Ok, the suggested release is here - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.5-incubating/ Please review the changes for rc 0.5 at https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/pull/3
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks > Anyway, I created an issue for infra to create release folders for Wave in > the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release > and https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev > https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> The people.apache.org space I was using is just my 'personal' webspace. >> >> You can put things in your public_html folder on that machine. (Ssh in as >> you would expect). >> >> Regards, >> Ali >> On 18 Jul 2014 10:23, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > @Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file >> > into a folder at people.apache.org and make it available for other via >> web >> > interface. Is there some guide how to do this? >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Yuri Zelikov <vega...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Ok >> > > On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> > > >> > > > I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest >> > > > rerunning. >> > > > >> > > > Ali >> > > > On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered? >> > > >> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Ali >> > > >>> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences? >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden < >> > > >>>> michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>>> All, >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the >> > > >> release >> > > >>>>> in any way possible. If you need some one to go through the >> > release >> > > >> and >> > > >>>>> test it. Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready >> let me >> > > >> know. >> > > >>>>> I haven¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> ~Michael >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> On 7/12/14, 6:05 AM, "Ali Lown" <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> Yuri, >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now. >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>> Ali >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and >> > later >> > > >> to >> > > >>>>>>> add >> > > >>>>>>> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be >> > automated. >> > > >> Off >> > > >>>>>>> course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would >> be >> > > great >> > > >>>> :) >> > > >>>>>>> The wiki contains two todos: >> > > >>>>>>> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id as >> > > well? >> > > >>>>>>> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies. >> > (Unknown >> > > >>>>>>> currently whether we need an ECCN or not) >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right? >> > > >>>>>>> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment? >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> >> > wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Yuri, >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here: >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure >> > > >>>> It >> > > >>>>>>>> needs updating now that we use git rather than svn. >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that would be >> > great! >> > > >>>>>>>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src >> releases?) >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent), >> then >> > the >> > > >>>>>>>> next step is to manually verify the contents are as expected, >> > and >> > > to >> > > >>>>>>>> sign it. >> > > >>>>>>>> I have a very small script to sign all the files using my >> key, >> > and >> > > >> to >> > > >>>>>>>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files: >> > > >> http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1 >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to vote upon... >> > > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list to vote >> upon... >> > > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, release! ;) >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Ali >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for update Ali. >> > > >>>>>>>>> I think the release is important to show that we handled all >> > the >> > > >>>>>>>> copyright >> > > >>>>>>>>> issues, so I would prefer just to release as is and then add >> > the >> > > >>>>>>>> patch >> > > >>>>>>>>> later. >> > > >>>>>>>>> Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc 05. Are >> there >> > > any >> > > >>>>>>>> scripts >> > > >>>>>>>>> that should be run? What is the procedure? >> > > >>>>>>>>> By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to create the >> release >> > > >>>>>>>> artifact >> > > >>>>>>>> - >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/ >> > > >>>>>>>>> So, if could to automate the licenses verification and >> signing >> > we >> > > >>>>>>>> could >> > > >>>>>>>>> release just by running the job in Jenkins... >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> RC4 was merged back in to master around January, and >> > development >> > > >>>> has >> > > >>>>>>>>>> continued in master from there.. >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> I don't recall any major show stoppers with RC4. A look at >> the >> > > >>>> vote >> > > >>>>>>>>>> thread suggests that the only problems left to discuss were >> > the >> > > >>>>>>>> images >> > > >>>>>>>>>> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find no copyright >> > > >>>>>>>>>> assignment. But we fixed this problem in 48c3bc9, by >> changing >> > > the >> > > >>>>>>>>>> thumbnails to some we could attribute. >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On a meta level, the problem at the time was that RC4 had a >> > very >> > > >>>>>>>> poor >> > > >>>>>>>>>> vote turnout, disincentivizing further work. >> > > >>>>>>>>>> (And on a personal level, I ran out of time I could put >> > towards >> > > >>>>>>>> Wave) >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> I don't think there is anything stopping us putting >> together >> > RC5 >> > > >>>>>>>> over >> > > >>>>>>>>>> this weekend. >> > > >>>>>>>>>> (Since we would want to take from current master, a check >> of >> > the >> > > >>>>>>>>>> licenses will be required to be redone). >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Is there interest in RC5? >> > > >>>>>>>>>> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch patches in?) >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master a while ago. But I >> > > don't >> > > >>>>>>>> remember >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> what were the issues that prevented from us to release rc >> > 0.4. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> @Ali, so you remember what were the issues? >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian Grobmeier < >> > > >>>>>>>>>> grobme...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> before quite a while, we were discussing a release. It's >> > still >> > > >>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>> there, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and I would like to know what the actual problem is. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As you know, releases are considered a sign of a healthy >> > > >>>> project >> > > >>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> incubator. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's currently discussed within the IPMC why projects >> which >> > > >>>> don't >> > > >>>>>>>> manage >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to make a release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> after a year should stay in the incubator. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Christian >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @grobmeier >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
