Yeah. Chatting is fine and beneficial. We just need to make sure we capture key 
decisions and rationale back in the list for all to see. 

~Michael

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> It does not so as Ive seen other projects state this motto "If its not on
> the mailing list it didnt happen at all", but allows for non formal talk
> and back and forth discussion realtime. The Monthly reports that we talked
> about back when we did the hangout session should probably be picked up
> again, ill add it to the monthly todo's.
> 
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 at 11:58 Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> One follow up question though. Does hip hat store conversations in a
>> publicly accessible manner?  If not, we need to make sure key decisions
>> that come out of chats are captured and discussed on the mailing list for
>> all to see.
>> 
>> ~Michael
>> 
>>> On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would get infra to make us a hipchat channel so we have some place to
>>> talk casually web interface / irc, but seesm the jira's down. Looking to
>>> getting this rolling in some way or another by mid week.
>>> 
>>> ~ Evan
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 at 19:48 Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The client-server protocol would define a protobuf and json rest
>> services
>>>> so any language that support protocol buffers would be able to make a
>>>> client or fallback to the json rest.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 at 19:24 Andreas Kotes <
>> count-apache....@flatline.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> FWIW,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I also consider the idea pretty good and would want stronger decoupling
>>>>> of server/client. I'd be interested in a python client implementation,
>>>>> mostly for CLI and bot integration.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not sure whether doing a client-side C implementation of the
>>>>> communication protocol would be best here (so wrapper for more
>> languages
>>>>> can follow), or whether native Python would be better. We need
>> something
>>>>> for non-Java folks in any case, I think.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> 
>>>>>  count
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:52:34AM +1000, Evan Hughes wrote:
>>>>>> Thankyou all for your feedback and expressions of interests, seems
>> like
>>>>> we
>>>>>> may be able to develop some teams together to make this a faster
>> reality
>>>>>> than just I. Hopefully we can get some more people to express
>> interests
>>>>> in
>>>>>> this way forward.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andreas 'count' Kotes
>>>>> Taming computers for humans since 1990.
>>>>> "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go
>> do
>>>>> it.
>>>>> Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -- Howard
>>>>> Thurman
>> 

Reply via email to