All, Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the release in any way possible. If you need some one to go through the release and test it. Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready let me know. I haven¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute.
~Michael On 7/12/14, 6:05 AM, "Ali Lown" <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >Yuri, > >AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now. > >Thanks, >Ali > >On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and later to >>add >> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be automated. Off >> course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would be great :) >> The wiki contains two todos: >> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id as well? >> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies. (Unknown >> currently whether we need an ECCN or not) >> >> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right? >> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment? >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> Yuri, >>> >>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure It >>> needs updating now that we use git rather than svn. >>> >>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that would be great! >>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src releases?) >>> >>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent), then the >>> next step is to manually verify the contents are as expected, and to >>> sign it. >>> I have a very small script to sign all the files using my key, and to >>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files: http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1 >>> >>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to vote upon... >>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list to vote upon... >>> Once that is done, release! ;) >>> >>> Ali >>> >>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Thanks for update Ali. >>> > I think the release is important to show that we handled all the >>> copyright >>> > issues, so I would prefer just to release as is and then add the >>>patch >>> > later. >>> > Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc 05. Are there any >>> scripts >>> > that should be run? What is the procedure? >>> > By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to create the release >>>artifact >>> - >>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/ >>> > So, if could to automate the licenses verification and signing we >>>could >>> > release just by running the job in Jenkins... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> > >>> >> RC4 was merged back in to master around January, and development has >>> >> continued in master from there.. >>> >> >>> >> I don't recall any major show stoppers with RC4. A look at the vote >>> >> thread suggests that the only problems left to discuss were the >>>images >>> >> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find no copyright >>> >> assignment. But we fixed this problem in 48c3bc9, by changing the >>> >> thumbnails to some we could attribute. >>> >> >>> >> On a meta level, the problem at the time was that RC4 had a very >>>poor >>> >> vote turnout, disincentivizing further work. >>> >> (And on a personal level, I ran out of time I could put towards >>>Wave) >>> >> >>> >> I don't think there is anything stopping us putting together RC5 >>>over >>> >> this weekend. >>> >> (Since we would want to take from current master, a check of the >>> >> licenses will be required to be redone). >>> >> >>> >> Is there interest in RC5? >>> >> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch patches in?) >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Ali >>> >> >>> >> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master a while ago. But I don't >>> remember >>> >> > what were the issues that prevented from us to release rc 0.4. >>> >> > @Ali, so you remember what were the issues? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian Grobmeier < >>> >> grobme...@gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi folks, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> before quite a while, we were discussing a release. It's still >>>not >>> >> there, >>> >> >> and I would like to know what the actual problem is. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> As you know, releases are considered a sign of a healthy project >>>in >>> the >>> >> >> incubator. >>> >> >> It's currently discussed within the IPMC why projects which don't >>> manage >>> >> >> to make a release >>> >> >> after a year should stay in the incubator. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Regards, >>> >> >> Christian >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --- >>> >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> >> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>> >> >> @grobmeier >>> >> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
