I think I have admin access to the old waveprotocol.org site if that helps. I
can probably add people as admins.
~Michael
On 2/2/18, 2:05 AM, "Pablo Ojanguren" wrote:
No idea either... I didn't use google sites before. First discussion in the
new group could be whether to move the sit
+1
On 1/1/18, 2:51 PM, "Upayavira" wrote:
Wave is currently in the Apache Incubator, which has expectations of how a
project matures. Wave, being a small project, over its seven years of
incubation, is not showing signs of reaching graduation. Thus, it seems time we
accept that the Incuba
John,
As a long-time lurker and initial contributor, I agree. The project has just
not ever hit critical mass. There have been several dedicated induvial, there
have been spurts of activity, and there is still much potential. However, the
project just hasn’t been able to move toward graduation
Pablo,
+1 on this approach. I think this is the best idea if we can pull it off.
~Michael
On 3/21/17, 8:30 AM, "Pablo Ojanguren" wrote:
At this moment I don't see Wave as a downstream dependency of SwellRT.
(SwellRT depending on Wave, right?)
SwellRT has modified Wave in different
Hello all,
I know there has been some email traffic on this recently, but I think we
should also prepare a little section in the wiki that talks about the people in
the project. Who would be the committers, the PMC, etc. Essentially who are
going to be the initial active participants of the TL
Upayavira,
+1
We have a lot of folks (myself included) who are very interested in wave, but
aren’t actively developing. We need to show the SwellRT folks that we have
something to offer from a contribution standpoint (e.g. coding, design,
documentation, etc.). If we can bring them some extra
; retirement recently discussed. While not answered conclusively, I
> > think it
> > >> is safe to expect the retirement will be held off *for now*.
> > >>
> > >> This meeting is about the future of Wave.
> > >> If you care about the project *at* *all*, *pl
ould take though. I am so ignorant
> with
> >> >> > > big projects, both socially and structurally. Theres tools out
> there
> >> >> > > supposed to help motivate and organised (www.teamily.com) dont
> know
> >> >> > > how effectiv
ust fizzle out?
>>>>>>> Apache provides somewhat needed pressure, structure and to some
>> extent
>>>>>>> even prestige.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While retirement is understandable necessity for things without
>>&g
Yuri,
Being a mostly silent participant at this point. I would tend to agree with
you. I think however, we should provide a “what next” option. So for example,
people might be more willing to retire the project if they knew for example we
could move to github and still allow people to contri
I don't know that we have to "move" to git hub pull requests. We can support
both I guess?
~Michael
> On Apr 24, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Evan Hughes wrote:
>
> Regarding #1 see the commits I pushed today.
>> On 25/04/2016 12:58 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>>
>> I think we can try it.
>> I see a few cons t
>
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site.
>> > http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story generator.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 21 April 2016 at 07:26, Evan Hughes wrote:
>> >
with a new key. Whenever a participant is added to the wave -
>>>> whoever adds him also adds a new record into this user data wavelet with
>>>> the wave private key that is encrypted with the user's public key. This
>>>> way
>>>> only the new
is own
>wave blockchain (like running his own wallet) or use a web wallet - i.e.
>wave client hosted by someone else.
>
>On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:24 PM Andreas Kotes wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:20:43PM -0700, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>>
I wonder what is the actual issue with federation... is it XMPP? is it the
>implementation itself? is it the wave protocol design?
>
>
>2016-04-09 23:02 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z :
>
>> I am not sure we know how to do it right anyways.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:53
I agree, I don’t think any one was talking about removing federation as a goal.
On 4/9/16, 6:34 AM, "Thomas Wrobel" wrote:
>Oh, if its only the current implementation, sure if its not got value.
>Being merely a onlooker its been a long time since I have looked at
>the codebase - but would re
uill. Its a rich text editor, which emits user events and Jason (the
>>> author) has a module which interprets those events, builds operations
>>> and can do OT with them. It doesn't support rich embedding of
>>> components yet, but he's working on that now.
>>
Cool. Is there a current demo of this running some where?
~Michael
On 3/16/16, 5:01 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>Hi Kirill
>Great news, thanks!
>I think those were the main issues with Apache Wave. Hopefully your
>contributions will allow us to fix those issues and make Apache Wave faster
>and more
? or is this
>> > >> needed anyway regardless?
>> > >>
>> > >> I admit I only know the basics of OT and am vaguely remembering a
>> > >> conversation about realtime blip editing adding complexity to things.
>> > >>
>>
the mailing list it didnt happen at all", but allows for non formal talk
> and back and forth discussion realtime. The Monthly reports that we talked
> about back when we did the hangout session should probably be picked up
> again, ill add it to the monthly todo's.
>
One follow up question though. Does hip hat store conversations in a publicly
accessible manner? If not, we need to make sure key decisions that come out of
chats are captured and discussed on the mailing list for all to see.
~Michael
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Evan Hughes wrote:
>
> I
Sounds great.
~Michael
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Evan Hughes wrote:
>
> I would get infra to make us a hipchat channel so we have some place to
> talk casually web interface / irc, but seesm the jira's down. Looking to
> getting this rolling in some way or another by mid week.
>
> ~ Evan
PM, "Michael MacFadden" wrote:
>Looking over the doc is a good start, I think we could codify some additional
>things or principles that we would want to account for.
>
>Personally, my expertise lies in the OT system and the client to server
>messaging. Both in the imple
Looking over the doc is a good start, I think we could codify some additional
things or principles that we would want to account for.
Personally, my expertise lies in the OT system and the client to server
messaging. Both in the implementation and in the “why/how” of what is there
now.
One th
I agree. I did the initial design of the site we have many years ago, and we
really haven’t done much with it since than. Should we perhaps put an
“advertisement” on the current web site letting folks know we are looking for
help with a new design? If so, I could add that to our current site.
Is there anything we can do to help with that?
On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2
>currently (Justin, Christian).
>
>Ali
>
>On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes wrote:
>> Is the release still stuck due to the iss
gt;> >
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > I checked but didn't find anything. +1 from me.
>> >
>> > I checked on legals of course.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 01:11, Evan Hughes wrote:
+1
On 10/22/15, 2:13 PM, "Alex North" wrote:
>+1
>
>On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 at 22:08 Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
>wrote:
>
>> El 10/10/15 a las 08:58, Ali Lown escribió:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > RC10 is now available for review.
>> > Artefacts can be found here:
>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_
le have the ability to vote - it
>isn't a requirement that it completes within a specific timeframe.
>
>thx.
>
>Upayavira
>
>On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, at 09:39 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I still find the Wave project quite interesting and am
All,
I still find the Wave project quite interesting and am more than happy to help.
I just haven’t really felt the pull of the community. If I thought there we
something specific I could do to help I would be more than happy. I would like
to see the release finally happen. Even if we event
+1
~Michael
> On May 30, 2015, at 3:01 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
>
> Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that
> federation is broken atm?
>
>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira wrote:
>>
>> remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how to
>>
Ali,
Adding them now. First one is in.
On 4/4/15, 12:30 PM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>@Michael: What CSS type issues are these? Could you raise a JIRA issue for it?
>
>Ali
>
>On 4 April 2015 at 19:58, Michael MacFadden
>wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I instal
7;t broken.
>> >
>> > Has anyone checked the file copyright notices?
>> >
>> > Ali
>> >
>> > On 2 April 2015 at 00:31, Michael MacFadden
>> wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
I would be happy to participate. Perhaps the first thing to know is.. What
time zones people are all in. I am in US Pacific Time Zone (UTC -7:00).
~Michael
On 4/2/15, 7:40 AM, "Evan Hughes" wrote:
>sure, just need to know what time of day is suitable for the speakers as we
>should keep a
+1
On 4/1/15, 3:04 PM, "Dave Ball" wrote:
>+1
>
>lgtm - tested simple install, user registration and local waves.
>
>Dave
>
>On 01/04/15 06:11, Yuri Z wrote:
>> RC7 is now available for review.
>>
>> Artifacts can be found here:
>> *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.7-in
I mainly agree with Yuri. I personally believe that the first steps should be
addressing the part that make I hard for new developers to come in and help.
Build System… replacing obscure technologies… developer docs. Separation of UI
from server… etc.
On 3/25/15, 3:08 AM, "Dave Ball" wrote
+1
Although, only if we have some specific objectives, like getting a release, or
mavenizing, or any other well defined task that we can move towards as a group.
More like +0 if it just random work on random issues that I am interested in
knocking of in Jira.
On 3/23/15, 5:47 PM, "Ali Lown"
shan Lakmal
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > > Hi Michael,
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I'm interested to working on Native Android Client [1] because I
>>> think
>>> >> it
>>> >> >
Roshan,
There are plenty of tasks within Wave that could be worked on. Do you have any
particular interest? UI, Backend work, etc.? I am sure we could find you
something.
~Michael
On 3/19/15, 5:33 AM, "Roshan Lakmal" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm Roshan Lakmal, an Undergraduate student from I
All,
Just because Wave would be potentially retired as an apache incubator project,
does not mean that it is any more or less viable as an open source project. It
just means that the project is not right for the apache software foundation.
The code could be, will be, moved to a github reposit
All, I have updated the report on the wiki page for Wave.
~Michael
On 3/1/15, 12:50 PM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>Michael,
>
>If you could write the report this quarter, that would be great!
>(Though there hasn't exactly been a lot to write about...)
>
>Ali
>
Ali,
I’ll type it up today.
~Michael
On 3/1/15, 12:50 PM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>Michael,
>
>If you could write the report this quarter, that would be great!
>(Though there hasn't exactly been a lot to write about...)
>
>Ali
>
>On 1 March 2015 at 18:56
If not one else is able. I am more than happy to help
~Michael
On 2/28/15, 12:42 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>Any volunteers for this report?
>
>On Fri, Feb 27, 2015, at 07:01, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> Greetings, {podling} developers,
>>
>> The "marvin" automated report reminder
Wave Community,
I was wondering if there was any more progress towards a release? I have
a feeling that we were still pretty close. Is there anything I/we could
do to help push this through?
Is there still interest in doing a release?
~Michael
Anything I can do to help with the release?
~Michael
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:49 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
>
> Ok, I updated the wiki, please review/edit.
>
>> On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 4:58:34 PM Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>> Yuri,
>>
>> That sounds like a great plan.
>>
>> I would love to help, but am swampe
Joseph,
I¹d like to drill into the directory structure mapping concept a bit. Can
you epand on the use case where you think ShareJS would be used to map to a
directory structure? I think thing this would help us understand some of
the challenges.
~Michael
From: Richard Davis
Reply-To:
Date
Bruno,
Using lists of lists alleviates of the issues that Joseph mentions with
object properties. With nested list there are safe and easy ways to
handle these types of conflicts since we can increment array indices with
predictable and non-destructive outcomes. You point about lambdas is
correc
uri Z" wrote:
>I think we should discuss the versioning. I adopted the http://semver.org/
>for RC6. So the RC6 version looks like: 0.4.0-rc.6-incubating
>
>And the release version will be 0.4.0.
>
>Any thoughts?
>On Aug 29, 2014 7:37 AM, "Michael MacFadden"
>w
All,
Very nice. I am doing some testing on the demo right now. Thus far
nothing major to report. What are the main things we should be reviewing
for RC6? I have been following the licensing discussion. Anything else?
~Michael
On 8/28/14, 3:10 PM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>Hi
>Please preview/review
+1
On 7/21/14, 12:08 PM, "Andrew Kaplanov" wrote:
>+1.
Ok, I’ll get that updated.
On 7/19/14, 10:02 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>The download page should refer to the official releases location at
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/
>
>
>On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Michael MacFadden <
>mic
Random question. You mention. GR, Wave, and Etherpad. What is GR?
~Michael
> On Jul 9, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Kythyria wrote:
>
>> On 07/09/14 16:25, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
>> Of what benefit would contributing this to wave be?
>>
>> Doesn't wave do a superset of this functionality already? (albeit
All,
Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the release
in any way possible. If you need some one to go through the release and
test it. Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready let me know.
I haven¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute.
~Michael
ot; wrote:
>inline
>
>On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Michael MacFadden <
>michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I’ll need to look at the code a little more, but this appears
>>to
>> handle transforming two operations (or two sets of operations). In
rol Algorithm is at:
>https://github.com/goodow/realtime-operation/blob/master/src/main/java/com
>/goodow/realtime/operation/impl/CollaborativeTransformer.java#L117
>
>
>On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Michael MacFadden <
>michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> He
Most of us are still around! We lurk :-)
On 7/8/14, 9:09 AM, "Andrew Kaplanov" wrote:
>Looks like Apache Wave community still alive!
>I thought everyone had died ...
>
>
>2014-07-08 21:41 GMT+06:00 Michael MacFadden
>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I took
Hello,
I took a look at some of the code. I see where the code implements some
transformation functions (for OT), but I do not see where something like a
Transformation Control Algorithm is implemented.
How do you determine which operations need to be transformed against which
other operations?
No worries. I will just add a banner at the top that says that these
links are pending the upcoming release.
On 1/18/14, 1:14 PM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>I think I did, didn't notice there were some more changes. Sorry.
>
>
>On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Michael
Did some one publish the site? I made these changes and committed them
(for the download links), but I didn¹t publish the changes to the
production site.
On 1/18/14, 1:07 PM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>You can get the sources as described here:
>http://incubator.apache.org/wave/source-code.html
>And then
Done.
On 12/25/13, 11:22 AM, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
>Yuri,
>
>I am pretty sure you are already an Admin. I will add Ali also.
>
>~Michael
>
>On 12/25/13, 11:21 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>
>>Michael, can you please add me and Ali as admins to W
Oh yeah
http://wave.staging.apache.org/wave/downloads.html
~Michael
From: Michael MacFadden
Date: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 at 2:35 PM
To: "wave-dev@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Web Site Updates (Mainly Downloads)
All,
I started updating the web site with a downloads s
All,
I started updating the web site with a downloads section for when we make
our release. I started simple and followed the basic instructions for a
mirrored distribution. The main points were that you are supposed to use
the mirror script for the main artifacts but to use the apache servers o
Yuri,
I am pretty sure you are already an Admin. I will add Ali also.
~Michael
On 12/25/13, 11:21 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>Michael, can you please add me and Ali as admins to Wiki and Jira? Cause
>we
>need backup in case you are not available.
>
>
>
>On Wed, D
Raphael,
I will add you now!
~Michael
On 12/25/13, 1:04 AM, "Raphael Bircher" wrote:
>Hi all
>
>It is possible to get write access to the wave wiki? My nick on the Wiki
>is rbircher. I want to update the build instructions.
>
>Greetings Raphael
Ok that makes sense. I will start working on the downloads section. I
would like to get back in to coding after the release is done. Also
potentially reviving the maven build. But for now, I think working on the
web site will help let you all focus on code and release. So that is what
I will d
elease to do with the build-script, and licensing tweaks
>back in to master. (As they have diverged again a bit). I think this
>is best done after RC5.
>P.P.S. Since you disappeared for a bit, we have migrated fully to Git!
>
>On 22 December 2013 20:53, Michael MacFadden
> wrote
All,
It¹s been a while since I have been able to contribute to the project. I
would like to re-engage.
To that end, I was wondering where we are with the process of making a
release. Could some one summarize where we are at?
Thanks
~Michael
I would still be more than happy to press through the mavenization, but it
seemed like people were some what against the idea until we got the
release out the door historically.
Thoughts?
On 12/1/13, 5:37 PM, "Frank R." wrote:
>It'll get slim once mavenized.
>
>
>On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:06 AM,
What is your wiki username?
On 12/1/13, 5:25 PM, "Thomas Wrobel" wrote:
>Id be happy too...but I dont know how ;)
>Logged in, but I dont think I have editing rights (or I am just missing an
>obvious button).
>--
>For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the "wave" directory
>rather then
Hello,
I actually haven't seen the vote. In fact. Looking at my email I see a
grand total of about 15 emails on my entire gmail account since mid
September.
I don't see the original vote email, nor the email I see forward below.
When was the vote. I would like to go look back and ensure I am
I am in!
On 8/9/13 12:27 PM, "John Blossom" wrote:
>Would love to help!
>
>All the best,
>
>John Blossom
>
>email: jblos...@gmail.com
>phone: 203.293.8511
>google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
>
>> tldr; I need some volunteers to col
All,
Glad to see we got this ball rolling. I wish I could have participated.
I plan to participate in the next round of discussions. Some follow up
thoughts.
1)
On the OT, I think we should put up a wiki page and start listing some
options and pro's and con's.
2)
On the product vs platform.
he best,
>
>John Blossom
>
>email: jblos...@gmail.com
>phone: 203.293.8511
>google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
>
>
>On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Michael MacFadden <
>michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks like there were some more vot
>> community-wide access, that can help.
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >>
>> >> John Blossom
>> >> President
>> >> Shore Communications Inc.
>> >>
>> >> where content, technology and people meet. (S
I am on board with this 100%. We just always need to temper that by
making sure there is still visibility on these lists, as mentioned.
I would be willing to install a wave server at work that should be
persistent (always on).
On 7/25/13 7:00 PM, "John Blossom" wrote:
>Yes, Joseph, the goal is
.8511
> fax: 203.663.8259
> twitter: jblossom <https://twitter.com/jblossom>
> google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
> LinkedIn: John Blossom <http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnblossom>
> facebook: John Blossom
> skype: jblossom
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Michael
gt;>
>>>> Ali
>>>>
>>>> On 17 July 2013 15:33, John Blossom wrote:
>>>> > Great, Michael, find a date that works for you that seems to match
>>>>with
>>>> > others' interests and I will be glad to arrange for this. We can
>
I am definitely interested. I will check my schedule for next week.
~Michael
On 7/16/13 11:02 AM, "John Blossom" wrote:
>That was my thought, also. ApacheWavers, please respond with some avails
>calibrated to UT+1 for this week and next week. Time to get this party
>started! My L,A. project is
My two cents on the protocol site would be that we should create a section
on the apache site and/or wiki dedicated to protocols. The
waveprotocol.org domain could point to that.
On 7/8/13 7:53 AM, "John Blossom" wrote:
>Ali,
>Thanks so much, thoughts below. Best, John
>
>On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at
ian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Angus Turner
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hey Michael,
>>>> Wondering if its possible to give someone else admin to the wiki so
>>>> you don't have to do it all the time...
>>&g
John,
I have given you wiki permissions!
~Michael
We are using confluence currently.
On 6/25/13 8:23 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>What wiki? Do we have one? If not, I can get one set up. We have a
>choice of MoinMoin or Confluence.
>
>Upayavira
>
>On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 04:12 PM, John Blossom wrote:
>> Thank you! Glad to have your help.
>>
>> BTW
John,
If you have a username on confluence, then I can give you permissions.
~Michael
On 6/25/13 8:12 AM, "John Blossom" wrote:
>Thank you! Glad to have your help.
>
>BTW, how does one add oneself to be an editor of the wiki? Anyone? Thanks.
>John Blossom
>
>On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Ch
See comments inline.
On 6/24/13 1:06 PM, "Joseph Gentle" wrote:
>I want to start the discussion around what OT algorithms to use. This
>is going to get technical. This is not a bug. Please ask simple but
>tangential questions (like how does wave's current crypto system
>work?) in a new thread in
I will respond to this section by section in a bit.
However my general comment is that there is a lot to digest here and I think we
need to start putting this stuff in a wiki page(s). I think it will get buried
here. I think we might need individual pages on each protocol idea. And the a
pro/c
jump
>through before making meaningful changes to the code. Eg, if Ali and
>Yuri decided they didn't like GYP, they shouldn't need permission from
>anyone to fix it. And I also don't want non-committers telling them
>not to.
>
>So I guess, I'm happy to form comm
nd if there is interest in supporting this model.
Regards,
Michael MacFadden
http://www.macfadden.org
p with is a
>> protocol that is fundamentally P2P but which interacts with servers as
>> ultra-efficient UI-less peers equipped with some super-powers and
>>services
>> that may not be present in the P2P domain persistently. Call it p2p2P,
>>so
>> to speak. Joh
t;> see about a VM at Apache.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>> > Yes the point would be to get federation up and running. An
>>providing a
>> > place where we can deploy our new OT containers th
MY humble opinion on the P2P issue is as follows. I think if we develop
algorithms that can work in a P2P mode, then we can also support a
client/server architecture as well by just controlling who the peers talk
to. I think the problem with wave was not the client server architecture,
but rather
So that's two reasons to push the switch to maven in before the release.
Do we want to do that? It will solve the Jars issue to.
~Michael
On 6/21/13 4:12 PM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>Switching to Maven would give us mvn eclipse:eclipse which would
>generate these files for us. We could do the same
s?
>
>
>Either way, thanks for the efforts.
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Michael MacFadden <
>michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As soon as we have a release, I am going to put the stable release on
>>two
>> serv
All,
As soon as we have a release, I am going to put the stable release on two
servers. One will be my personal server. Another one will be a server
hosted by my company. I think we we have a couple environments up and
running it will help.
Also, I may be able to set up some sandboxes where we
Wavers,
Please welcome Joseph Gentle as an active Apache Wave Committer. Joseph has
been with the project since the beginning in some for or another and has
been active in wave like projects for the last three years. Joseph has now
become a full and active committer and we are thrilled to have h
Sounds great to me.
On 6/21/13 2:09 PM, "Pratik Paranjape" wrote:
>+1
>
>And I thought you were already a mentor for Wave! I am sure it wasn't only
>me.
>
>Welcome.
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
>
>> Sounds good to me. [+1]
>>
>> Welcome :)
>>
>> -Joseph
>> On 21 Ju
2p file sharing is too casual system to pick up from for our
> use case.
>
>
>>>
>>> *8) Identifying participants (3 parts)*
>>> Pure p2p means many peers don't have a n...@centralized-server.com user
>>> handle, so an alternative has to be used.
&g
True,
I would hate to see us inject ivy if we know we are going to just switch
to maven.
~Michael
On 6/21/13 4:34 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>If I remember correctly, there is a maven transition nearly completed.
>Ivy is a good option, but if maven is already done, why not use that?
>
>O
We should create a section for these topics in the wiki in some sort of design
space.
~Michael
On Jun 21, 2013, at 6:06 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> Bruno,
>
> Thanks, this is an excellent summary. It helps me to get the gist of things
> more clearly.
>
> On the P2P latency, I don't think that
I somewhat agree with Yuri on this. I think for the experiments section
we should not require code reviews. I think the code reviews have been
very helpful for people to collaborate and learn the existing codebase and
has kept it from introducing a lot of instabilities. I would note that
almost
quickly be
>self selecting.
>
>Upayavira
>
>On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 10:11 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Michael MacFadden
>> wrote:
>> >>To start, I want to build a generic P2P OT container. This is a simple
>> >>wr
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
