Evan, thank you for the summary.

I totally agree with points about helping new contributors. In particular
with how to provide and improve documentation.

I look forward to know the roadmap. I would feel more confortable working
in tasks aligned with a clear objective. Personally I'd like to contribute
in the server stuff.

Thomas, thanks for suggesting my work again, but I guess it must follow a
parallel way. Fostering Apache Wave will foster my API anyway.

Pablo





2015-04-23 5:55 GMT+02:00 Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com>:

> Yuri expressed major worries about issues within the current "server"
> components that he felt had due cause to concentrate on them more and just
> increase the completeness of the code base before trying to progressively
> transfer the project in to 2 separate components. It was expressed that we
> have an understanding that having two components would help starters
> contribute so this expression did take this into consideration.
>
>
> Personally I feel if we manage to get todo's done and fix a majority of
> bugs that are currently in the system then we can progressively separate
> the two components. Its not like its gonna be a thing that we decided right
> at this moment well split the two and come back in a few hours and its
> done, it'll be a gradual process and well have to set roadmap's and
> properly organise contributors so we are not stepping on each others toes
> or wasting time. More to come about this latter in the week.
>
> Thomas if you feel like you have the time it seems like not many developers
> currently have experience with GWT if you can think of anyway to clarify
> some of the issues on the jira for GWT components or any suggestions for
> tackling GWT im sure it will be appreciated as this is what im learning atm
> so I can contribute to the "client" components.
>
> On 23 April 2015 at 06:00, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the summery.
> >
> > Quite depressed about the sever/client split being so hard. (especially
> as
> > a GWT developer that loves it and finds it easy to work with....)
> >
> > Is it possible to summarise why the bugs stop the separation? Maybe one
> of
> > the projects that have already forked and made a API could help? (both
> > working Javascript and Android wave projects which
> > were brought up on the list a few weeks back when this was talked out)
> >
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> > On 22 April 2015 at 17:35, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > A Hangout was organised on the 20th of April, featuring some of the
> > > committers/mentors. The following is a summary of topics discussed and
> > some
> > > insight to what will be happening in the coming months.
> > >
> > > Members Present: Evan Hughes, Yuri Zelikov, Christian Grobmeier, Ali
> Lown
> > >
> > > What are the roadblocks to new contributors?
> > >     New contributors do not have a full set of documentation to getting
> > the
> > > apache wave system setup and how they are to contribute (see ali's
> > response
> > > to todo's in previous mailing list). Contributors looking to update
> > > documentation need to be given access to the confluence space, a
> > discussion
> > > about having a git repository was investigated and the task was handed
> to
> > > Evan to investigate and propose the 2 methods to the mailing list in
> the
> > > coming week.
> > >
> > > How to help new contributors?
> > >     It was discussed to increase the amount of jira issues and tag them
> > > correctly for beginners/starters and once a month provide these issues
> to
> > > the mailing list so new users can see what needs to be done that is
> > within
> > > the starting skill level. Who would be handling this was not confirmed
> > > whether it should be a person or an automated bot. This should be
> > discussed
> > > within the committers or discussed a week before start of month about
> > which
> > > issues to include and so on.
> > >
> > > Level of coverage with tests:
> > >     The coverage of the project is currently low around 30 to 40% if i
> > > remember from what ali & yuri were discussing. Writing new tests can
> be a
> > > beginner task but should be written where appropriate to not clog the
> > main
> > > testing suite and maybe be placed in the extensive testing suite. A
> > > coverage percentage should be chosen for the next release (not the 0.4
> > > line) to help stabilise the project but is not high priority.
> > >
> > > The server/client/common split:
> > >     This was shown to be a major issue as expected commits from a third
> > > party were discussed and major large scale bugs need to be solved
> before
> > > this is discussed more. After these issues have been resolved a gradual
> > > long term plan can be set with a discussion with the committers.
> > >
> > > The GWT discussion:
> > >     Some issues in jira were discussed that relate to gwt, it was
> > discussed
> > > whether gwt is what we want/need and it came down to its perfectly and
> > > horrible. Mostly issue with gwt is lack of developers with knowledge if
> > its
> > > workings.
> > >
> > > Issues which could arise:
> > >     It was discussed on how apache will react to a "team" of active
> > > committers that is approx around 3 people as this is the minimum for
> > > releases to be published. An active team of 7 to 8 is what we should be
> > > aiming for as a short term goal for the project. More communication
> > between
> > > active committers should be established so the team becomes stronger.
> > >
> > > General Comments:
> > >     - it was suggested that over the next month we gradually increase
> our
> > > commits.
> > >     - individual committers have there own roadmaps, maybe we should
> > allow
> > > the committers to make this public on confluence or discuss more
> together
> > > about where each aspect of wave is heading (design, high level backend,
> > low
> > > level backend, features)
> > >     - Was mentioned on whether this type of communication (hangouts)
> with
> > > as many active committers/mentors should happen on a regular schedule.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to