On 11/01/12 12:38, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 11.01.2012 12:28, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
>> community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings.
>> We are currently using:
>>
>> Barracuda
>> SpamRats
>> JunkEmailFilter
>> SpamEatingMonkey
Hi,
I use JunkEmailFilter and SpamHaus with Postfix on the front-end.
reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.2,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Blocks most of the spam sent to us. Not knowingly had an FP, and no
one has complained (of course I should never know;)
I won't use xen. (or pbl) as I do not wish to penalise people who wish
to run their own email servers on their home networks (e.g SOHO or
hobbyists). But this is a matter of principle and I have the impression
most use xen/pbl .spamhaus.org
Additionally I use clamav-milter with SaneSecurity, and spamass-milter
with Postfix. Did you consider using these? These are both easy to set-up.
> never used this
>
>> Plus the standard ones that are checked with SpamAssassin. We are also
>> about to trial Invaluement.
>>
>> Any help is gratefully appreciated.
>> --
>> Thanks, Phil
>>
> beside spamassassin
>
> i use this rbls with postfix
>
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
>
> mostly in with some selective
> setup, clamav milter with sanesecurity, greylist, and some postscreen
> configs
>
> ix.dnsbl.manitu.net perhaps is more in interest for german/euro region
>
> that was enough ever, for most global spam, for sure
> you need analyse your logs an make special setups related to ips
> ,domains etc sometimes
>
--
PGP is optional: 4BA78604
simon @ klunky . org
simon @ klunky . co.uk
I won't accept your confidentiality
agreement, and your Emails are kept.
~Ö¿Ö~
