On 27/02/12 15:29, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> On 27/02/12 15:24, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>> On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100
>>> Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>     Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes
>>>> seems reasonably well trained. It works well.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit)
>>>> were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the
>>>> autolearn threshold of -1.
>>>>
>>>> In the example below, the score was -7.8.  Below this, the bayes
>>>> settings in the local.cf are listed.  A score of beneath -1 should
>>>> have been autolearnt. 
>>>>
>>>> No, score=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
>>>> RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URI_HEX
>>>> shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
>>>> ...
>>>> Ham that shortcircuits has autolearn=disabled, which makes sense to me
>>>> as it is already in Bayes.
>>> Correctly identified isn't the same as "in Bayes", it's presumably
>>> because its not considered safe to autolearn on a incomplete set
>>> of rules.
>>>
>>> autolearn=unavailable means that there was some problem with
>>> accessing Bayes - note that there is no BAYES_* hit at all in the test
>>> list, it's not just that it lacks BAYES_00. 
>>>
>>> I think this might be due to an auto-expiry. Try setting 
>>> "bayes_auto_expire  0"    and running "sa-learn  --force-expire"  from
>>> cron in the middle of the night. This is considered best-practice in
>>> any case.
>> BAYES_00 and BAYES_99 hit on other ham/spam without any problem. Only
>> then the result will mention autolearn=disabled instead of
>> autolearn=unavailable.  I don't follow why it would be unavailable for
>> non-shortcirtcuited emails, but disabled for shortcircuited emails.
>> It has to have accessed the Bayes dB in order to score with
>> BAYES_00/50/99.
>>
>> Best time me to run sa-learn  --force-expire is this evening, as only
>> US time zones are using the server. The main users are in Oceania and
>> the EU.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> S
>>
>> -- 
> Hi RW,
>
>     Being impatient, I just ran the autoexpire.  New Email still has the
> same disabled or unavailable message, so no change.
>
> # /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
> Restarting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: spamd.
> # sa-learn  --force-expire
> # sa-learn  --force-expire --username=spamd      (did it with the
> username=spamd specified as I forgot above)
> #
> # sa-learn  --dump magic
> 0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000          0       1555          0  non-token data: nspam
> 0.000          0      14622          0  non-token data: nham
> 0.000          0     527466          0  non-token data: ntokens
> 0.000          0 1308090923          0  non-token data: oldest atime
> 0.000          0 1330350454          0  non-token data: newest atime
> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last journal
> sync atime
> 0.000          0 1330352706          0  non-token data: last expiry atime
> 0.000          0   22118400          0  non-token data: last expire
> atime delta
> 0.000          0       1041          0  non-token data: last expire
> reduction count
>
I just noticed that something came through and was learnt :)

No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_FRT_COCK,T_KHOP_FOREIGN_CLICK,
T_REMOTE_IMAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.1

Fantastic.

-- 
             PGP is optional: 4BA78604
             simon @ klunky  .     org
             simon @ klunky  .   co.uk
        I won't accept your confidentiality
        agreement, and your Emails are kept.
                       ~Ö¿Ö~

Reply via email to