John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your > sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically > contradicts everything SA stands for. I suspect the corpora and the scoring logic won't make it have much effect anyway, if it makes the promotion criteria. I'll leave it in for one masscheck cycle just to see how it does. I agree with R about SMTP-time reject of those domains. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 _____________________________________________ "Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here." -- Peter da Silva in a.s.r _____________________________________________ Today: Daylight Saving Time ends in U.S. - Fall Back Hi, Agree with smtp rejects, & this not being in the ruleset ; Sledgehammer approach :( Rdgs, S -- If you cannot beat them, try to côntrole them.
