On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
DeVeDe produces a good .iso file and then offers to burn it with brasero.
Brasero will burn it, but the result is "incompatible" with my DVD player,
Trying to burn it directly with brasero produces "unknown disc image type".
Burning it with wodim did
On 12/19/24 2:07 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Does --allowerasing only remove the offending package or does it also
remove everything that has a dependency on that package as well? I've
had similar sorts of conflicts with "freeworld" packages, so I've
manually removed the freeworld package first,
On Fri, 2024-12-20 at 09:07 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Does --allowerasing only remove the offending package or does it also
> remove everything that has a dependency on that package as well? I've
> had similar sorts of conflicts with "freeworld" packages, so I've
> manually removed the freewor
call some of
them were essential for what you're trying to do, and often only
available from an external repo (which may not exist any more). You
may need to install more than just the ones you already have.
growisofs and wodim were other tools I remember using in the past. You
mention wodim
On 19/12/24 19:20, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/19/24 12:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the
On 12/19/24 12:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it s
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
> > Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
>
> I have now and it seems to have done the job.
> I
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the job.
I hadn't before because it seemed like a
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the job.
I hadn't before because it seemed like a generic suggestion,
like turn it off and on or
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
When I try to install ffmpeg,
dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
rror:
Problem: problem with installed package
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:15 PM Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
> even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
> When I try to install ffmpeg,
> dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
> rror:
>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:15 PM Michael Hennebry
wrote:
>
> When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
> even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
> When I try to install ffmpeg,
> dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
> rror:
&g
When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
When I try to install ffmpeg,
dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
rror:
Problem: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-6.1.2-1.fc40.x86_64
- package
On 12/12/24 7:53 AM, François Patte wrote:
I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed fedora
(ie. without booting from an usb stick).
You can install "anaconda-gui". I think that gives you the
François Patte composed on 2024-12-12 16:53 (UTC+0100):
> I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
> Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed fedora
> (ie. without booting from an usb stick).
Partitions and disks can be _cloned_. I do it of
On 13/12/24 02:53, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed
fedora (ie. without booting from an usb stick).
Thank you.
Theoretically yes. If you have an ISO of the Fedora
Bonjour,
I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed fedora
(ie. without booting from an usb stick).
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
On Dec 9, 2024, at 06:07, Ranjan Maitra via users
wrote:
> # # for efi-based systems: #
>
> sudo bash -x grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
Ack! Burn these instructions from your memory, this is the wrong path and can
leave your system unable to update kernels!
On any supported
EFI partition).
Sorry I am not very clear on this. Any suggestions on how to do this?
I just tested F40 in a VM. If you configure a swap partition at install
time, anaconda will set the resume parameter automatically. However, I
still had to add the "resume" module to dracut to ma
On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 09:25 +, Barry wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > If you don't have any concerns about the physical security of your computer
> > and you're only running Fedora, then very little.
>
> However if a bad actor gets your laptop they may well be able to get your
> credentials out of
On 12/10/24 1:25 AM, Barry wrote:
On 10 Dec 2024, at 04:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Got it, but what are the risks that I run by disabling it?
<#>
On 12/9/24 7:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wro
On 10 Dec 2024, at 04:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:Got it, but what are the risks that I run by disabling it?On 12/9/24 7:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:If s
On 12/9/24 7:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If secure boot is enabled, you need to encrypt the swap partition, but I
haven't had a chance to t
On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 18:56:08 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
From: Samuel Sieb
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:22:12 -0800
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no l
On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:22:12 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
on this. Any suggestions on how to do this?
I just tested F40 in a VM. If you configure a swap partition at install
time, anaconda will set the resume parameter automatically. However, I
still had to add the "resume" module to dracut to make it work.
If secure boot is enabled, y
On 12/9/24 3:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 3:05 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after
it becomes stable, my plan is to
Ranjan Maitra:
> > Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after
> > it becomes stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
Joe Zeff:
> You might want to think that over because all it takes is one typo and
> you'll probably lose your train of thought before it comes back f
On Mon Dec09'24 03:45:25PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> From: Joe Zeff
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:45:25 -0700
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
On 12/9/24 3:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 3:05 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after
it becomes stable, my plan is to
On 12/9/24 3:05 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it becomes
stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
You might want
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
> > Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it
> > becomes stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
>
> You might want to think that over because all it t
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it becomes
stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
You might want to think that over because all it takes is one typo and
you'll probably lose your train of thought
On Mon Dec09'24 10:02:06PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 22:02:06 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 11:10 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I do not have anything other than Fedora installed. It seems to me to be
> strange that it reliably comes back the first time, but not in future times.
> Something is being triggered from the second time on. It could have been H/
On Mon Dec09'24 04:32:00PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:32:00 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no
nity support for Fedora users
> > Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> > hibernate?
> >
> > On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 06:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > > I don't understand what this could be, and wonder what the i
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:57 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty confused
> with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition because I want a very
> big /home, and a reasonable /
>
> In the old past, several it
On Mon Dec09'24 12:38:54PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:38:54 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 06:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I don't understand what this could be, and wonder what the issue could be?
Check the journal, e.g. 'journalctl -g hibernate'. Maybe also:
$ systemctl list-units --failed
followed by:
$ systemctl status for any failed units.
p
On Mon Dec09'24 05:07:31AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: Ranjan Maitra via users
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 05:07:31 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Cc: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: n
ifier=%N
User=root
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/bin/bash -c ' \
if ! swapon --show=NAME --noheadings | grep -q /dev/zram0; then \
swapon /dev/zram0; \
fi; \
exit 0; \
'
[Install]
WantedBy=hibernate.target
You put those in the appropriate places a
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 10:36:52 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 20:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 20:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Thanks! So, should I not bother with setting up a swap partition? And is
> hibernate supposed to work out of the box automagically? (I am talking of F41
> if it matters.)
>
> Many thanks again, and best wishes,
Again, hibernati
users
Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
hibernate?
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:57 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty
confused with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition
because I want a
On Mon Dec09'24 01:19:58PM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: Tim via users
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 13:19:58 +1030
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Cc: Ranjan Maitra , Tim
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: n
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:57 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty
> confused with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition
> because I want a very big /home, and a reasonable /
It's been a while since I did it, but I th
Hi,
I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty confused
with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition because I want a very big
/home, and a reasonable /
In the old past, several iterations ago, I used to create a separate swap
partition (twice the size of RAM
Barry,
On 2024-12-08 00:57, Barry wrote:
On 7 Dec 2024, at 04:14, Philip Rhoades via users
wrote:
Does an in-place upgrade handle major changes in Postgresql and, more
importantly, Podman now? - if so, how does it do it?
Podman implements the container standard.
As such I would not expect
> On 7 Dec 2024, at 04:14, Philip Rhoades via users
> wrote:
>
> Does an in-place upgrade handle major changes in Postgresql and, more
> importantly, Podman now? - if so, how does it do it?
Podman implements the container standard.
As such I would not expect that an update of podman could br
> Am 07.12.2024 um 05:13 schrieb Philip Rhoades via users
> :
>
> People,
>
> Years ago I got caught when there was a major change of PG and I had to go
> back to a previous version of Fedora to export the PG data so I could import
> it into the new PG on the new Fedora - so I have been rout
People,
Years ago I got caught when there was a major change of PG and I had to
go back to a previous version of Fedora to export the PG data so I could
import it into the new PG on the new Fedora - so I have been routinely
(more-or-less) doing these exports as part of my normal backup process
On 2/11/24 01:22, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:47 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
Running trigger-install scriptlet: glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning:
posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(), .wait() and .redirect2null() are deprecated,
use rpm.spawn() or rpm.execute() instead
lled that
> plugin again and got the following strange message that I have never
> seen before:
>
> Running trigger-install scriptlet:
> glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning:
>
> posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(), .wait() and .redirect2null() are
> deprecated, use rpm.spawn()
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:47 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
>
> >> Running trigger-install scriptlet:
> >> glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning: posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(),
> >> .wait() and .redirect2null() are deprecated, use rpm.spawn() or
> >> rpm.
nning trigger-install scriptlet:
glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning:
posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(), .wait() and .redirect2null() are
deprecated, use rpm.spawn() or rpm.execute() instead
This is due to the new RPM release, you can find more info here:
https://github.com/rpm-software-manag
Hi,
On Thursday 31 October 2024 22:46:29 Greenwich Mean Time Stephen Morris wrote:
> HI,
> Following Patrick's thread about dnf tracer plugin I installed that
> plugin again and got the following strange message that I have never
> seen before:
>
> >> Runn
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:28 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
> Looking at my efi environment, I have, gcdia32.efi gcdx64.efi grubia32.efi
> grubx64.efi mmia32.efi mmx64.efi shim.efi shimia32.efi and shimx64.efi. I'm
> not sure where all of these have come from unless it is because I'm running
> an AMD
HI,
Following Patrick's thread about dnf tracer plugin I installed that
plugin again and got the following strange message that I have never
seen before:
Running trigger-install scriptlet: glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning:
posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(), .wait(
On 31/10/24 10:06, Go Canes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:11 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
On 30/10/24 11:51, Go Canes wrote:
My output from efibootmgr is below. The boot order specified in the output
is the boot order specified in my motherboard bios, not the boot orders
specified in the
Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 09:11 (UTC+1100):
> I always wondered why there are two
> entries for Fedora in the bios boot settings (that both look to be the
> same name)
Are dates and times on the two directories the same?
What does GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR= contain?
--
Evolution as taught
ls. You installed Fedora 22, 23, 24,
25, 26, etc, and their installation installed parameters into UEFI for
how to boot them. At some stage, one install hasn't removed an older
entry. I'm sure I've had that, too, and it's annoying that an
installation just puts "Fedora&
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:11 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
> On 30/10/24 11:51, Go Canes wrote:
> My output from efibootmgr is below. The boot order specified in the
> output is the boot order specified in my motherboard bios, not the boot
> orders specified in the grub menus.
I don't think there
On 30/10/24 11:51, Go Canes wrote:
Boot0010* Fedora
HD(1,GPT,6e58cd53-8fbd-4b97-bce2-fa7c43e105f3,0x800,0x64000)/\EFI\FEDORA\SHIM.EFI424f
This is basically the same as Boot but loading shim.efi (instead
of grubx64.efi directly). I don't know why there are additional bits
after "SHIM.EFI
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 7:16 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> Cool command. Thank you!
You're welcome/
> BootCurrent:
You are currently booted using variable Boot
> Boot* fedora/boot/efi/EFI/fedora/
> HD(1,GPT,6e58cd53-8fbd-4b97-bce2-fa7c43e105f3,0x800,0x64000)/\EFI\FEDORA\GRUBX
On 10/29/24 14:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 29/10/24 14:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2
On 10/29/24 15:02, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 4:39 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
That is what I did. Did ot work:
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1 --force
If you are using UEFI, grub2-install is essentially a no-op (unless
something weird is going on). Here's why
T
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 4:39 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> That is what I did. Did ot work:
>
> # grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1 --force
If you are using UEFI, grub2-install is essentially a no-op (unless
something weird is going on). Here's why
Take a look at the o
On 29/10/24 14:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr
On 10/29/24 04:47, Jonathan Billings wrote:
The solution is to just move that directory aside and reinstlal the
`kernel-core` package.
Wait a minute. I only removed and reinstall the "kernel".
Following what you said fixed the issue. Thank you!
My new method:
1) boot using the latest insta
installed systemd-boot packages (and sdubby) or at least created that
directory, and the presence of the directory directs the kernel post-install scripts
to install into/boot/efi// instead of /boot.
That is what I did. Did ot work:
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1 --force
The solution is to just
On 10/28/24 23:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi Steve,
here aer the steps in teh link you sent:
1) boot using the latest installed kernel (in my case:
kernel-6.5.10-100.fc37.x86_64)
2) Uninstall the failed kernel packages (kernel-6.5.11-300.fc39.x86_64
et al. for me).
3) cd /boot/efi and
ence of the directory
directs the kernel post-install scripts to install into /boot/efi//
instead of /boot.
The solution is to just move that directory aside and reinstlal the
`kernel-core` package. You should now see them in /boot.
--
Jonathan Billings
--
_
.fc40.x86_64
Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub.
How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
This may be the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-ef
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr.
regards,
Steve
Hi Steve,
I tried
# grub2
On 28/10/24 09:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr.
regards,
Steve
NVMe drive require UEFI. My
shows in grub.
How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
This may be the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: This util
shows in grub.
How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
This may be the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: Th
in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
This may be the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: This utility should not be used for EFI platforms
because i
in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
This may be the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: This utility should not be used for EFI
platforms because i
the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: This utility should not be used for EFI platforms
because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot. If you real
the issue:
# mount | grep "/boot "
/dev/nvme0n1p2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: This utility should not be used for EFI platforms
because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot. If you real
ToddAndMargo via users composed on 2024-10-24 16:34 (UTC-0700):
> I am drawn away for a few days. But I though I'd send you this:
> # df -kPT /boot/efi
> Filesystem Type 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/nvme0n1p1 vfat 204580 195028 9552 96% /boot/efi
Th
the vmlinuz files in the wrong place. It sounds like there’s
something similar going on for you, a piece of the kernel package post-install
is failing.
A good thing to try is to run “dnf reinstall kernel-core” and see if you see
any errors. Also check if new files are installed in /boot and
iguration,
dnf installs the vmlinuz files in the wrong place. It sounds like there’s
something similar going on for you, a piece of the kernel package post-install
is failing.
A good thing to try is to run “dnf reinstall kernel-core” and see if you see
any errors. Also check if new files are in
On 10/23/24 23:07, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I think you are stumbling through your own self-inflicted problems on
your personal Linux installation.
You have no credibility.
I think you have no idea how to help and your ego is bruised.
--
___
users maili
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 1:07 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 10/23/24 21:26, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> $ rpm -qa kernel
> >> kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> >> kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
> >> kernel-6.11.4-201
/sda4. Reinstall the bootloader
while specifying the device node without the number:
sudo grub2-install /dev/sda
The correct output should be:
Installing for i386-pc platform.
Installation finished. No error reported.
but thought I'd ask her just in case
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> $ rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64
>
> Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub.
>
> How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Let me Google that for
Hi All,
$ rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64
Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub.
How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air con
On 10/20/24 7:18 PM, John Mellor wrote:
On 2024-10-20 17:23, Barry wrote:
On 20 Oct 2024, at 13:53, John Mellor wrote:
I have an older Fedora 40 machine that I tried to install Fedora 41
on, and got a surprise.
For a first attempt, I tried the as-documented dnf system-upgrade
steps on a
On 10/20/24 4:18 PM, John Mellor wrote:
On 2024-10-20 17:23, Barry wrote:
On 20 Oct 2024, at 13:53, John Mellor wrote:
I have an older Fedora 40 machine that I tried to install Fedora 41
on, and got a surprise.
For a first attempt, I tried the as-documented dnf system-upgrade
steps on a
On 2024-10-20 17:23, Barry wrote:
On 20 Oct 2024, at 13:53, John Mellor wrote:
I have an older Fedora 40 machine that I tried to install Fedora 41 on, and
got a surprise.
For a first attempt, I tried the as-documented dnf system-upgrade steps on a
fully working and stock Fedora 40. Upon
> On 20 Oct 2024, at 13:53, John Mellor wrote:
>
> I have an older Fedora 40 machine that I tried to install Fedora 41 on, and
> got a surprise.
>
> For a first attempt, I tried the as-documented dnf system-upgrade steps on a
> fully working and stock Fedora 40. Upon
I have an older Fedora 40 machine that I tried to install Fedora 41 on,
and got a surprise.
For a first attempt, I tried the as-documented dnf system-upgrade steps
on a fully working and stock Fedora 40. Upon reboot to actually do the
install steps, a black screen is presented and everything
The speakers that are not working are the built in laptop speakers
On 9/17/24 9:14 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 9/17/24 17:22, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 18:03:32 -0600
Sbob wrote:
Can anyone help me debug this?
Check the sound control panel and see if there are multipl
On 9/17/24 17:22, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 18:03:32 -0600
Sbob wrote:
Can anyone help me debug this?
Check the sound control panel and see if there are multiple sound devices
and pick a different default (if there is one). If there aren't multiple
devices then I'm no help :-).
1 - 100 of 2842 matches
Mail list logo
