The people.apache.org space I was using is just my 'personal' webspace. You can put things in your public_html folder on that machine. (Ssh in as you would expect).
Regards, Ali On 18 Jul 2014 10:23, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file > into a folder at people.apache.org and make it available for other via web > interface. Is there some guide how to do this? > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Yuri Zelikov <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok > > On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest > > > rerunning. > > > > > > Ali > > > On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered? > > >> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > >> > > >>> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive. > > >>> > > >>> Ali > > >>> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > >>>> michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> All, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the > > >> release > > >>>>> in any way possible. If you need some one to go through the > release > > >> and > > >>>>> test it. Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready let me > > >> know. > > >>>>> I haven¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ~Michael > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 7/12/14, 6:05 AM, "Ali Lown" <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Yuri, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>> Ali > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and > later > > >> to > > >>>>>>> add > > >>>>>>> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be > automated. > > >> Off > > >>>>>>> course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would be > > great > > >>>> :) > > >>>>>>> The wiki contains two todos: > > >>>>>>> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id as > > well? > > >>>>>>> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies. > (Unknown > > >>>>>>> currently whether we need an ECCN or not) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right? > > >>>>>>> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Yuri, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here: > > >>>>>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure > > >>>> It > > >>>>>>>> needs updating now that we use git rather than svn. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that would be > great! > > >>>>>>>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src releases?) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent), then > the > > >>>>>>>> next step is to manually verify the contents are as expected, > and > > to > > >>>>>>>> sign it. > > >>>>>>>> I have a very small script to sign all the files using my key, > and > > >> to > > >>>>>>>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files: > > >> http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to vote upon... > > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list to vote upon... > > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, release! ;) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Ali > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for update Ali. > > >>>>>>>>> I think the release is important to show that we handled all > the > > >>>>>>>> copyright > > >>>>>>>>> issues, so I would prefer just to release as is and then add > the > > >>>>>>>> patch > > >>>>>>>>> later. > > >>>>>>>>> Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc 05. Are there > > any > > >>>>>>>> scripts > > >>>>>>>>> that should be run? What is the procedure? > > >>>>>>>>> By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to create the release > > >>>>>>>> artifact > > >>>>>>>> - > > >>>>>>>>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/ > > >>>>>>>>> So, if could to automate the licenses verification and signing > we > > >>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>> release just by running the job in Jenkins... > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> RC4 was merged back in to master around January, and > development > > >>>> has > > >>>>>>>>>> continued in master from there.. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I don't recall any major show stoppers with RC4. A look at the > > >>>> vote > > >>>>>>>>>> thread suggests that the only problems left to discuss were > the > > >>>>>>>> images > > >>>>>>>>>> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find no copyright > > >>>>>>>>>> assignment. But we fixed this problem in 48c3bc9, by changing > > the > > >>>>>>>>>> thumbnails to some we could attribute. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On a meta level, the problem at the time was that RC4 had a > very > > >>>>>>>> poor > > >>>>>>>>>> vote turnout, disincentivizing further work. > > >>>>>>>>>> (And on a personal level, I ran out of time I could put > towards > > >>>>>>>> Wave) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I don't think there is anything stopping us putting together > RC5 > > >>>>>>>> over > > >>>>>>>>>> this weekend. > > >>>>>>>>>> (Since we would want to take from current master, a check of > the > > >>>>>>>>>> licenses will be required to be redone). > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Is there interest in RC5? > > >>>>>>>>>> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch patches in?) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master a while ago. But I > > don't > > >>>>>>>> remember > > >>>>>>>>>>> what were the issues that prevented from us to release rc > 0.4. > > >>>>>>>>>>> @Ali, so you remember what were the issues? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian Grobmeier < > > >>>>>>>>>> grobme...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> before quite a while, we were discussing a release. It's > still > > >>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>> there, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and I would like to know what the actual problem is. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As you know, releases are considered a sign of a healthy > > >>>> project > > >>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> incubator. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's currently discussed within the IPMC why projects which > > >>>> don't > > >>>>>>>> manage > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to make a release > > >>>>>>>>>>>> after a year should stay in the incubator. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Christian > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @grobmeier > > >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
