Yuri,

AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now.

Thanks,
Ali

On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and later to add
> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be automated. Off
> course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would be great :)
> The wiki contains two todos:
> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id as well?
> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies. (Unknown
> currently whether we need an ECCN or not)
>
> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right?
> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment?
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Yuri,
>>
>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure It
>> needs updating now that we use git rather than svn.
>>
>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that would be great!
>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src releases?)
>>
>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent), then the
>> next step is to manually verify the contents are as expected, and to
>> sign it.
>> I have a very small script to sign all the files using my key, and to
>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files: http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1
>>
>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to vote upon...
>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list to vote upon...
>> Once that is done, release! ;)
>>
>> Ali
>>
>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for update Ali.
>> > I think the release is important to show that we handled all the
>> copyright
>> > issues, so I would prefer just to release as is and then add the patch
>> > later.
>> > Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc 05. Are there any
>> scripts
>> > that should be run? What is the procedure?
>> > By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to create the release artifact
>> -
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/
>> > So, if could to automate the licenses verification and signing we could
>> > release just by running the job in Jenkins...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >> RC4 was merged back in to master around January, and development has
>> >> continued in master from there..
>> >>
>> >> I don't recall any major show stoppers with RC4. A look at the vote
>> >> thread suggests that the only problems left to discuss were the images
>> >> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find no copyright
>> >> assignment. But we fixed this problem in 48c3bc9, by changing the
>> >> thumbnails to some we could attribute.
>> >>
>> >> On a meta level, the problem at the time was that RC4 had a very poor
>> >> vote turnout, disincentivizing further work.
>> >> (And on a personal level, I ran out of time I could put towards Wave)
>> >>
>> >> I don't think there is anything stopping us putting together RC5 over
>> >> this weekend.
>> >> (Since we would want to take from current master, a check of the
>> >> licenses will be required to be redone).
>> >>
>> >> Is there interest in RC5?
>> >> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch patches in?)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Ali
>> >>
>> >> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master a while ago. But I don't
>> remember
>> >> > what were the issues that prevented from us to release rc 0.4.
>> >> > @Ali, so you remember what were the issues?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian Grobmeier <
>> >> grobme...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi folks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> before quite a while, we were discussing a release. It's still not
>> >> there,
>> >> >> and I would like to know what the actual problem is.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As you know, releases are considered a sign of a healthy project in
>> the
>> >> >> incubator.
>> >> >> It's currently discussed within the IPMC why projects which don't
>> manage
>> >> >> to make a release
>> >> >> after a year should stay in the incubator.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Christian
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>> >> >> @grobmeier
>> >> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

Reply via email to