around 90-100 msg per min on a dual xeon 2.8
running 2.6.8-13-em64t-p4-smp with 2GB of RAM.
Simon
On 8/29/07, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon,
>
> > connect to transport spamassassin: Connection refused
>
> You do not have a transport named 'spamassassin' in Postfix master.cf file.
>
> The name of a transport comes from a content_filter
et.com/spam.txt
My config is pretty much default and I have few extra rulesets from
rulesemporium
Thanks,
Simon
as spam.
-Simon
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:00:12 -0700, jdow wrote:
>From: "Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to figure out what to do to filter these spam messages. I can't seem to
>> find a ruleset which
e not permitted.
I believe it should be very easy to write a rule set for these "work from home",
stock, mortgage, etc... short spam emails, I just don't have the expertise to do
it right.
-Simon
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:34 -0400, Billy Huddleston wrote:
>Yup.. an
t of their job.
Spamassassin has rules for majority of emails, so I don't see what's so
difficult
about adding more rules to combat these new breed of spam.
-Simon
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:12:27 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> On Mon, October 16, 2006 3:43 pm, R Lists06 said:
>>&
Why can't we simply have a new ruleset to score these short spam messages
higher?
-Simon
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:44:58 -0600, Gary V wrote:
>
>>On Oct 16, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Simon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I reviewed greylisting as a solution in the
go with this one?
Thanks
Simon
Nov 3 16:14:46 mx1 amavis[4765]: (04765-05) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace:
at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker.pm line 70\n\teval {...}
called at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker.pm line
70\n\tMail::SpamAssassin::Locker::jittery_one_second_sleep('
On 11/3/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Using spamassassin 3.1.3-0bpo1 from backports.org on debian sarge. We
> did have the standard 3.0.x sarge package. Using amavis-new to call
> spamassassin and after upgrading spamassassin we
On 11/3/06, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday November 3 2006 05:23, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I believe the option is $sa_timeout
> Not sure what the default is, probably 30. Which should be enough to
> prevent that problem, unless you have a LOT of sa instances contending
> for the
Hi There,
Looks like ive solved one issue, and another crops up!... I think that
i may need to move to a mysql storage engine here? approx 17,000
messages a day incoming on this server.
Any pointers here? - Thanks!!
Nov 4 11:39:40 mx1 amavis[32148]: (32148-07) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace:
at /usr/
Hi There,
We are running debian sarge, with postfix and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. We
have setup sa as a filter in postfix and it is now working and
'tag'ing spam correctly. What do i do to have sa delete the message
above a certain level?
Is there a preference i can set somewhere?
Thanks
Simon
at 03:21:40PM +1300, Simon wrote:
> 'tag'ing spam correctly. What do i do to have sa delete the message
> above a certain level?
>
> Is there a preference i can set somewhere?
Stand on your head and chant "SA only marks up messages". :)
ie: you can't ha
?)
Thanks!!!
Simon
On 11/10/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:31:05AM +1300, Simon wrote:
> - How do i confirm that SA is using the rulesets from sa-update?
spamassassin --lint -D
> - If i want to put in some custom ones... where is the best to do this
On 11/10/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:21:12PM +1300, Simon wrote:
> >You can put it in any files you want. /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf is read
> >last.
>
> Cool - so to build a custom rule to block emails with a subject:
&g
Hi There,
Im slowly getting there with custom rulesets... Would someone be able
to check this out and offer any help if i have it incorrect?
Email is coming in with the subject "Name wrote:", where "Name" is a
persons name.
Subject =~ /\b[a-z]+\s+wrote:/i
Thanks in advance
I was getting these spam emails with the subject "Name wrote:", so
someone suggested i update SA and run sa-update. Which i have and its
now solved that issue - nice.
But now im getting subject "hi it's Name", does someone have a custom
ruleset for this spam please? Im trying to write one myself
Hi Chris,
On 11/29/06, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 6:00 pm, Simon wrote:
> I was getting these spam emails with the subject "Name wrote:", so
> someone suggested i update SA and run sa-update. Which i have and its
> now solved that iss
Hello,
I've just installed mod_perl and Mail::SpamAssassin::Spamd::Apache2.
How can I use this as a SpamAssassin daemon for my mail server (sample
config) ?
How must I configure SpamC (command line) to use this version of SpamD ?
I need SpamAssassin using SQL database for storing users prefs,
We use invalument.com ... good for the stuff that often slips by. Your mileage
may vary, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Philipp Ewald
Sent: 18 September 2024 11:27
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: non-free Services
Hello,
>The idea is that you can use those services for f
,
Simon
sassin/local.cf <http://local.cf>*, just add
> something like this:
>
> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 0 4 0 4
> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 0 4 0 4
>
> This would add 4 points to the scoring when these rules matched.
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:28 PM Simon Harwood
> w
"
You've not stated your OS but on a RHEL/CentOS 7 box the correct way
to remove is to go to /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d and delete
sought.conf.
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
it goes, but am
interested in comments on its usefulness?
Simon
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
- Message from John Hardin -
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Hardin
Subject: Re: AWL on 3.4
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Simon Wilson wrote:
I've just migrated and updated to SA 3.4, and have moved the Bayes
as Intended (TM). I've not set txrep_autolearn on yet, will
monitor for a while.
Simon
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 3:04 AM Simon Wilson wrote:
- Message from John Hardin -
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Hardin
Subject: Re: AWL on
quick and consistent average < 0.4s
Simon
SA Timing Percentiles % TimeTotal (ms)0%
5% 25% 50% 75%
ng a Received-SPF filter using
python-policyd-spf (called as last check in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions), so yes it would make sense for
spamassassin to trust the check already made - I'll see if I can work
out how to do that.
Simon.
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
d rules, but what is best practice for
using DMARC results in Spamassassin?
Simon
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
Does SA always do its "own" DKIM check, or can it be told to use an
already written trusted AuthservId-written Authentication-Results
header, e.g. from OpenDKIM?
Thanks
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
ernal by a properly configured SpamAssassin, please open a bug
report.
Yep, been through all of that with making sure SA knows what is
internal and external, and what it can trust and not. No issues there.
Simon
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
ation (and teaching it when it
fails to get it right) resulted in excellent spam prevention on CentOS
7 with its standard packaged SA. And then you are not stepping away
from one of CentOS's main advantages - stable packages not built
outside of RPM.
Simon
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
- Message from Amir Caspi -
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:06:03 -0600
From: Amir Caspi
Subject: Re: Update SA on CentOS
To: si...@simonandkate.net
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Apr 3, 2021, at 9:15 PM, Simon Wilson wrote:
And then you are not stepping away
- Message from Bill Cole
-
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 15:16:32 -0400
From: Bill Cole
Subject: Re: Update SA on CentOS
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On 4 Apr 2021, at 0:19, Simon Wilson wrote:
CentOS / RHEL backport critical security fixes into the stock
versions
like every inbound email.
From what I can see it's a genuine blocklist lookup by SA...
(RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf) but the error rate is strange.
Am I the only one with high volume of lookup errors from that bl? :-)
or do I need to be looking for an issue locally...
Simon.
--
_50 results.
sa-learn advises tokens learned, but it still seems to struggle with
these. Other than that my Bayes is excellent, very effective and
accurate.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Simon.
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
On 19.04.21 16:36, Simon Wilson wrote:
- I'm running KAM rules in Spamassassin
- Postfix port 587-submitted email is sent to Amavisd (as a
content_filter) on port 10026 (tagged as ORIGINATING/MYNETS) and is
spam-checked and DKIM-signed on its way out the door, sent back to
Postfix at
I'd say that a proper solution would be to DKIM-sign mail before it's
spam-scanned.
On 19.04.21 19:39, Simon Wilson wrote:
Good point. If DKIM is signed it should pass DMARC, even if SPF fails.
Amavisd handles both pieces, including DKIM signing... from looking
at the headers it
- Message from RW -
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:47:02 +0100
From: RW
Subject: Re: KAM_DMARC_REJECT on internal emails
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:36:58 +1000
Simon Wilson wrote:
Hi list,
- I'm running KAM rules in Spamassassin
- Po
pamassassin ?, it have to know all wan ips for your own server /
servers
Yes, my trusted_networks, internal_networks and msa_networks are all
set correctly... I had a long discussion with this mailing list on the
subject last year and got excellent help on resolving that! :)
- End me
Hi Simon,
For info for few days now, the Senderscore DNS server is failing to
answer. I've pinged one relation I have at Validity so they can dig on
it.
Senderscore via DNS is a legacy service they just maintain but dunno
for how long... They are more on a mood to stop that service in the
f
And btw, usually on the DNS infos of Senderscores, you can see about 3
days of lag compared to their online interface, dunno if expected on
their side, or they're facing perf issues, but that service is not a
top priority at all at least
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:29 PM Simon Bressier
- Message from Henrik K -
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:11:41 +0300
From: Henrik K
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: KAM_DMARC_REJECT on internal emails
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:05:21PM +1000, Simon Wilson wrote
And btw, usually on the DNS infos of Senderscores, you can see about 3
days of lag compared to their online interface, dunno if expected on
their side, or they're facing perf issues, but that service is not a
top priority at all at least
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:29 PM Simon Bressier
e relevant milters have run and added
trusted headers on inbound email.
Simon.
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:05:21PM +1000, Simon Wilson wrote:
rather than change the channel distributed KAM.cf, what needs to go in
local.cf to tell that not to run? *CAN* it be disabled from local.cf, or can
it only be done by commenting out the entry in KAM.cf?
It would not make any se
INBOUND
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
result by applying the check_host() function to the "MAIL FROM"
identity as the .
A HELO SPF check is most certainly not a "fall-back".
Whether the SPF checking tool used follows the RFC is another matter
entirely :-)
Simon.
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
art with the easy parts and follow with those more
compliated functionality, because I feel the description starts with
thelatter.
I'm guessing from the silence in response that this will remain a mystery.
Simon.
___
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
- Message from Jared Hall -
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:07:52 -0400
From: Jared Hall
Subject: CHAOS: v1.2.2: Of Documentation
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Simon Wilson wrote:
could you, please, finally, describe what does this module do,
here to the list and/or to
is rule is triggering a lot on emails which are not Spam,
reducing score from 2.497
score SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY1.8
Simon
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
erver, the identical email takes about 4000ms.
On each server it is tests_pri_0 that takes the majority of the time,
which I understand from reading is to be expected. Is the extended
duration to be expected with newer SA, or do I need to be digging
deeper to try and find out why it's so much
ical email takes about 4000ms.
On each server it is tests_pri_0 that takes the majority of the
time, which I understand from reading is to be expected. Is the
extended duration to be expected with newer SA, or do I need to be
digging deeper to try and find out why it's so much slower?
] - but is taking a
LOT longer to complete them.
Complete timing results are below.
Is this just how long it takes now, or is there any tweaking I can be doing?
Simon
**
Full DNS timings
Old server
May 1 14:40:37.266 [14560] dbg: async: timing: 0.010 .
dns:A:us-west-2.amazonses.com
M
oes not log this data. Far too much traffic
generated!
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_data_retention#European_Union
>
>
> /Per Jessen, Zürich
>
--
Email simon AT klunky DOT co DOT uk
PGP is optional: 4BA78604
I won't accept your confidentiality
agreement, and your Emails are kept.
~Ö¿Ö~
code
that uses an assignment = {}, but often is a typo for something else
eg.
if (a = b) {...}
This is correct but sometimes the programmer might mean
if (a == b) {...}
Its pointing out a possible confusion.
The warning is pointing out that he might want the latter.
As I have demonstrated above, Go
d=5002,required_score=6.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=36238,mid=<4e6510c8.5010...@klunky.co.uk>,bayes=0.00,autolearn=no,shortcircuit=no
I wonder why spamd did not record this in spamd.log. Has anyone got any
ideas?
Simon.
--
Email simon AT klunky DOT co DOT uk
PGP
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 09/24, David Bennett wrote:
> > It occurred to me that a sender that is paying their way into my
> > inbox is almost certainly sending me junk mail. A little research
> > in my inbox and it turns out to
core, 2 threads)
1024Mb RAM
Transcend mSATA SSD 32Gb MLC
Cheers for any commentary.
Best regards, Simon.
--
Email simon AT klunky DOT co DOT uk
PGP is optional: 4BA78604
I won't accept your confidentiality
agreement, and your Emails are kept.
~Ö¿Ö~
On 10/03/2011 12:16 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.10.11 12:08, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to
>> using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes
>> are small. I won't
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Also make sure youre running a caching nameserver to help with dns requests
Drop unknown recipients at the start before SA checks really stop alot of junk
too
Martin
On Monday, 3 October 2011, Alex B. wrote:
>
>
> On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenth
On 05/10/11 12:49, Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:59:59PM -0400, Alex B. wrote:
On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi there,
I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to
using
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/12, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> I have found the problem: Google name server
>
> >On 10/11, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> >>Received: from [175.145.6.37] (unknown [175.145.6.37])
> >
> >$ host 37.6.145.175.list.dnswl.org
> >Host 37.6.145.175.list.dnswl.org not found: 3(N
Ned Slider wrote:
On 27/10/11 18:36, Jenny Lee wrote:
>
>
>
>_
>> From: list...@abbacomm.net
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: real world spamassassin experiences re: processing on servers
>> emailing from .info domains
>> Date: Thu, 27
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your
> sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically
> contradicts everything SA stands for.
I suspect the corpora and the scoring logic won't mak
replacing |europjobs.eu| with |europjobs\.eu| in
case it helped, but made no difference)
I should have thought that this would pick it up. I missed something
:( Anyone know what it was?
Cheers, S.
--
Email simon AT klunky DOT co DOT uk
PGP is optional: 4BA78604
I
On 23/11/11 15:31, Axb wrote:
> On 2011-11-23 15:13, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>
>> I have spam that hits on these rules.
>>
>> X-Spam-Report:
>> * 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
>> * [URIs: europjobs.eu]
>&g
On 23/11/11 16:21, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:13 +0100, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>> I have spam that hits on these rules.
>>
>> X-Spam-Report:
>> * 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
>> * [
On 29/11/11 15:21, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 11:21 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
>> On 11/28/2011 7:41 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:21:56 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
>>>
http://0x12.0x12.0x12.0x12/
>>> does not work in chrome
>> I tried in Chrome 16.0.912.41 beta-m and
> mostly in with some selective
> setup, clamav milter with sanesecurity, greylist, and some postscreen
> configs
>
> ix.dnsbl.manitu.net perhaps is more in interest for german/euro region
>
> that was enough ever, for most global spam, for sure
> you need analyse your logs an mak
ease rerun
with debug enabled for more information
Any starting pointers?
Cheers, S
--
PGP is optional: 4BA78604
simon @ klunky . org
simon @ klunky . co.uk
I won't accept your confidentiality
agreement, and your
Version 3.3.1 on Debian Squeeze
--
Dogs are tough.
I've been interrogating this one for hours and he still won't tell me who's a
good boy.
simon@klunky / .co.uk / .org
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
>On 2/3/2012 5:00 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>> Hi,
&g
version eval stuff we've been trying to push out.
>
> On 2/3/2012 2:35 PM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>
>> Yep, fails on standard rules.
>>
>> ( Excuse the slightly messy copy and paste, but I am using ConnectBot on a
>> smartphone whilst travelling on
: 4BA78604
simon @ klunky . org
simon @ klunky . co.uk
I won't accept your confidentiality
agreement, and your Emails are kept.
~Ö¿Ö~
On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100
> Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>
>
>> Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes
>> seems reasonably well trained. It works well.
>>
>> I noticed that emails that did
On 27/02/12 15:24, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100
>> Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes
>>> seems reasonably well trained.
On 27/02/12 15:29, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> On 27/02/12 15:24, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>> On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100
>>> Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Recently I enabled shortcircuit for
It was a last minute decision.
Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
>Ha. Nice
>
>
>--
>Jeremy McSpadden
>
>On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:38 AM, "Michael Scheidell"
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/2/12 11:36 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> just a note to whom it might concern :)
>>>
>> phisting?
>>
>> OUCH.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mich
Hi,
Were these rules, or an improved variant, added to the rules?
Regards, Simon.
On 16/02/12 01:43, neon_overload wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created some rules which I have found to be very effective so far at
> identifying a certain type of spam that spamassassin other
On 09/03/12 11:29, FC Mario Patty wrote:
> I'm sorry for not giving full information before.
>
> We set our mail server to use SMTP with TLS (port 587) and the
> outgoing server (of the mail client on android smart phone) as our
> server itself (in other words, not relaying through the provider
> s
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've been following this thread... not sure how many of you are aware
>of
>this project:
>
>http://code.google.com/p/anti-phishing-email-reply/
>
>We use the phishing address list and it does catch a few things. We
>don't yet use the phishing URL list, but it look
Paul Russell wrote:
>On 3/12/2012 12:58, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>
>> At first glance:
>> This is private black list of email assesses maintened by many. Free
>to use, but it'll turn into a huge file for a server to parse.
>>
>> Eventually we m
|sucabikes\.com\.ar|mpe-export\.com|eceurop\.com|cdromland\.nl|buyshield\.com)/
scoreRBODY_PDOMAINS1 5.0
SA version is 3.3.1-1 running on Debian Squeeze.
Something ought to have changed, because I swear these custom rules
works last month.
Regards, Simon
--
PGP is optional
Indeed I certainly can.
http://pastebin.com/c2an4irw
On 23/03/12 13:44, Banyan He wrote:
> Maybe you can share with us the debug output for the second thought in
> this case, Simon.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Banyan He
> Blog: http://www.rootong.com
> Email:
; /path/to/sampler
>
> What did you see here then?
>
>
> Banyan He
> Blog: http://www.rootong.com
> Email: ban...@rootong.com
>
>
> On 2012-03-23 8:49 PM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>> Indeed I certainly can.
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/c2an4
spamc
>> run?
>>
>> spamc -y -R < /path/to/sampler
>>
>> What did you see here then?
>>
>>
>> Banyan He
>> Blog: http://www.rootong.com
>> Email: ban...@rootong.com
>>
>>
>> On 2012-03-23 8:49 PM, Simon Loewenthal wrote
Hi,
Are these options still valid for
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop settings in the local.cf
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SpamCop.html
(from spamcop.net http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/331.html ).
*It is recommended the default settings in Sp
On 11/04/12 15:30, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are these options still valid for
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop settings in the local.cf
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SpamCop.html
>
> (from spamcop.net http://spamco
On 04/12/2012 12:58 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Den 2012-04-11 15:37, Simon Loewenthal skrev:
>
>> Partially answered.
>> # spamassassin --lint
>> Apr 11 15:35:06.700 [24545] warn: config: failed to parse line,
>> skipping, in "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf&q
Hi,
SA does not store spam. It scans it. It is up to your to decide what to do with
it.
I send mine to Dovecot for delivery to the users' mailboxes.
S
--
Dogs are tough.
I've been interrogating this one for hours and he still won't tell me who's a
good boy.
simon@kl
Hi
I have Bayes correctly scoring BAYES_99 on Dutch and French straight out of
the box. No problems.
--
Dogs are tough.
I've been interrogating this one for hours and he still won't tell me who's a
good boy.
simon@klunky / .co.uk / .org
John Hardin wrote:
>On Mon,
>... for their own protection.
What do we need protection from?
s
--
Dogs are tough.
I've been interrogating this one for hours and he still won't tell me who's a
good boy.
simon@klunky / .co.uk / .org
jonathonb wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Some interesting responses
Evening all,
A great majority of our ham starts with Dear Sir/ Dear Madam / Dear Bob.
Therefore I've always wondered why this this is scored so highly:
* 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
Does anyone know the rational behind this, or is our user base simply
communicating
Except for formal letters to administrative addresses.
Dear Bob was a frivolous and incorrect example. It is really Sir/Madam
As Alex noted, I coils score it lower,bit am concerned on the overall effect.
I'lltest first.
Cheers.
RW wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:47:20 +0200
>Simon
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>
>But more importantly, it's because we do not have have the rule
>hit statistics from your email ..
Which has been on my personal backlog for over a year. (It is self-serving &
should have a higher priority thus) .
Hi Mark,
maybe this works. This I stole it from someone who posted
here.
# HTML - White text on a white background. What is the
point?
rawbody HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT /style=.color#FFF;/
describe
HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT White html txt on white bg
score
HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT 0.1
Simon
---
&q
^s*([a-z_-]+)s*:s*(S.*?)s*$/i) {
#
"display: none", "visibility: hidden", etc.
$new{'style_'.$1} = $2;
}
}
}
sa-learn still exits with a zero.
Does any one know what may
have tripped this up? Is it a bug, or some strange formatting in the
email message?
Mark Martinec wrote:
>Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>> > Just notcied sa-learn kick up a fuss with some files fed into
>> > it from a user's HAM directory in a dovecot directory.
>> >
>> > I put a copy of
>> > the ham on http://pastebin.com/MLEh
performance related dependencies on other
packages? Currently, Perl is 5.10.1-17squeeze4.
Regards, S
--
"I
decided that I was a lemon for a couple of weeks. I kept myself amused
all that time jumping in and out of a gin and tonic."
simon@klunky
.co.uk / .org
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
