gettin
Timeout related?
Might it be worth mentioning to infrastructure?
Ali
On 18 November 2012 23:17, Angus Turner wrote:
> It's getting there. It seems a 4.4mb patch breaks the review system though
> :)
> Thanks
> Angus Turner
> angusisf...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Angus T
It's getting there. It seems a 4.4mb patch breaks the review system though
:)
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Great I'll upload it now.
> Thanks
> Angus Turner
> angusisf...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Ali
Great I'll upload it now.
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > It might be easier
> > to download the patch apply that and create a script that just adds the
> > extra * needed everywhere.
>
> @Angus, do you want to submit the new patch
FWDing, back onto the list...
On 18 November 2012 20:07, Angus Turner wrote:
> Yeah sorry guys this is my bad.
> I've been having computer troubles recently with things failing left right
> and centre and it seems the script was lost, as it wasn't put into my back
> up because at the time I didn't
> Are we still stalled on the release process?
We appear to be.
>The last I remember we were talking about obfuscating third party jars. Are
>we still at that point?
Yes. Regarding this: it is unclear if we should make the obfuscation
part of the normal build process, or only include it in a '
Oops I thought I did :)
My internet has been a bit stuffy lately...
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > The last review for licensing stuff is up, i'd appreciate it if you all
> > looked at it and pointed out any errors i've made.
>
>
> The last review for licensing stuff is up, i'd appreciate it if you all
> looked at it and pointed out any errors i've made.
I can't see it in my 'incoming reviews' section.
I did find it eventually (https://reviews.apache.org/r/7363/), and it
appears you didn't add any groups for the review.
I
47 matches
Mail list logo
