On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 05:32:02PM -0500, Alex K. Angelopoulos wrote:
> The problem is that there are multiple passwords defined in your VNC setup -
> one for the machine, one for the logged on user.
>
> When you change the password while logged in (when else would you do it, of
> course) it modi
: Mike Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Let's say I'm running the server on Solaris and I usually connect from
: a viewer running under Windows. I sometimes I connect via ethernet
: from the same subnet and it's super fast (10 Mbps), sometimes from DSL
: at home (384 kbps, say) and sometimes from a 2
chip, i dont know the answer to your problem, but i was wondering if you can help me
out with a problem i was having can u please explain to me how to use vnc because
i am a client on a network, i am using ics and would love to be able to use vnc on my
client where do i configure dns2
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Michael Milette wrote (quoting the tightVNC web site):
> Efficient compression algorithms. New Tight encoding is optimized for
> slow and medium-speed connections and thus generates much less traffic
> as compared to traditional VNC encodings. At the same time, TightVNC
> supp
On Friday 05 April 2002 03:53 pm, Chip Wood wrote:
> I have a crazy problem.
>
> I can remotely access a computer that I have VNC installed on from outside
> the office using DNS2GO and I can access the computer internally using
> VNConnect (great if you don't already have), however I can not acce
On Friday 05 April 2002 03:02 pm, Alex K. Angelopoulos wrote:
> Peter, do you mind me quoting your paragraph about bandwidth/latency?
> That's the best succinct description I've ever read.
Go nuts. I thought it was kind of confused when I wrote it. In fact I
almost cut it before I sent the mes
From the TightVNC web site ( http://www.tightvnc.com/ ):
=
TightVNC Features
Local cursor handling. Cursor movements do not generate screen updates any
more, remote cursor movements are processed locally by the viewer, so you
do not see remote cursor pointer moving too slow b
Joe,
Newer version and the best reason I have found is that Tight has FAST
download as a default vice RELIABLE which makes a quicker connection.
Chip
- Original Message -
From: "Joe O'Bremski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:57 PM
Subject: Tig
I keep hering about TightVNC but what are the advantages vs disadvantages to
the regular VNC found on the AT&T site?
-
Joe O'Bremski, IT Manager
Carina Corporation
702-228-6376 x248
-
To unsubs
I have a crazy problem.
I can remotely access a computer that I have VNC installed on from outside
the office using DNS2GO and I can access the computer internally using
VNConnect (great if you don't already have), however I can not access the
computer within my office using the url for DNS2GO or
You may be confusing -depth and -bgr233:
-depth tells the viewer to create its local window at that depth. The
pixel size used to talk to the VNC server is not affected (and
will probably be 32 bits). If the local system doesn't support
that depth, the option is ignored (as you noticed)
Oops - didn't see the earlier responses... :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew van der Stock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2002-04-05 03:59
Subject: RE: Password change
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE HKLM
>
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER HKCU
>
> Careful in there - the above
The problem is that there are multiple passwords defined in your VNC setup -
one for the machine, one for the logged on user.
When you change the password while logged in (when else would you do it, of
course) it modifies the password in HKCU, not HKLM.
First, for reference, here is the WinVNC s
Peter, do you mind me quoting your paragraph about bandwidth/latency? That's
the best succinct description I've ever read.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hutnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2002-04-05 12:00
Subject: Re: tight vncviewer
> On Friday 05
CBee
Sorry took so long to reply.
I have found the browser (on NT anyway) is much faster than the
viewer/server connection. AS we are running a slow speed connection, any
improvement in speed is significant. I have found that in general Linux is
faster then W32 as well so am hoping this will wor
Hello i'm using vncviewer on redhat linux.
vnc version:
3.3.3r2-27
i issue a:
> vncviewer -depth 8 10.1.1.2
The depth never takes effect, it always says 32 instead of the specifed
value of 8.
Anyone know why?
--
Regards,
-Chris
_
On Friday 05 April 2002 09:09 am, Morrison Davis wrote:
> My whole purpose of trying tight VNC was to speed up screen repaints of a
> 2d cad package
> running over ATT broadband but so far I have yet to achieve any preformance
> gains in fact
> it may even seem slower. What am I doing wrong, Oh I'
My whole purpose of trying tight VNC was to speed up screen repaints of a 2d
cad package
running over ATT broadband but so far I have yet to achieve any preformance
gains in fact
it may even seem slower. What am I doing wrong, Oh I'm using solaris on both
ends of the pipe, going through VPN.
Rich
I copied the java components over. I can access them via webserver when
httpport is something different than the normal port. Otherwise it
won't work. And unfortunately it seems to be a single session/wm setup
MaShaun
On
Fri, 5 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] "Beerse, Corni" wrote:
> The HP-UX distributio
Hoi!
I've a major problem with the arrow keys on a remote machine over
WinVNC. When I press an arrow key in a console application, the screen
displays the corresponding number, as seen I press the numeric keypad with
numlock off.
It's a bug, or feature.
S
naa, now you are mixing some things
THe sourcecodecorner link is for advanced users and unix systemadmins that
know something about what they are doing. It needs to have the basic vnc
setup running or at least able to run.
See below for some details on your message.
> -Original Message-
We are trying to connect over the internet and I receive this error message:
java.io.IOException:Framebuffer update rectangle too large: 32x1024
at(112,235).
At first, I thought that it might have something to do with the screen size
on both
machines, needing to be set to the same size, but i
I have tried to set up gnome as the xserver for vnc as directed in the url
below, but all I get is "failed to connect to server"
If I try "xserver :0" I get the following message. "A VNC server is already
running as :0"
I can telnet to the port, and I have checked the XDMPC.
Everything seems to
> -Original Message-
>
> Thanks. I'll look at the URL you sent when the time permits later this
> weekend.
>
> In brief, I have the system working through the browser (IE5.5) at the
> moment the connection is like this:
>
> Linux Firewall> -- NT4
> (VNCServer)>
>
> The only chang
CBee
Thanks. I'll look at the URL you sent when the time permits later this
weekend.
In brief, I have the system working through the browser (IE5.5) at the
moment the connection is like this:
Linux Firewall> -- NT4
(VNCServer)>
The only change will be:
Linux Firewall> ---
NT4 (VNC
> -Original Message-
> Sorry I should have told you the OS as well.
> I am using Slackware 8 (Sorry I'm a bit of a novice still), I want to
> convert all W32 (NT) to Linux eventually. VNC servers are all
> on NT and I
> use the browser exclusively to contact these servers. Thanks
> for a
Sorry I should have told you the OS as well.
I am using Slackware 8 (Sorry I'm a bit of a novice still), I want to
convert all W32 (NT) to Linux eventually. VNC servers are all on NT and I
use the browser exclusively to contact these servers. Thanks for all the
advice so far I'll be trying to get
> -Original Message-
> May be my question yesterday was confusing to many.
> Here I am putting in a different way.
You re-quiestion tells me that you make some thinking error. My comment is
about winvnc. at this time, forget all about Xvnc.
>
> 1. I connect to a VNC Server from my offic
> -Original Message-
> They work the same way. The applet is served from a mini web
> server running
> on, say, port 5800; the applet then immediately connects you
> to port 5900.
> Only the initial applet download comes through the lower
> numbered port.
As mailed (some minutes ago)
The HP-UX distribution is minimal, just the binaries and the vncserver
script. If you read the script (vncserver), you can see you need some java
files which are not in the distribution.
Get any other distribution (SunOS or Solaris) and copy the java files from
there to your HP-UX box. Then point
> -Original Message-
> Do you know how to do the same using KDE Konquerer. I get a
> java error :
> "Java applet not loaded".
If you have the HP-UX server too, check if the applet is sent...
CBee
>
> Rgds
> Eric
>
> Serik Associates
> Suite 246, P/Bag X6
> Cascades, 3202
>
> www.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew van der Stock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: Password change
> This is the default (HKLM) vs user (HKCU) behavior. You need to go in
> with the registry editor and make the HKLM password
HKLM is the HKEY Local Machine structure in the Registry, and HKCU is the
HKEY Current User structure. Both structures have VNC in the tree, with
relevant registry keys for each bit.
-Original Message-
From: Jean LECLERCQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 April 2002 09:35
To: [EMAIL PR
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE HKLM
HKEY_CURRENT_USER HKCU
Careful in there - the above is really regedt32 101. Copy the data from
\software\orl\winvnc3\default\password
from HKCU to HKLM, and you're done.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew van der Stock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: Password change
> This is the default (HKLM) vs user (HKCU) behavior. You need to go in
> with the registry editor and make the HKLM password k
35 matches
Mail list logo
