We use invalument.com ... good for the stuff that often slips by. Your mileage may vary, etc.
-----Original Message----- From: Philipp Ewald <philipp.ew...@digionline.de> Sent: 18 September 2024 11:27 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: non-free Services Hello, >The idea is that you can use those services for free if you are a small >user (spam filter for me and my dog) but if you start to look like a >commercial service yourself, you need to pay your part. Yes we use commercial. We allready paying SURBL because we got a information about limits. Thanks i will check them and if we will hit limits. > Some RBL are cheaper. Some are open to deals when you share data. Some > are worth every penny of their expensive plans. Some good RBL are not in > standard spamassassin Some recommendations? many thnaks Am 18.09.24 um 12:18 schrieb Laurent S.: > On 18.09.24 11:37, Philipp Ewald wrote: >> Hello,, >> >> im searching for all non-free comercial services in Spamassasin. >> >> >> ATM i found: >> dns_query_restriction deny sorbs.net >> dns_query_restriction deny bl.mailspike.net >> dns_query_restriction deny wl.mailspike.net >> Spamcop (ZEN) >> >> Does i need to disable other services as well? >> cant find any official information. >> >> >> We have high mail volume so "free" use is not possilbe. >> >> >> Kind regards >> Philipp > Depending on the amount to traffic you have, dnswl.org, uribl.com, > surbl.org will also start blocking your requests. If you monitor > spamassassin hits for RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, URIBL_BLOCKED or > SURBL_BLOCKED, you'll know you are above limits. > > The idea is that you can use those services for free if you are a small > user (spam filter for me and my dog) but if you start to look like a > commercial service yourself, you need to pay your part. > > Some RBL are cheaper. Some are open to deals when you share data. Some > are worth every penny of their expensive plans. Some good RBL are not in > standard spamassassin. I'd advise you to make sure you still have a > decent amount of RBL still active. > > Best, > Laurent >
