Unable to locate resource library?

2006-08-29 Thread Jasper Huzen
I'm trying to build a test project with Tapestry. I'm just trying to use the Contrib library, but I get the problem with including (location) the library file. The browser gives the next message: Unable to locate resource 'org/apache/tapestry/contrib/Contrib.library' relative to context:/

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Geoff Longman
Francis Amanfo - I admire your passion. Please don't hijack my name or situation to push your agenda. I feel as strongly as anyone else who is pro tooling but to use me as a basis for attack on Howard alienates many and does nothing to further your wishes. I feel it belittles my many years of hard

Test (duck!)

2006-08-29 Thread Geoff Longman
I unsubscribed (and have the final GOODBYE message to prove it) but I'm still getting mail.. More to follow about IDE support Geoff

Re: Anyone ever use StringEscapeUtils.unescapeHtml

2006-08-29 Thread andyhot
You don't have to use the StringEscapeUtils class. Just read the docs of the Insert component http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/Insert.html and use the raw parameter Teofilus Maximillian wrote: > Hi guys, I tried to use StringEscapeUtils.unescapeHtml, from hardcod

RE: Anyone ever use StringEscapeUtils.unescapeHtml

2006-08-29 Thread James Carman
Have you tried setting the raw property to true? -Original Message- From: Teofilus Maximillian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:56 PM To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Anyone ever use StringEscapeUtils.unescapeHtml Hi guys, I tried to use StringEsca

Anyone ever use StringEscapeUtils.unescapeHtml

2006-08-29 Thread Teofilus Maximillian
Hi guys, I tried to use StringEscapeUtils.unescapeHtml, from hardcoded in the java class, until I put in the .page file. I show my example... probably you can help me to figure out import org.apache.commons.lang.StringEscapeUtils; public String getThreadBody(){ dCon="test";

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread andyhot
spindle-core (for Tap4) does this way in an IDE independent way. I was taking a look at it 4 months ago, and I was able to do exactly this. For instance: public static void main(String[] args) { TapestryCore core = new TapestryCore(new TestLogger(), new LocalCoreListeners()

RE: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Mark Stang
Konstantin, Not meant for you, meant for Francis Amanfo, his reply to you was: Konstantin, I don't agree completely with you on his one. I must say that I do my Tapestry development in Eclipse without Tapestry IDE and I'm happy. However I know a lot of junior to middle level developers who think

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
Agreed, but that could be done as build time 'check' step. Something like JSP compiler task http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/jspc.html I think it could be easier to create than full IDE plugin and such core service might be a very good foundation for people willing to build IDE specif

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread D&J Gredler
I mostly agree with you that current tooling gets us pretty far, but there's a lot to be said for turning the most frequent "runtime" errors into "compile-time" errors, something that often requires special Tapestry awareness. On 8/29/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My point

Re: Progress Bar

2006-08-29 Thread Peter Dawn
perhaps i shouldnt have raised this in the first place. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
Huh? What are you talking about? --- Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, if you are that good, switch to a plain vanilla > version of vi and let's see how "good" you are... > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Mark Stang
Hey, if you are that good, switch to a plain vanilla version of vi and let's see how "good" you are... -Original Message- From: Konstantin Ignatyev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 8/29/2006 3:01 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on" The keyword h

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
The keyword here 'think'. That is very common, but what we actually seek is not ZZZ-IDE or plugin, but features like: - code navigation; - code completion; - syntax checks and coloring; That is about it. Tool like IntelliJ pretty much takes care of all those things without any Tapestry specific

Re: catch custom exception generated in tapestry app in filter?

2006-08-29 Thread andyhot
in pageBeginRender of your custom exception page, check if the execption is of type UnAuthenticatedException and if it is, throw it again! Phillip Rhodes wrote: > Yes, I am using that feature for "Unchecked" exceptions. I just have some > a checked exception (UnAuthenticatedException) that I woul

Re: catch custom exception generated in tapestry app in filter?

2006-08-29 Thread Phillip Rhodes
Yes, I am using that feature for "Unchecked" exceptions. I just have some a checked exception (UnAuthenticatedException) that I would like to catch in my filter and this filter will send a redirect to the sso server. I don't want to do this globally for all exceptions. Just my one exception "UnA

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Francis Amanfo
Konstantin, I don't agree completely with you on his one. I must say that I do my Tapestry development in Eclipse without Tapestry IDE and I'm happy. However I know a lot of junior to middle level developers who think they would be more productive with a Tap IDE. So it's not only a matter of opi

Re: catch custom exception generated in tapestry app in filter?

2006-08-29 Thread andyhot
Why not create your own exception page? You can define a method public void setException(Throwable value) { ... } and Tapestry will call this before activating your exception page. Phillip Rhodes wrote: > I have a checked exception that is thrown from various listeners in my > tapestry app. I

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
It is all matter of opinion but I would say that IDE like IntelliJ + DreamWeaver out of box provide enought features to be productive with Tapestry. Certain Tapestry specific features would be nice to have but they are not critical IMO. --- Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, >

catch custom exception generated in tapestry app in filter?

2006-08-29 Thread Phillip Rhodes
I have a checked exception that is thrown from various listeners in my tapestry app. I was hoping that I could use a servlet filter to catch these specific exceptions in order to deal with them. Is this just something that is impossible to do within the tapestry framework due to tapestry having

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Francis Amanfo
Guys, Allow me to quote from Howard's blog at http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=115379415681750974 The quote goes: "As a reminder: Rails, the biggest success story I can name, has no tooling at all. Tooling is no replacement for productivity." First of all, I question his us

Re: Formatting the Contrib:TableView component

2006-08-29 Thread andyhot
There's a pagesClass parameter for contrib:Table for exactly that class. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have a pretty simple Contrib:Table that nicely and automatically > displays the "<< < 1 2 3 > >>" paginator/linker thingy. > > *Without* "blowing up" my Contrib:Table into a TableView, is

Formatting the Contrib:TableView component

2006-08-29 Thread Thomas.Vaughan
Hi, I have a pretty simple Contrib:Table that nicely and automatically displays the "<< < 1 2 3 > >>" paginator/linker thingy. *Without* "blowing up" my Contrib:Table into a TableView, is there any way to stylize the paginator section? I know you can set the "pageSize" binding on the Table compo

Re: Progress Bar -- A comment, a request, and an offer

2006-08-29 Thread Patrick Moore
Hi Jesse -- First thanks for all your hard work on bringing dojo to Tapestry 4.1 I look forward to using it in the next couple of weeks. (A comment) I understand Mark's perspective. Companies and teams that made a commitment to Tapestry had to sell Tapestry to their managers over Struts/JSP/etc.

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Those are great points. .. I should say that while I don't have enough time to work on a plugin project, I will certainly provide "special" support in the form of bug fixes/answers to question to anyone building any tapestry related projects that I think the community/developers could benefit fro

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Patrick Moore
--- Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those simple features you mention are not so difficult to implement and i > could easily provide those in TapIDEA without Spindle. Still, when i think > of Tapestry ÎDE support i think of something much more complete and feature > rich like what Spindl

Re: should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl?

2006-08-29 Thread Patrick Moore
That's what I was wondering about ... Sounds like I don't want to use ognl too much within my new code if I want to reduce my future porting headaches. -Pat --- Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/29/06, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi there -- > > > > I saw this p

RE: Progress Bar

2006-08-29 Thread Mark Stang
Jesse, Don't misunderstand me, I wasn't asking anyone to support T3 anymore than they already are, which is mainly bug fixing and answering questions. I believe that Spindle for T3 and T4 is pretty much dead. T5 will be a whole new beast and maybe there will be some tool support then. As far

Re: Progress Bar

2006-08-29 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
These points are certainly valid sounding. I don't want people to think I don't care about what the community wants. My hands are unfortunately tied. I barely have enough time to work on Tapestry as it is, let alone another project like plugins..Trying to find time to work on a project I would ne

RE: Progress Bar

2006-08-29 Thread Mark Stang
Th original problem was that 3.x needed to evolve. So, 4.x was the next generation. However, as Howard was creating 4.x he realized that he wanted to skip ahead to the next generation of Tapestry. Tapestry users were not ready, so Howard left "4.xers" behind. And Jesse took over the evolutio

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Hugo Palma
Those simple features you mention are not so difficult to implement and i could easily provide those in TapIDEA without Spindle. Still, when i think of Tapestry ÎDE support i think of something much more complete and feature rich like what Spindle for T3 provides. It was and is TapIDEA's goal to p

Re: Progress Bar

2006-08-29 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
It is an open source project, anyone can make Tap3 / 4 / 5 anything they want it to be. I work on 4.X because that's what I currently enjoy. On 8/29/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some of us have a large projects. Or could it be that Tapestry > 3. is so unstable as to b

Re: should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl?

2006-08-29 Thread Henri Dupre
On 8/29/06, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there -- I saw this post ( http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=41923) over on theserverside. It was announcing Stripes 1.4. The original post and comments are all refering to what a dog ognl is from a performance perspec

Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on"

2006-08-29 Thread Henri Dupre
On 8/28/06, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since Geoff decided to leave the Spindle project i've been thinking about the future of TapIDEA. As many of you know, TapIDEA is built on top of Spindle, which means "No Spindle" -> "No TapIDEA". There are several scenarios that can be put into

RE: Progress Bar

2006-08-29 Thread Mark Stang
Some of us have a large projects. Or could it be that Tapestry > 3. is so unstable as to be not worth the effort. First, there isn't a Spindle product, then there is and now there isn't. Then 4.x is the Holy Grail of web frameworks until Howard starts making is so incompatible wi

RE: should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl?

2006-08-29 Thread Denis Souza
Just wondering... why isn't this included in the Tapestry 4/4.1 distribution? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: terça-feira, 29 de agosto de 2006 12:17 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl? My understanding is tha

Re: should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl?

2006-08-29 Thread robertz
My understanding is that tap4, internally, uses ognl much less than before. In terms of binding properties, since tap4 lets you develop custom binding mechanisms, you could always write your own replacement and plug it in. But then, Howard's already done that. :) Take a look at http://howardlewissh

Re: should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl?

2006-08-29 Thread Rui Pacheco
I believe Wicket already uses something developed by their team. On 8/29/06, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there -- I saw this post ( http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=41923) over on theserverside. It was announcing Stripes 1.4. The original post and comments

should/is Tagestry getting rid of ognl?

2006-08-29 Thread Patrick Moore
Hi there -- I saw this post (http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=41923) over on theserverside. It was announcing Stripes 1.4. The original post and comments are all refering to what a dog ognl is from a performance perspective. So I got to ask the question is Tapestry going to

RE: Underline content with properties files

2006-08-29 Thread Thomas.Vaughan
CSS has a :first-letter meta style that could do what you want. Besides, is deprecated anyway. Something like this should work: Properties file: name.key=Name CSS file: p:first-letter { text-decoration:underline; } HTML file: Name value from props file -Original Message- From: P

Re: Any ideas on a fix for TAPESTRY-825 (Cookie StateObjectPersistenceManager)?

2006-08-29 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I'll do it if someone can send in a patch or make it very clear how I'll know if the functionality is working. On 8/29/06, Robert Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has no-one got any thoughts on this? We're investigating a workaround using the PropertyPersistenceStrategy but this looks like bein

Re: ASO class not instantiated

2006-08-29 Thread Borut Bolčina
Thanks Kirby.

Re: ASO class not instantiated

2006-08-29 Thread Richard Kirby
Hi Borut State objects are not instantiated until they are first accessed. You need an @InjectState("manager") in, for example, a page. Cheers Richard Borut Bolčina wrote: Why on earth is my ASO not instantiated? package com.mycompany.posting.applic

Re: Any ideas on a fix for TAPESTRY-825 (Cookie StateObjectPersistenceManager)?

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Cole
Has no-one got any thoughts on this? We're investigating a workaround using the PropertyPersistenceStrategy but this looks like being pretty clunky compared with using the StateObjectPersistenceManager. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Rob Cole

OT : Tapestry + Eclipse validation messages

2006-08-29 Thread spamsucks
I'm using Eclipse 3.2 + WST to develop my T4 projects. During the build it tries to validate my tapestry templates and since they're not valid HTML it generates a million warnings like this one : "Invalid location of tag (link)." or this one : "Invalid location of tag (meta)." >From reading this