Am Montag, 25. Juli 2005 10:50 schrieb christophe:
> Le lundi 25 Juillet 2005 01:05, jdow a écrit :
> > christophe, you DO know that "cat spam" merely prints out your raw
> > spam file so it should not have any markup in it.
> > If you want to view a permanent marked up file you need to run:
> > sp
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2005 17:05 schrieb Sven Riedel:
> Hi,
> I've thrown together a perl script to show me where SA rules hit a mail by
> highlighting and colorizing the given areas, after looking for and not
> finding a similar tool. I originally did this to see where false positives
> come from w
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 08:15 schrieb jdow:
> There generally is no specific procmail log file. It is generally in one
> of the mail log files in /var/log/.
Yes. But you can create user user specific lof file with
LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmail.log
Thomas
--
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de
pg
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 01:10 schrieb jdow:
> From: "Mark Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 7/21/05, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0100:
> > > The issue is how I get
> > > procmail to put SPAM mail in $HOME/mail/spam for each of t
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 18:49 schrieb Mark Williams:
[ .. ]
>
> Please don't get too hung up on the decisions that have been made -
> they are out of my control (hence my not going into depth on them). I
> only mentioned it to avoid people saying install this and install that
> or install IMA
r has been discussed regulary. Since 3.0.0 the token is in a not
readable hash value.
Regards
Thomas Arend
>
> thank
>
> Andrea
--
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de
pgpbJGguUKceB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 02:41 schrieb Robert Menschel:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Thursday, February 24, 2005, 2:42:03 AM, you wrote:
>
> TA> Hello,
>
> TA> I got lots of messages with subjects of the form:
> TA> Subject: =?utf-8?q?Wholesale Rolex Watc?=
> TA> =?utf-8?q?hes?=
> TA> Also mail Address
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 02:29 schrieb Robert Menschel:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Thursday, February 24, 2005, 1:51:53 AM, you wrote:
> >> SA has now re-created everything; only, now I have no
> >> bayes_journal any more at all:
>
> TA> Why didn't you try sa-learn --force-expire
> TA> This should red
Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 19:12 schrieb Matt Kettler:
> At 05:42 AM 2/24/2005, Thomas Arend wrote:
> >I got lots of messages with subjects of the form:
> >
> >Subject: =3D?utf-8?q?Wholesale Rolex Watc?=3D
> > =3D?utf-8?q?hes?=3D
> >
> >Also mail
Hello,
I got lots of messages with subjects of the form:
Subject: =?utf-8?q?Wholesale Rolex Watc?=
=?utf-8?q?hes?=
Also mail Addresses use this type of obfuscation.
My Question: How are thes character set changes handled by SpamAssassin rules
and bayesian filtering.
Best regards
Thomas
Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 08:23 schrieb Mark:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: donderdag 24 februari 2005 3:28
> > To: Mark
> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: How to purge bayes?
> >
> > Don't purge/reinit the fil
Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2005 16:04 schrieb Robert Fitzpatrick:
> Yes, I got a hold of one and it score 24 points using 'spamassassin -t'
> and considered spam as only 5 points were required, but ended up in my
> inbox. I am running amavisd-new with Postfix, how do I tell if
> spamassassin is even
Am Samstag, 19. Februar 2005 17:13 schrieb Matt Florido:
> Matt Florido wrote:
> > John Fleming wrote:
> >> On Friday 18 February 2005 12:53 pm, Tracey Gates wrote:
> >>> I downloaded the .cf files from the rulesemporium.com site but I don't
> >>> know what to do with them. Do I just place them in
Am Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2005 09:47 schrieb Hans-Georg Gloeckler:
> I use spamassassin version 2.64, SuSE 8.2 and qmail.
>
> I get the following problem:
> Argument_"\010862517M->U^TB"_isn't_numeric_in_numeric_gt_(>)_a
> t_/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm_line_1260.
Am Freitag, 18. Februar 2005 19:01 schrieb John Fleming:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 12:53 pm, Tracey Gates wrote:
> > I downloaded the .cf files from the rulesemporium.com site but I don't
> > know what to do with them. Do I just place them in the same folder as
> > my local.cf and SpamAssassin
Am Freitag, 18. Februar 2005 10:11 schrieb Gray, Richard:
> Does anyone have a good ruleset for catching all this fake watch spam?
My rules can be found here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=329#post329
There is also a mass check with a former version.
Thomas
>
> I
t that mean that the expiration system that SA employs solves that
> problem?
No. Expiration only reduces the size of the database. It drops unused tokens,
which for a long time didn't apear in a message. So if you don't train spam
you will have no spamy tokens anymore whic
r real spam ham ratio, train as much as possible (= train
all
messages), but never train to less ham or train only spam!
(BTW: The risk of a False Positives is the reason why Paul Graham multiplied
his token counts for ham with 2)
Another lesson should be: Never train whitelisted mails as h
r real spam ham ratio, train as much as possible (= train
all
messages), but never train to less ham or train only spam!
(BTW: The risk of a False Positives is the reason why Paul Graham multiplied
his token counts for ham with 2)
Another lesson should be: Never train whitelisted mails as h
Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 23:13 schrieb Daniel Cañas:
> On Feb 14, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Thomas Arend wrote:
> > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:50 schrieb Daniel Cañas:
> >> I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to
> >> sa-learn..
> >
[.
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 22:08 schrieb Chris Santerre:
> >I have autolearned disabled in my SpamAssassin config.
> >
> >I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM
> >(no question
> >about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these
> >accounts and feds
> >them in to
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 21:54 schrieb Austin Weidner:
> I have autolearned disabled in my SpamAssassin config.
>
> I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM (no question
> about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these accounts and
> feds them in to sa-learn as
Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:50 schrieb Daniel Cañas:
> I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to
> sa-learn..
You should train them as ham.
>
> The emails are all mine (that is they are addresed to me) is this a
> problem for sa-learn?
Where is the problem? If they
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 17:58 schrieb Matt Kettler:
> At 11:15 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
> >The sa-learn man page says that for a good training of the Bayesian
> >filter, you need to train it with equal amounts of spam and ham, or more
> >ham if is possible. So if I sa-learn th
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 19:29 schrieb Matias Lopez Bergero:
> Hi,
>
> I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the
> bayes db and the awl db.
> I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user
> there is an .spamassassin directory, storing Baye
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:17 schrieb Peter Marshall:
> but would that not mean that the bayes filter will learn the headers
> that spam assassin adds as spam .. and then after a while only start
> classing mail that already has the spam headers as bayes_99 ?
>
> I really do not know, I am jus
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 22:46 schrieb Jim Maul:
> Mike Jackson wrote:
> >> http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
> >
> > I sent it to myself...
> >
> > X-Spam-Report:
> > * 1.8 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
> > * 0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
> > * 0.7
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 08:14 schrieb Sharma, Ravi:
> Its require when you rebuild the database.
That's not true. See the message from Matt.
Bayes is a statistical methode so the best way is to train all spam and ham.
But you should not train it on messages you whitelist for example with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 5. Februar 2005 12:52 schrieb Steve Dondley:
> Thanks, Thomas. Did I do the right thing by soft linking the files?
>
Hello Steve,
if both user have read and write access it should work. But there are
better means to share bayes DB in sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 4. Februar 2005 22:49 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It looks like spamassassin is trying to parse the Postfix master.cf
> file.
Yes, it looks like.
> The machine was running fine for several months. This morning I
> copied over some c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 4. Februar 2005 22:57 schrieb Steve Dondley:
> Hi,
>
> I've been feeding spamassassin spam and ham. But the Bayesian filter is
> not having any effect on my e-mail account. Now, I've been feeding the
> bayesian filter logged in as one use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 17:07 schrieb Thorsten Haude:
[..]
>
> The manpage tells me that the fourth column is used when "network
> tests are enabled". However, I couldn't find anything (neither in the
> FAQ nor in the docs) about what these netwo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 19:20 schrieb Tony Lay:
> Hey Gang,
>
> I am trying to establish system wide spam filtering, but only a few
> users need it right now. So I have the flexibility to go either way.
> I think that's where my problem stemsâI m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 05:48 schrieb Walter Jeffries:
> I often get spam in that to me looks extremely spammy.
> Yet SA doesn't seem to think much of it and pass it with
> little to no comment. Below is a very typical example.
> The only thing SA
aybe not helpful.
(Rolex Watches come through if you don't have additional rules.)
Have you enabled network tests. SA 3.0.x relies heavily on network tests.
A little bit more information may help to find the problem.
Regards
Thomas Arend
>
>
> Damir Cosic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 21. Januar 2005 16:35 schrieb Frank M. Cook:
>
>
> how is this controlled in version 3? We had the network tests turned off
> in version 2 but after upgrading to version 3 it is taking 45 seconds to
> process each message and the reports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 16. Januar 2005 14:00 schrieb Zé:
> Em Sábado, 15 de Janeiro de 2005 16:04, Matt Kettler escreveu:
> > At 10:54 AM 1/15/2005, Zé wrote:
> > >I use mandrake with kde-3.3.2.
> > >After i installed spamassassin-spamc-3.0.2-1mdk stoped classifi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 21. Januar 2005 14:30 schrieb John Fleming:
> Since upgrading v2.64 to 3.0.2, I have a much higher false negative rate.
> I posted one a couple of days ago that involved a "trusted" issue. I just
> got a medication-spam this morning that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 21:35 schrieb alexander hachmann:
> Hello,
> I am using Spamassassin 2.63 with SQL-Configuration.
> When I want to redefine scores in my local.cf it simply does not work. The
> new Score i am setting will not be used.
>
> sco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 06:34 schrieb Loren Wilton:
> > Probably want to nuke punctuation and capitalization before doing
> > the sort. I'm too braindead at the moment, but some perl incantation
> > might be the way to go, or if you're old school t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 19:56 schrieb John Fleming:
> > The Bayes_9x scores were a bit low for our needs. So we bumped them
> > up. That is one of the great things I like about SA. You can customize
> > it to meet your needs.
> >
> > Shane
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 15:34 schrieb Guillaume Urbejtel:
> Hi All,
>
> For some days BAYES probabilty jump for almost all messages, i've
> BAYES_50 for almost all message including ham...
> What can be the reason ?
>
> Thanks for your help !
I hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 16. Januar 2005 15:52 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Finaly got bayes to work, default fedora core 3 lacks some configurations,
> did alot of read about bayes but one thing i dont undertend. Do i have to
> provide bayes all the spam manualy o
try "man Mail::Spamassassin::Conf" or http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
Bayes is enabled by use_bayes 1 (default in 3.0.x) but it fires only if you
have feed at least 200 ham and 200 spam messages to sa-learn.
Thomas Arend
[..]
- --
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
under some thousands. It would be a big task to adjust
all entries.
Your entry would be changed with the next trained message containing this
token.
Eding entries would be not posible in 3.0.x because the tokens are store as
SHA1 codes.
Regards
Thomas Arend
[..]
- --
icq:133073900
htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2005 18:52 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello,
>
> I have two mailservers one running amavis + spamassasin 2.x and the other
> running spamassasin 3 as a filter from maildrop. The maildrop+ spamassim
> 3.x let more spam get thro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2005 13:04 schrieb Loren Wilton:
> Well, it obviously was scored correctly, and showed at least some headers
> indicating this. So SA must be doing its job.
>
> Since SA isn't in charge of deciding what to DO with the mail once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2005 21:42 schrieb Hans du Plooy:
> I was wondering what method you guys & gals prefer for upgrading
> spamassassin on the more mainstream rpm based distros (MDK/Fedora/rh/SUSE).
>
> I have a SUSE 9.1 server, running spamassassi
how can i test if sa-learn learns the spam/ham mails right.
What do you mean by "right". With this commands ham is learned as ham and spam
is learned as ham.
>
> below are the executed commands:
> /usr/bin/spamassassin -r -d -a
> /usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --sin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2005 12:47 schrieb Joe Zitnik:
> We've been having a group of the same type of e-mails making it through
> spamassassin. These are the e-mails that have the "get a capable html
> e-mailer" line in them. I have yet to see any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 22:55 schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
> On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:47 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
[..]
> > Train spam as spam, train ham as ham. Let the statistics deal with the
> > overlap. By trying to avoid training "spamish" ham o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 03:15 schrieb nadim:
> HI,
>
[..]
> The spam I get consist of a one single image. Is there something I can do
> to mark them?
I got not so many of these. I inspected one an it got a high score of 31.5
points. Question back:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 3. Januar 2005 16:47 schrieb Rodney Richison:
> I'd like to make sure I've got this right.
> To edit an existing rule like 20_dnsbl_tests.cf , I copy the rule to the
> /etc/spamassassin directory, then edit as I please like so..
Yes. But yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have received a FalsePositive because arcor.de got into trhe blocklists.
Has someone informations why arcor.de got into the blocklist?
Thanks,
Thomas
Here is the report:
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule
t's the best way to whitelist
before SA.
With procmai you can use something like:
:0 fw
* ! ^List-Id: \
| /usr/bin/spamc
Regards
Thomas Arend
- --
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB0lO8He2ZLU3NgHsRAhZoAJ964kM
.
There are a lot of rules. Maybe it would not save much processing cycles.
For proper working of the baysian filter you should reach the auto_learn
threshold.
Regards
Thomas Arend
[]
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Paul Fries
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- --
icq:133073900
http://www.t-aren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 17:21 schrieb Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina:
> On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 15:34 +0100, Thomas Arend wrote:
> > score BAYES_99 0 0 4.070 4.070 # or as high as you suggest.
>
> uh! What man page should I rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 15:34 schrieb jdow:
> From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2004 22:01 schrieb jdow:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 15:41 schrieb Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina:
> Hello,
> I see that in SA 3x, the scores have changed.
> I would like to increase/decrease the scores of come criterias.
> Espacielly the BAYES_99 test.
>
> My /etc/spamassa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2004 22:01 schrieb jdow:
> From: "Morris Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Kevin Curran wrote:
> > > Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on
> > > whether spamassassin or spamc is called.
> > >
> > > What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2004 08:08 schrieb Kevin Curran:
> Hello list,
>
> I don't know about you all,
Well, we don't no anything about your installation.
> but I've been getting a lot of false negatives
> that have a hit on the ALL_TRUSTED test.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 24. Dezember 2004 04:33 schrieb Andy Norris:
> Okay, if someone's feeling really holiday generous, maybe they can help me
> out here... I'm having some problems whitelisting some mailing lists (this
> one, for instance!) and some other mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 20:47 schrieb Jeff Ramsey:
> Per the advice of Loren, I have started my bayes db over. And so far so
> good. SA is working like I wanted it to. I have another question about
> my learnspam script. Here is the script:
>
[.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 18:14 schrieb Ryan Pavely:
> Well your email did bring me to an interesting observation.
> I am using SpamC for SA 3.0, and had upgraded from SA 2.63
>
> Notice the layout of my error message.. although ALL machines tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 12:42 schrieb Martin Hepworth:
> Thomas
>
> what extra rules above the standard SA ones have you got? Any from
> www.rulesemporium.com ?
I have only the standard rules from SA 3.0.2
>
> also have you got the URI rbl's t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm geting a lot of spam messages about rolex watches (see example below),
which were not scored as spam. Only the bayes test applies, which gives only
a score of 4.1
Thomas
Example Message:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[..]
X-Origin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 10:44 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello, I just installed the latest 3.0.2 and when testing found that spamc
> doesnt do anything to the message but just process it through as text and
> does not format it. It:s the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 23:44 schrieb Thomas Arend:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 12:54 schrieb boka:
> > Hi !
> >
> > I have few users which if the email is spam it has to be delivered to
> > theirs mailboxes.
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 12:54 schrieb boka:
> Hi !
>
> I have few users which if the email is spam it has to be delivered to
> theirs mailboxes.
>
> I used "whitelist_to" parametr but there are some meassages which are
> blocked.
>
> From docs:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 20:43 schrieb email builder:
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to offload SA to a machine that is not my main MX server.
> I have two machines, two NIC cards and a crossover cable, but after that I
> get very lost. I believ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 14:06 schrieb Rodney Green:
> Hello. I have more than the required 200 spam/200 ham in my bayes db.
> When I add a spam message with sa-learn should SA now tag as spam,
> any message that comes in with the same content? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 16:41 schrieb Jerry Bell:
> There's a big review of anti-spam products at nw fusion here:
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2004/122004spampkg.html?ts
> Here's a bit on spamassassin:
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2004/1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 14:36 schrieb Rich:
> Nobody commented on the first mention of this so I'm repeating it:
>
> I move low-scoring but real spam to a folder and then run salearn on it.
> Some messages trigger the following error:
>
> Parsing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 16:04 schrieb Michael Parker:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 11:21:19PM -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
[..]
> As of 3.0 the bayes tokens are stored as a part of an SHA1 hash on the
> original token string. So, there is no way to e
Am Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 17:13 schrieb shane mullins:
> Thanks Ronan,
>
> When I run Spamassasin -D --lint, I get the following:
>
> debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes DB <
> 200
>
> If I could get my >200 spam/ham's in there, then I could start using
> Bayes
75 matches
Mail list logo
