On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:37:28AM -0700, Michael Ossmann wrote:
>
> I've also noticed something else that concerns me with TridiaVNC (not
> TVP). It doesn't contain the copyright notices of the various
> authors, notably AT&T, Widget Workshop, Inc., and Jef Poskanzer, in
> the binary distributi
Brian,
Thanks for posting. It's nice that you guys are willing to discuss this
stuff publicly. :-)
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:03:36AM -0500, W. Brian Blevins wrote:
>
> I am most definitely not a lawyer.
Understood. Neither am I.
> > Personally, I suspect there is a GPL violation going on
If they can add some refinements to handle issues on the windows side then they have
a possible winner. I believe the big (best known?) competitor in the remote-admin
market is Symantec and their single platform pcAnywhere at roughly $150 per seat.
My big issue is Security. The WinVNC server cur
> >From what I can tell it certainly looks as though the Pro version is not
>free to install and use after the 30-day evaluation period.
>
>Refer to the following quote from the TridiaVNC Pro Price List at
>http://www.tridiavncpro.com/product/pricing.html
>
>"TridiaVNC Pro Media Kit Includes print
>From what I can tell it certainly looks as though the Pro version is not
free to install and use after the 30-day evaluation period.
Refer to the following quote from the TridiaVNC Pro Price List at
http://www.tridiavncpro.com/product/pricing.html
"TridiaVNC Pro Media Kit Includes printed User
--- "Gustafsson, Bjorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nothing there states that they will not be giving
> out the core VNC client for free.
That's not really the issue -- I'm sure they will do
that.
> They could charge money for their UI and the extra
> functions provided by the programs around,
Nothing there states that they will not be giving out the core VNC client
for free.
They could charge money for their UI and the extra functions provided by the
programs around, but as long as they distribute VNC for free, they're safe.
/Bjorn
-Original Message-
From: Neil Winton [mai
FWIW, I've not gotten anything I'd consider "spam" from Tridia. IMHO, if
you download a _free_ product from them, I think you should expect to get
at least one (1) e-mail...
At 04:14 PM 7/16/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Tridia Corporation does not send unsolicited emails, otherwise known as
>spam.
Todd,
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 23:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: TridiaVNC not saving connection info
>
> When I save a connection with TridiaVNC, and then try to launch it again,
> I get the following error:
>
> Invalid VNC server specified.
>
Hi
windows 2000
bye
Goermet
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: TridiaVNC and Webaccess
> >Know anyone why I cannot acces via the java viewer. The Po
I wish they would include it. Its getting annoying that its not in the
release version.
Ken Foster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan Morton
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TridiaVNC and
>Know anyone why I cannot acces via the java viewer. The Port 5800 is'nt open
>on the host and I can't found anything to open it.
>With the normal viewer it works fine.
Which platform are you using? I understand Tridia disable Java by default
on some platforms, apparrently until they have "a bet
Hello
it is a direkt contact in a LAN without a firewall
bye
Goeran
- Original Message -
From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: re: TridiaVNC and Webaccess
Goeran:
Hello! My guess would be that there's a firewall
of some sort protecting the VNC server, and it has been
configured to allow 5900 through, but not 5800. Is there
any way you can check the firewall setup?
Good luck!
-Scott
> Know anyone why I cannot acces via the java view
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> As I've mentioned before, much of TridiaVNC's bulk is accounted for by
> their special installer and associated Java VM. I'm fairly sure a
> binary-packaged installer would be much smaller and simpler.
Yes, but since that's not presently an option, I
>I don't know if there's a hard and fast rule. The major tradeoffs are size
>and speed. The TridiaVNC distro is about 7-11 MB, whereas the binaries
>from AT&T are about 1 MB. So, obviously the AT&T binaries are faster to
>download and install on a slow link, but will not offer the same native
>com
I don't know if there's a hard and fast rule. The major tradeoffs are size
and speed. The TridiaVNC distro is about 7-11 MB, whereas the binaries
from AT&T are about 1 MB. So, obviously the AT&T binaries are faster to
download and install on a slow link, but will not offer the same native
compress
You can implement that separately.
-Original Message-
From: Lyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 11:56 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: TridiaVNC & Netscape
I am looking at the compression that they talk about. Or is that just a
pipe
Lyle,
> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 11:55:53 -0600
> From: Lyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: TridiaVNC & Netscape
>
> I am looking at the compression that they talk about. Or is that just a
> pipe dream on their part?
>
No dreaming to it. Both the zlib and
I am looking at the compression that they talk about. Or is that just a
pipe dream on their part?
-Original Message-
From: Dewar Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 10:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: TridiaVNC & Netscape
Tridi
TridiaVNC is not an upgrade. Stick with the original unless you need and
want paid support.
-Original Message-
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 01:51:41PM -0600, Lyle wrote:
> I upgraded one of the linux
> boxes to the TridiaVNC v 1.2.1 and it works fine except I can't connect
via
> Netscape no
nothing wrong it is just that tridia has removed the java browser
support, i found it in their sourcecode when i asked they said it
will be replaced by other technologies, until then
i guess we can switch back to the att version now.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 01:51:41PM -0600, Lyle wrote:
> I
Gene,
> RE: TridiaVNC
>
> From: Gene Giannamore ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Date: Fri Dec 15 2000 - 17:51:16 GMT
>
>
>
> is it ok for me to download the newest (1.3.3 i think it said) and compile
> and use it?
> Unfortunately my company will not purchase anything
rmann, David (DA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 5:14 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: TridiaVNC
According to the release notes, Jeremy's code is included in the 1.3.1
source code. The current binaries, to the best of my knowledge, do not
include
, font smoothing,
and all that fancy junk).
-Original Message-
From: j.peaks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TridiaVNC
Yes, at the moment the code is in the prerelease. I don't know when this
will appear as the
seful version.
I have actually tried the prerelease, and find it works very well. Some
very useful additions in there!
Jeremy Peaks
- Original Message -
From: Habermann, David (DA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 15 December 2000 13:13
Subject: RE: TridiaVNC
&
According to the release notes, Jeremy's code is included in the 1.3.1
source code. The current binaries, to the best of my knowledge, do not
include it.
Dave Habermann
-Original Message-
From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 3:46 PM
To: vnc-
I noticed the same issue when compiling the latest source codes (1.3.1 Win).
The source segment "vncHTTPconnect.cpp" was not even present in the project
(although the source file was still part of the distribution). I was able
to hack the HTTP server back in but I didn't work to get the Java down
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:59:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken TridiaVNC has made some modifications to the original
> VNC source code.
They have added copyright lines, yes.
Tim.
*/
[demime 0.97b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
---
If you want
to think about similar concepts, Red Hat's distribution of Linux seems to be
the most similar.
-Original Message-
From: David Krassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tridiavnc
** Reply Requested When
/USR/TesmaGroup)
Subject: Re: tridiavnc
11/29/2000
7; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weatherall" cc: (bcc: Tom Hipsz/USR/TesmaGroup)
<[EMAIL PROTEC
** Reply Requested When Convenient **
Hello:
Please what exactly is the difference between Tridiavnc and vnc. I thought
they were both open source. The onlydifference I can see is the fact that
Tridiavnc can be purchased on cd and alsohas support. Is this the case.
---
> > Hello all,
> > I just installed TridiaVnc on my w2k server.
> > It seems to be much less stable then the ORL's VNC.
> > In case of ORL's it
> > never crashed, with Tridia so far today twice in one hour.
Have you tried a complete uninstall of TridaiVNC and re-install? I had a
report that VNC
Tom,
> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:10:12 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: tridiavnc
>
> Hello all,
> I just installed TridiaVnc on my w2k server.
> It seems to be much less stable then the ORL's VNC.
> In case of ORL's it
> never crashed, with Tridia so far today twice in one hour.
If t
35 matches
Mail list logo
