-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2004 22:01 schrieb jdow:
> From: "Morris Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Kevin Curran wrote:
> > > Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on
> > > whether spamassassin or spamc is called.
> > >
> > > What's up with that?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > You probably need to stop spamd and restart it so it rereads the .cf
>
> files.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Mojo
>
> Do remember that just before Christmas break I characterized a vaguely
> similar problem with spamd. With per user rules enabled any given
> spamd instance works perfectly the first time. The second time it will
> appear to pick up the user rules but not the user scores. This is run
> as the user with "DROPPRIVS" in the .procmailrc or as the user running
> spanc. It is 100% repeatable here. Fortunately there is at the moment
> only one user of the two here moved over to the new installation. So
> moving to a direct spamassassin call seems to have eliminated the
> problem, for now. I am waiting for someone to say they also can see
> this effect. Then I'll go to the web (yuck) and file a BK report on it.
> (I don't trust or like web user interfaces. {^_-})
>
> {^_^}
I'm using SuSE 9.1 (latest updates) SA 3.0.2 with postfix, /etc/procmail and
spamd/spamc. I get exactly the same scores (disregarding the AWL) for
spamassassin and spamc/spamd.
Thomas
- --
icq:133073900
aim:tawhv
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB0TVwHe2ZLU3NgHsRAmFsAJ4mXt19fw964EBtWb2vtgoOVQuD1gCfQyHE
6M2ErC1I6lxB17y6W52CcxU=
=4AxT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
