Re: [NOTICE] Wave is Retired - What's next?

No idea either... I didn't use google sites before. First discussion in the new group could be whether to move the site to other platform and update the content :S 2018-02-02 10:28 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > Yeah, I added you to the managers of the discussion group, regarding the > waveprotocol.org tha

Re: [VOTE] Retire Wave

+1 2018-01-02 12:31 GMT+01:00 Gaurav Shukla : > +1 > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Henry wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Evan Hughes > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On 2 Jan 2018 7:56 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2017

Thank you Yuri 2017-12-03 14:24 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > I updated the wiki to reflect that we discuss the project termination. > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 3:11 PM wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > > Incubator PMC. It is an initial

Re: Resigning as mentor: what next?

I agree too. This project/community doesn't make enough progresses for being under Apache umbrella. However regarding the future of the project I still work in my own fork that can benefit Wave, so I want to keep Wave somewhere. >From a practical standpoint, I did recap this tasks (what else?) -

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2017

Thanks Yuri for updating the report 2017-09-11 2:56 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > Yuri, > > You have the following two entries: > > > Date of last release: > > March 2016 > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > March 2017 > > Typically we want to know exact dates, as well

Re: Bumping to v0.5

Happy to try this PR ;) 2017-07-01 14:40 GMT+02:00 Evan Hughes : > Well ATM we don't have a specific branch situation, so it's more about > creating a 0.4.# branch to preserve the past and allow us to fix the bugs > in that release. Because I believe we still wanted to do a release soonish. > > O

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

Sorry, I was a bit late... here is the report, please check out and send comments. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2017 Thank you. 2017-06-05 10:11 GMT+02:00 Pablo Ojanguren : > I had scheduled to write a draft this afternoon. Thanks Yuri. > > 2017-06-05 9:45 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

I had scheduled to write a draft this afternoon. Thanks Yuri. 2017-06-05 9:45 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z : > I ll prepare the report, unless there's someone else who volunteers. > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:19 AM wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of

GSoC 2017 - Wave e2e encryption

Hi all, SwellRT/JetPad is participating in the Google Summer of Code 2017 with a project aiming to add end-to-end encryption to Wave OT. The work will be based on the paper [1] and it has been awarded to David Llop. I would like to invite the Wave community to support David during his duty. Of co

Re: Critical Bug in Client Server protocol implementation

> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:50 PM Pablo Ojanguren > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > During user testing in SwellRT/JetPad I ran into a blocker bug. I've > > already open the issue [1]. It can be the same of other critical issues > > (WAVE-312, WAVE-3

Critical Bug in Client Server protocol implementation

Hi all, During user testing in SwellRT/JetPad I ran into a blocker bug. I've already open the issue [1]. It can be the same of other critical issues (WAVE-312, WAVE-358) I have already written a workaround in SwellRT and I will send PR to Wave asap. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE

Re: Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

+1 El El dom, 16 abr 2017 a las 16:44, Yuri Z escribió: > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM Thomas Wrobel wrote: > > > If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then > > that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so this project is > > likely both unfinished

Re: SwellRT update

rk? Or perhaps as a downstream > dependency of SwellRT? How do you see the SwellRT team collaborating > with Wave? > > Upayavira > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, at 03:25 PM, Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > ICLAs from original copyright owners of SwellRT source code has been > > s

Re: SwellRT update

t; questions. > > Has swellrt been donated to the incubator as in the incubator is now where > the official swellrt development will happen? Does this include the > branding asset's? How do we want to handle publishing of the swellrt as a > sub part of this project. > > ~ Eva

SwellRT update

Hi all, My apologies for the late update on SwellRT. I hope this email could help to clarify the ongoing discussion. As summary SwellRT objective is to make Wave generic... Instead of Wave Conversations it provides generic Collaborative Objects. Instead of a GUI it provides an API. *Current sta

Re: To-do's for graduation

t; are > > > missing? > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 2:59 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > > > > > > > Ive hoped on IRC using riot.im so I should be available around the > > > clock. > > > > If you have time it turns out my pull requ

Re: To-do's for graduation

oing to be the initial active participants of the > > > TLP. We have a lot of committers here from 4 years ago that have moved > on > > > to other things and don’t have time to.. My understanding in general > for > > > a TLP is that committers don’t always equal P

Re: To-do's for graduation

That todo list LGTM Thanks Evan 2017-03-10 1:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > Hello all, > > I think it's time for us to make a fixed set of tasks we want done before > we go for graduation. > > To start off the list we must complete all the usual org tasks. This > includes license checking, notice c

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

hing we should continue to discuss. > > Thanks > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, at 03:21 PM, Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just added some content to the report, please add/suggest changes > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017 > > > &

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

ove forward. I can take on > the release management. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:02 PM Pablo Ojanguren > wrote: > > > Ok, let's mention this situation in the report. I agree with Evan, it > will > > be good to set grad for the next report. > > > > &g

Re: Client error after starting stable binaries

I am afraid that issue is fixed in master branch but it hasn't been released as binary version yet. 2017-02-25 4:00 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > Which browser were you in, could you try Firefox instead if you were using > Chrome or the other way around. > > On 25 Feb 2017 6:22 AM, "Ali Nabavi" wrot

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

ms we're also > not > > > going to go away either. Perhaps we should just bite the bullet and > > > discuss graduation? > > > > > > Perhaps this question could be put into the board report somehow? > > > > > > Upayavira > > > &g

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

Sure, I can handle it. Is there something anyone want to be added to the report? 2017-02-27 10:27 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > Hi > Is there anyone who wants to fill the report for March? > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:11 AM wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > > > This email was sent by an automated system o

Re: new committer: Pablo Ojanguren

, Yuri Z wrote: > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Wave has invited Pablo > > Ojanguren to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he > has > > accepted. > > Pablo is an active contributor of high quality code and is active within >

Re: 404 page design

They looks nice! 2017-01-04 9:50 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > Looks great! > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:41 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz1jLGzgQnjtbHdQX0RpOHIyb2tvS > F9Lci1NVVllTnF6dnFJ/view?usp=sharing > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz1jLGzgQnjtNzl6b

Re: Api & Client Rewrite

@evan, of course, using proto format it is perfect. 2016-12-24 15:45 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > @pablo though maybe json should be the standard since through the websocket > trying every possible message would be a waste. I still think the proto > format is a good specifier. > > On 24/12/2016 10:0

Re: Api & Client Rewrite

Hi Evan, That's cool. Two questions... - Is there any advantage providing the API's data as protobuf insteand just JSON? It might be easier just to provide the latest. - It seems good idea to have a separated URL context for the API Also, there are some improvements in SwellRT's servlets regardi

Re: Sorry for delay

Morning Evan, back at home, getting back to speed, well, finally, which chat tool do you rather to talk each other ? 2016-12-12 8:44 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > Sorry for delay in accepting the active pull request fixes, will review > today/tomorrow when I can. > > ~ Evan >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

ated specially with the dev server. Has swellrt > been doing many tests with GWt, we did manage to get ours working, just a > few compilation issues left, just wondering. > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 at 22:10 Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > > Finally I've written down a shorter versio

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

Finally I've written down a shorter version of Adam's text following Upayavira suggestion. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016 Also I pointed out some items I am not sure how to fill, I guess @upayavira you should double check! 2016-12-06 12:49 GMT+01:00 Pablo Ojanguren

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

ome obsolete dependencies. > >2. New branch created on wave repo containing a mirror of swellrt > code. > >3. Updated major dependencies and fixed minor bugs. > > > > > > > > Thanks, and talk soon! > > > > AJ > > > > Adam John >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

dated major dependencies and fixed minor bugs. 2016-12-05 15:39 GMT+01:00 Pablo Ojanguren : > hehe :D you right Evan > > About Mozilla grant I just filled out the form, and just waiting for their > answer. At least, I have been endorsed by Audrey Tang, Digital Minister of > Ta

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

ide note, how did the Mozilla funding for SwellRT go pablo? > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 at 22:57 Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > Ops... well, if you don't mind to invite us... ;) > > 2016-12-05 13:55 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > > > Haha, sorry we were discussing some of the conten

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

Ops... well, if you don't mind to invite us... ;) 2016-12-05 13:55 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > Haha, sorry we were discussing some of the contents in the private channel > but it should've been here, my mistake. > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 at 22:28 Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > &g

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

Hey Adam, I am about to start filling the report... 2016-12-05 13:22 GMT+01:00 Adam John : > I realize this was sent to the list... curious who is completing the > report? > > Also, the "move" referenced... not sure what that might be? > > Report is due Wednesday. > > Thanks, all. > > Adam John >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

I will happy to do it but I cant before next Sunday 2016-11-30 12:46 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > Anyone wants to take on filling the report for December? > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:42 PM wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > > Incubat

Re: SwellRT Applying to Mozilla Open Source Support

r efforts - more > > power to you all! > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, at 06:01 PM, Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > > of course @upayavira I know Apache positioning. I didn't mean to > involve > > > Apache directly, just to offer some help to Wave's community. >

Re: SwellRT Applying to Mozilla Open Source Support

ther person paid to work on an Apache codebase - Apache > cannot give any special affirmation of your effort above those of any > other contributor. > > Does that make sense? > > Upayavira > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, at 11:50 AM, Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > Hi all, > > &g

SwellRT Applying to Mozilla Open Source Support

Hi all, SwellRT community is going to apply for the Mozilla Open Source Support grant (deadline tomorrow November 30th) The initial grant supporting SwellRT development has finished, so we require to find out new funding oportunities like this to keep a stable development effort to move SwellRT t

Re: Stuff and mocking things

Hi Evan, I was reading again your email I am afraid I don't understand your last paragraph properly. ;) how is the plan you refer? Thanks! 2016-11-24 12:19 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > Hey all, > > Been working on removing old dependencies and updating dependencies as can > be seen here > https://g

Re: Stuff and mocking things

Good job Evan. Regarding with gwt module inheritance... I found some problems with new gwt version and path expresions in gwt modules. Does it ring you a bell? 2016-11-28 16:56 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > Great! I was sick for a few days, hopefully I ll get back to fixing the > tests soon. > > On Mon, N

Re: Swellrt dependencies and wave dependencies

> > > > Thqnkyou for this, tuesday is my last exam for the year so I should > be > > > able > > > > to start removing dependencies then. > > > > > > > > On 11/11/2016 8:11 PM, "Pablo Ojanguren" wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: Swellrt dependencies and wave dependencies

Hi all, Sure Evan, cleaning up dependencies seems a good starting point. Yes, SwellRT is basically the same source code than Wave so this is a win-win situation. I am updating the following spreedsheet to track down dependences in order to decide further actions, any contribution is welcome of co

Re: Wave in a box setup

Hi Darin, That error is because Chrome 54 has removed the deprecated Keyboard.KeyIdentifier event property, this prevents the Wave's editor to process key events. You can patch Wave's code with this SwellRT commit: https://github.com/P2Pvalue/swellrt/commit/330326c1fc13d47699a552eab8be7ef4d8bb10fd

Re: Working master branch

sometimes (if at all) {really old > > libraries :( } > > > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 at 03:38 Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > > > > What is the error? it is gradle's script? > > > > > > 2016-10-20 19:22 GMT+02:00 Ben Hegarty : > > > > > >

Re: Retirement

Thanks @Thomas. Sure @Upayavira, go ahead, import the project and try it! If someone needs direct support, please use gitter's chat channel https://gitter.im/P2Pvalue/swellrt Also I keep offer to run a video call for deeper explanation of any aspect. 2016-10-22 15:12 GMT+02:00 Upayavira : > Th

Re: Working master branch

What is the error? it is gradle's script? 2016-10-20 19:22 GMT+02:00 Ben Hegarty : > Hey guys, > > While we wait for the outcome of swellrt is it possible to fix the master > branch so that it compiles and runs? > > Regards > Ben

Re: SwellRT tech overview

Following up Upayavira, I will be very glad to help anyone wanting to start with SwellRT's source code. In this regard I suggest... a) invite you all to *join our Gitter chat *( https://gitter.im/P2Pvalue/swellrt) to reach me out and other SwellRT contributors, and ask directly doubts, just chat

Re: SwellRT tech overview

> Q5) Does anyone have interest in a standing co-work session? Especially > > important would be current contributors. I think this could be a good > > way > > for some on the list that have stalled or reached impasse to begin to > > make > > progress in helping o

Re: SwellRT tech overview

Thanks for your answer Price, I guess we should not delay this discussion... I'd happy to run another call if you think it can move things forward. 2016-10-01 18:40 GMT+02:00 Price Clark : > Pablo, thanks for the presentation. > > While my qualifications to answer this are 0 getting to liste

SwellRT tech overview

Hi all, Regarding today's call about future of Wave, it seems necessary to provide more info about SwellRT to the Wave community. Hence I share with you a short presentation explaning SwellRT, https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/14xBbRakzS1z5CI5B9gbWAlQYMnVLRQkvLjSvZcjWcJE/edit?usp=sharing I

Re: ALL HANDS - 9/28 10am EST

planation. > > >> It simply means there is a meeting - and everyone needs to be there. > > >> (please) > > >> > > >> > > >> *Wednesday September 28 at 10:00am EST* > > >> > > >> I

Re: Java 1.7 or 1.8?

Java 1.8 is required AFAIK, the doc is not updated. Cheers, Pablo 2016-09-08 10:57 GMT+02:00 Ian Dunlop : > Hello, > > I noticed that a recent merge into master was to support java 1.8 > compilation but the docs still say 1.7 required. Is 1.7 still needed to > build? > > Cheers, > > Ian >

Re: jsinterop 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT missing

GWT Snapshots have a wrong transitive dependency to jsinterop. As workaround, you can use the 2.8.0-rc2 version of GWT, in the wave/build.gradle [group: "com.google.gwt", name: "gwt-dev", version: "2.8.0-rc2"], // [?, ?] [group: "com.google.gwt"

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

t is OK, just remove the "new committer" mention - as it > > is not new. > > The last report id here - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2016 > > The last changes can be pulled from the commits after 21-Jun and now. > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:21 PM Pablo

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

I would like to help on this, but I need guidance... Should we say something about the discussion on bringing swellrt into wave? would it help to move towards graduation? Is this http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2015 the last report? Is this draft ok?... WaveA wave is a hosted, live, con

Re: Retirement

* Establish priorities/plan - reference The Wavy Future document > > (link > > > < > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YnhcupFtReZyq5Y5QheIbYFO2epEh > > XGucNZE04r_oA4/edit > > > > > > > ) > > > * Set next steps -

Re: Retirement

ge this agenda as you see fit. > > Requested attendees: >1. Greg Cochard >2. Jonathan Leong >3. Price Clark >4. Thomas Wrobel >5. Evan Hughes >7. Pablo Ojanguren >6. *Everyone on this list!* > > Thanks,

Re: Retirement

t isn't > changing. ;) > > Thanks, and talk soon! > > AJ > > Adam John > (914) 623-8433 > Google+ <http://google.com/+AdamJohn1> | LinkedIn <http://mradamjohn.com/> > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Pablo Ojanguren > wrote: > >>

Re: Retirement

I have been developing a fork of Apache Wave for 2 years (swellrt.org) I can say I have very good knowledge of wave's server and gwt client, I have made changes in almost all the layers of Wave with more or less impact. IMHO to start a wave-like project from scratch is an extremly large and comple

Fwd: SwellRT Free Software Contest!

[image: Imágenes integradas 1] If you like to code, free software and decentralized Internet, Open Source project SwellRT *invites you to participate in its Free Software Contest. * *3000€, 2000€ and 1000€ prizes will be awarded to the best three projects which us

Re: Ubuntu server setup

[ERROR] at WebClient.java(100): > com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethodBody > [ERROR] at WebClient.java(100): > org.waveprotocol.box.webclient.client.WebClient.$clinit()V > com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethod > :wave:compileGwt FAILED > > FAILURE: Build f

Re: Ubuntu server setup

ing us troubles... Probably need to use a stable version. > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:21 PM Pablo Ojanguren > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > that is happening just some days. It seems gwt guys are wrongly > referencing > > the snapshot jsinterop version only in some s

Re: Ubuntu server setup

Hi, that is happening just some days. It seems gwt guys are wrongly referencing the snapshot jsinterop version only in some snapshot builds and it is not available in public reports. I've tried to replace it in gradle without success: configurations.all { resolutionStrategy.eachDependency { D

Re: Github pull requests discussion

+1 2016-04-24 6:25 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kotes : > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:12:52AM +, Evan Hughes wrote: > > I think we should move to github pull requests as the standardised way > for > > all our repos. ATM we have docs and android client on pull requests and > the > > main repo is t

Re: Persistence via git (Was: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension)

Yes, Evan, that's my concern about IPFS. Anycase, they use technolgies addressing our problems 2016-04-21 11:19 GMT+02:00 Evan Hughes : > @andreas: Crypto is never solid ;) > > @yuri: whats your opinion on the IPFS > > @pablo: following the demo it looks li

Re: Persistence via git (Was: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension)

Andreas, I think IPFS follows that approach and it is a good candidate at first glance. 2016-04-21 10:18 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kotes : > Hi Yuri, > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:35:57AM +, Yuri Z wrote: > > I was thinking about Federation via persistence level. In particular whe

Re: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension

; messaging" functionality doesn't really give us anything? > > My preference would be for federation that works out-of-the-box without > external components, rather than aiming for google-scale scalability in the > short term? > > > Dave > > > On 19/04/16

Re: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension

Yuri, it's exciting to think on a blockchain decentralization approach, but AFAIK blockchain is not suitable for such operation rate that a OT system like Wave produce. In that sense is also interesting projects like IPFS In addition, I am still think that the current Wave model

Re: Should we remove Federation?

Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:49 PM Yuri Z wrote: > > > > > (try to log in) > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:44 PM Pablo Ojanguren > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Sure! thanks > > >> > > >> (please could you assign it t

Re: Should we remove Federation?

gt; > *E. Levi Allen* > Social Media Strategist | HeardWork LLC > Social Media Strategist | The Leather Foundation > Contractor, The Talener Group > > In real open source, you have the right to control your own destiny. – > Linus Torvalds > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:33

Re: Should we remove Federation?

In particular you can checkout this h ttps://matrix.org/docs/guides/faq.html#what-is-the-difference-between-matrix-and-xmpp <https://matrix.org/docs/guides/faq.html#what-is-the-difference-between-matrix-and-xmpp> 2016-04-10 13:33 GMT+02:00 Pablo Ojanguren : > Probably an alternative

Re: Should we remove Federation?

uestion - is there someone who wants to fix it, or > > > should we remove the current implementation since it is broken and > maybe > > > think about other ideas besides XMPP. > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM Pablo Ojanguren > > > wrote

Re: Should we remove Federation?

I fully agree, federation is mandatory, and it's what makes wave unique from centralized technologies. I wonder what is the actual issue with federation... is it XMPP? is it the implementation itself? is it the wave protocol design? 2016-04-09 23:02 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z : > I am not sure we know ho

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating released

Congratulations! Great work! Pablo 2016-04-05 19:06 GMT+02:00 Dave Ball : > Fantastic news! Congratulations all! > > Lots of people have spent much time shepherding this release; I for one am > very grateful. > > Thank you. > > Dave > > > On 05/04/16 17:47, Yuri Zelikov wrote: > >> The Apache

Re: Speed issues of wiab resolved and open sourced on github

Great! thanks a lot! really necessary stuff. 2016-03-16 15:15 GMT+01:00 Michael MacFadden : > Cool. Is there a current demo of this running some where? > > ~Michael > > > > > On 3/16/16, 5:01 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote: > > >Hi Kirill > >Great news, thanks! > >I think those were the main issues with Apa

Re: A Wavy Future

ast have been done in GWT > > >> >> libraries; > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RichTextArea.html > > >> >> > > >> >> Its fairly basi

Re: A Wavy Future

Hi, I agree with the dependency hell issue and the suggestion for throwing away the GWT client. This would require a new client-server API as suggested, however I think a Rest API won't be enough, because real editing needs websocket. I also agree with Michael, developing a new editor is a massiv

Review Request 43723: Fixes WAVE-436 In public waves, updates are not sent to implicit participants

ated unit tests. Manual testing. Thanks, Pablo Ojanguren

Re: Android Wave

being > provided in a folder in the repo when I believe they could just be added to > the gradle file and the removal of the intellij project files. > > On 18 December 2015 at 20:46, Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > > > I am only checked out the code, and I didn't understand well wha

Re: Android Wave

I am only checked out the code, and I didn't understand well what was done. It is supposed it was used part of my port of client's gwt code to android [1] [1] https://github.com/P2Pvalue/swellrt-android 2015-12-18 11:38 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > Has any been able to use the Android wave client

Re: Wave build system updated to Gradle

Awesome Evan, thanks a lot. Looking forward to try it! 2015-12-16 17:20 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z : > Yes, I will update jenkins > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 at 18:06, Ali Lown wrote: > > > Thank you Evan for the huge amount of work involved in replacing the > > old Ant system. > > > > @Yuri: Are you on updatin

Re: New website design

Excuse me for being candid. What do you think to choose one free HTML template and to change just colors and logo by CSS? Wouldn't be faster? There are a lot of sites with modern-hipster-cute-cool templates. e.g. this 2015-10-08 17:09 GMT+02:00 Evan Hughes : > I

Re: September 2015 Report

Thank you Yuri 2015-09-03 8:23 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z : > I updated the report for Wave, feel free to review/edit. > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:07 AM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > Greetings, {podling} developers! > > > > This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, September > > 2nd. De

Re: Wave Android App Landing (GSoC)

Hi, good work 1) and 2) Ok 3) I would prefer to provide an .apk file somewhere. 4) A miminim hacking guide to explain the basics. The user guide just explaining how to configure server connection. To consider configure the app with a default Wave that could be used immediatly. Regards, Pablo

Re: Previous attempts at separating the client

Hi Evan, I am responsible of that fork, SwellRT as Thomas has pointed out. It provides two clients: JavaScript: it uses the original client's Java/GWT code to manage the wave protocol stuff. On top of it, a native JavaScript layer is provided. So I have dropped all original IU related code. Andr

Re: Wave App mockups

Cool! My comments and thoughts are for the wave screen: I am not sure if you are only showing the title of the wave or a whole blip text. It would be nice to have enough space to read the blip, for example moving the wave's title to the top bar and the participant list to other screen (like telegr

Android Client

Hello all, I would like to present you a working port of the Wave client to Android including: - It allows you to work at Wave/Wavelet level. - Most of the code is shared with the original Java code. (Wave Model) - Client code with GWT dependencies has been adapted and separated to

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

+1 Moving doc to git would be good, moreover if we update and improve it a litlle bit along the migration process (at least the organization). 2015-04-28 16:40 GMT+02:00 Ali Lown : > Yuri, > > I think the main reason to move is to make it easier for people to > make changes, over the existing con

Re: Coming Months - Summary

Evan, thank you for the summary. I totally agree with points about helping new contributors. In particular with how to provide and improve documentation. I look forward to know the roadmap. I would feel more confortable working in tasks aligned with a clear objective. Personally I'd like to contr

Re: Coming Months

Thanks a lot Evan. I look forward! 2015-04-22 6:09 GMT+02:00 Evan Hughes : > Ill write up a summary for you tonight Pablo, Also youll see some of the > things we talked about come into action in the next few days. > > > > On 21 April 2015 at 19:29, Pablo Ojanguren wrote: >

Re: Coming Months

Unfortunately I couln't make the hangout, but I would be very happy to know any outcome. Thank you very much. 2015-04-20 20:09 GMT+02:00 Ali Lown : > Is anyone else coming to this Hangout? If you still need an invite > just drop your G+ name here and I will add you. > > Ali > > On 20 April 2015

Re: Coming Months

Happy to attend the meeting. 2pm UTC is good to me. 2015-04-07 10:16 GMT+02:00 Upayavira : > Thanks for this, Evan. > > Given it was you that proposed the Hangout, it would seem reasonable > that we try to accommodate you. Anyone here have any objections to an > earlier concall, say, 2pm UTC? Are

Re: Python client API

+1 2015-04-07 23:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Wrobel : > +1 > Incompatible code just confuses things even more. > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > On 7 April 2015 at 22:54, Angus Turner wrote: >

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi, Installed RC7 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. Tested in Firefox and Chrome. Tested memory and MongoDb storage. It works as expected. +1 2015-04-08 11:03 GMT+02:00 Roshan Lakmal : > Hi, > > I installed the RC7 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS and it working fine. > > +1 > > Thanks, > > Roshan > > > > On Tue, Apr

Re: Roadmap

I fully agree with Thomas, You can split the client and sever without switching languages. > This is common in GWT projects. > You just have > - client (gwt java) > - sever (java) > - common (gwt-subset of java, but not using any gwt specific things) > > Common can then be imported by any non-gwt

Re: Roadmap

>From a technical perspective I mostly agree with Yuri's roadmap, priorities apart and wiab.pro improvements are awesome. But I think the big question is what can we do first to get new contributors and foster the community? Do we know what developers want from Wave? For example, personally I am

Re: Raise your hands if you would like to participate

+1 (Actually most of my job is to develop Wave) 2015-03-23 17:47 GMT+01:00 Roshan Lakmal : > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Andrew Kaplanov > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 2015-03-23 19:15 GMT+05:00 Suhail Ahmed : > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, David Banks > > > wr

Re: GSoC 2015 with Apache Wave

itecture and protocol. > > > > Can I still continue this project for GSoC 2015 or Is there any other > > task > > that I can contribute. > > Is there anyone to mentor me for GSoC 2015? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Roshan. > > > > > >

Re: GSoC 2015 with Apache Wave

Hi Roshan, I have re-engineered part of the original GWT webclient and port core code to Android [1]. With the app you can connect to a Wave server and operate at Wavelet-level with the original Java code. A new UI for the conversational model could be added on top of it. As long as original cod

  1   2   >