Re: Gnome-3 workspace moves

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 02/05/2015 11:44 AM, Greg Woods wrote: > >> In F20, I used to be able to right click the title bar of a window, and >> select which workspace I wanted to move it to. Now in F21 all I get is the >> option to "Move to Workspace Down" or

Re: Gnome-3 workspace moves

On 02/05/2015 11:44 AM, Greg Woods wrote: In F20, I used to be able to right click the title bar of a window, and select which workspace I wanted to move it to. Now in F21 all I get is the option to "Move to Workspace Down" or "Move to Workspace Up". This is a big loss when I have 12 named wor

Re: Gnome-3 workspace moves

> In F20, I used to be able to right click the title bar of a window, and > select which workspace I wanted to move it to. Now in F21 all I get is the > option to "Move to Workspace Down" or "Move to Workspace Up". This is a > big > loss when I have 12 named workspaces. Is there any way to recover

Re: gnome 3 vs kde

On 04/01/14 10:16, William Biggs wrote: I would like to know witch one would you use and why gnome 3 or kde ? If I had to choose only between the two, it would be KDE. I find 'Gnome 3' practically unusable. For me though, I'm a cinnamon desktop convert. -- Ian Chapman. -- users mailing list

Re: gnome 3 vs kde

On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:16:00 -0500 William Biggs wrote: > I would like to know witch one would you use and why gnome 3 or kde ? > Neither DE like beauty is in the "Eyes of the Beerholder" ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: gnome 3 vs kde

Allegedly, on or about 04 January 2014, Marko Vojinovic sent: > And I would like to know which one would you eat and why --- > chocolate or strawberry? Chocolate coated strawberry, of course. And because it's yummy. -- All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying

Re: gnome 3 vs kde

On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:16:00 -0500 William Biggs wrote: > I would like to know witch one would you use and why gnome 3 or kde ? And I would like to know which one would you eat and why --- chocolate or strawberry? :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: gnome 3 vs kde

On 01/04/2014 03:16 AM, William Biggs wrote: I would like to know witch one would you use and why gnome 3 or kde ? It comes down to personal perference so just download the Fedora 20 GNOME 3 and KDE livecd's you would like to see and boot them on a pc. It will not touch any data on the pc unl

Re: Gnome 3 & Favourite programs.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2013 02:47 PM, Bill Case wrote: > Hi; In Gnome there used to be a facility for establishing your > favourite program for basic functions. Example, to call up a > specific browser when you clicked on a link. > > I used to use Firefox as my ma

Re: gnome 3 desktop in 19

yes On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Jatin K wrote: > On Friday 04 October 2013 05:16 AM, William Biggs wrote: > > I would like to know how to make gnome 3 in fedora 19 look stranded > > > do you need FC classic mode..? > > sudo yum install gnome-classic-session > > (Reff. > https://ask.fedo

Re: gnome 3 desktop in 19

On Friday 04 October 2013 05:16 AM, William Biggs wrote: I would like to know how to make gnome 3 in fedora 19 look stranded do you need FC classic mode..? |sudo yum install gnome-classic-session (Reff. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/28958/how-do-i-enable-gnome-38-classic-mode-on-fe

Re: Re Gnome 3 groups or mailing list.

On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:07:39 -0400 Bill Case wrote: > Hi; > > I have several small Gnome 3 issues I would like help with or > discussion about. Has anybody found a good way to communicate with > gnome 3 users or developers. I belong to the following: > gnome-l...@gnome.org, > Gnome forum, > ht

Re Gnome 3 groups or mailing list.

Hi; I have several small Gnome 3 issues I would like help with or discussion about. Has anybody found a good way to communicate with gnome 3 users or developers. I belong to the following: gnome-l...@gnome.org, Gnome forum, http://forums.worldofgnome.org, over the last few days I have not recei

Re: Gnome 3 in fallback mode for no apparent reason

On 16 March 2013 01:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 16.03.2013 02:36, schrieb Sanne Grinovero: >> The only common element I see in the two systems is that both have an >> NVidia video card and I'm forced to use the proprietary drivers >> because of other issues, >> but this worked pretty well so

Re: Gnome 3 in fallback mode for no apparent reason

Am 16.03.2013 02:36, schrieb Sanne Grinovero: > The only common element I see in the two systems is that both have an > NVidia video card and I'm forced to use the proprietary drivers > because of other issues, > but this worked pretty well so far. and you are sure there was no kernel-update whi

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On 23 August 2012 16:57, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:07:10PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 08/22/2012 02:38 PM, Kernel Guardian wrote: > > >As I found in Gnome 3.4 release notes, this is default options for all > > >applications. > > > > Are you serious about this? Who in th

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On 23 August 2012 17:03, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Kernel Guardian wrote: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651075 (When I read this I > had > > the impression that someone is trying to insult my intelligence.) > > Not fixed and a lot of discussi

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

Thanks Paul. It helped a lot. I have exactly the same behavior. After Nvidia binary become XRandR compatible, I encountered the same problem (feature!!??). Before that RandR reports one monitor with 3360x1050 monitor. (i have 2 22" 1680x1050 monitor in TwinView) Also, If application window size is

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Kernel Guardian wrote: > First of all: > I have no intention to initiate a new discussion on the usefulness of the > GNOME 3 desktop environment. I just want to find a solution for my problem. > In fact, I have a huge problem with OpenGL applications. The m

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Kernel Guardian wrote: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651075 (When I read this I had > the impression that someone is trying to insult my intelligence.) Not fixed and a lot of discussion why it isn't good. > https://live.gnome.org/GnomeOS/De

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:07:10PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 08/22/2012 02:38 PM, Kernel Guardian wrote: > >As I found in Gnome 3.4 release notes, this is default options for all > >applications. > > Are you serious about this? Who in their right mind thought that > the average user wanted this

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

First of all: I have no intention to initiate a new discussion on the usefulness of the GNOME 3 desktop environment. I just want to find a solution for my problem. In fact, I have a huge problem with OpenGL applications. The main window is always maximized at startup, although OpenGL context using

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 08/22/2012 02:38 PM, Kernel Guardian wrote: > >> As I found in Gnome 3.4 release notes, this is default options for all >> applications. >> > > Are you serious about this? Who in their right mind thought that the > average user wanted this?

Re: GNOME 3 Apps maximized on startup?

On 08/22/2012 02:38 PM, Kernel Guardian wrote: As I found in Gnome 3.4 release notes, this is default options for all applications. Are you serious about this? Who in their right mind thought that the average user wanted this? Of course, considering that this is Gnome 3 we're discussing, th

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 2012-08-03 01:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:15:59 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: On 2012-08-02 22:12, Germán A. Racca wrote: > On 08/02/2012 04:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have 3 machines: >> 1) Fedora 16 i686 >> 2) Fedora 16 x86_64 >> 3) Fedora 17 x86_64

Re: gnome 3 extensions

Patrick Dupre writes: Thus, I do not know how to debug the issues. Would you help? You will probably find that it will be much less work to simply run "yum groupinstall xfce", and end up with a useful desktop. pgpsB1orJVrkd.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@list

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 08/02/2012 05:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: On 2012-08-02 22:12, Germán A. Racca wrote: On 08/02/2012 04:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I have 3 machines: 1) Fedora 16 i686 2) Fedora 16 x86_64 3) Fedora 17 x86_64 All forced fallback mode ON Do you mean that you aren't using gnome-shell

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:15:59 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > On 2012-08-02 22:12, Germán A. Racca wrote: > > On 08/02/2012 04:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have 3 machines: > >> 1) Fedora 16 i686 > >> 2) Fedora 16 x86_64 > >> 3) Fedora 17 x86_64 > >> All forced fallback mode ON

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 08/02/2012 01:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I had to face too many issues with the graphic modes in the past (even recently). That way, I am at least certain to start a text session properly. I do not think that it has something to do with the issue. Probably not, but it's best to be sure.

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 2012-08-02 22:23, Joe Zeff wrote: On 08/02/2012 12:48 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: However, I run gnome by loading startx (on all machine) and after I make a Atl F2, if I try to run "r", I get an error message because there are no "r" or "lg" application. Do you have another option to get the gn

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 08/02/2012 12:48 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: However, I run gnome by loading startx (on all machine) and after I make a Atl F2, if I try to run "r", I get an error message because there are no "r" or "lg" application. Do you have another option to get the gnome log file? Why do you use startx i

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 2012-08-02 22:12, Germán A. Racca wrote: On 08/02/2012 04:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I have 3 machines: 1) Fedora 16 i686 2) Fedora 16 x86_64 3) Fedora 17 x86_64 All forced fallback mode ON Do you mean that you aren't using gnome-shell but classical fallback mode? If the answer is

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 2012-08-02 22:00, Jack Craig wrote: sounds like your desktop isnt working properly. when i do alt-f2, i get a small box mid-screen where the cmd is input. if your access to gnome shell doesnt work, id not expect the rest of gnome extensions to work either. OK, I can run "R", but not, lg or

Re: gnome 3 extensions

On 08/02/2012 04:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I have 3 machines: 1) Fedora 16 i686 2) Fedora 16 x86_64 3) Fedora 17 x86_64 All forced fallback mode ON Do you mean that you aren't using gnome-shell but classical fallback mode? If the answer is yes, how can you speak about "extensions"? T

Re: gnome 3 extensions

sounds like your desktop isnt working properly. when i do alt-f2, i get a small box mid-screen where the cmd is input. if your access to gnome shell doesnt work, i'd not expect the rest of gnome extensions to work either. is there a reason for your manual desktop startup? just curious... On Thu,

Re: gnome 3 extensions

Thank for your consideration. However, I run gnome by loading startx (on all machine) and after I make a Atl F2, if I try to run "r", I get an error message because there are no "r" or "lg" application. Do you have another option to get the gnome log file? Thank. i found recent debug info in

Re: gnome 3 extensions

i found recent debug info in gnome debug, try.. ALT-F2 r that will try to restart gnome shell, then ALT-F2 lg will dump the log (error msg) hth, ... On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I have 3 machines: > 1) Fedora 16 i686 > 2) Fedora 16 x86_64 > 3) Fedora 17

Re: gnome 3 extensions install fails silently

On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 20:33 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > >Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > > >>Any clues on how to debug this further? > > > > > >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run pr

Re: gnome 3 extensions install fails silently

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > >>Any clues on how to debug this further? > > > >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the > >"Errors" tab > >for more clues. > > lg, I do n

Re: gnome 3 extensions install fails silently

On 07/21/2012 01:50 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > #yum install lg This is F17 root@f17 ~]# yum info lg Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Error: No matching Packages to list So, may you need to explain more where you got "lg" from and what "lg" is? -- Never

Re: gnome 3 extensions install fails silently

#yum install LG - sorry, Android tablet is not letting me On Jul 20, 2012 1:04 PM, "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > > On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >> Bryn M. Reeves wrote: >>> >>> Any clues on how to debug this further? >> >> >> Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look a

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

Tim wrote: > Having said all that, I much prefer how another OS I used to work, > worked. Writes to drives were completely completed (file written to the > disc, plus the directory data updated) in one go, and you could pull a > disc out moments later. There was no mounting or unmounting. And >

Re: gnome 3 extensions install fails silently

On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Any clues on how to debug this further? Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the "Errors" tab for more clues. lg, I do not have such a command! -- =

Re: gnome 3 extensions install fails silently

Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > Any clues on how to debug this further? Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the "Errors" tab for more clues. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

On 07/20/2012 02:28 AM, Ian Malone wrote: This might be something that needs improved, if you don't notice or your device doesn't have a transfer light (some USB sticks might not and on other devices it's less obvious) then you could end up taking it out while data is still writing. It's not unco

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

On 20 July 2012 13:52, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > On 20.07.2012 11:28, Ian Malone wrote: >> On 20 July 2012 08:45, Shibi wrote: >>> File has been transferred to the disc caching, but the cache hasn't transferred to the media? >>> the copy dialog is destroyed as soon as transfer

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

On 20.07.2012 11:28, Ian Malone wrote: > On 20 July 2012 08:45, Shibi wrote: >> >>> File has been transferred to the disc caching, but the cache hasn't >>> transferred to the media? >>> >> the copy dialog is destroyed as soon as transfer to cache is being >> completed, but file transfer from cache

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

Shibi: >> the copy dialog is destroyed as soon as transfer to cache is being >> completed, but file transfer from cache to media is still going on while >> there is no indication of it on screen. Ian Malone: > This might be something that needs improved, if you don't notice or > your device doesn

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

On 20 July 2012 08:45, Shibi wrote: > > >> File has been transferred to the disc caching, but the cache hasn't >> transferred to the media? >> > the copy dialog is destroyed as soon as transfer to cache is being > completed, but file transfer from cache to media is still going on while > there is

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

File has been transferred to the disc caching, but the cache hasn't > transferred to the media? > > the copy dialog is destroyed as soon as transfer to cache is being completed, but file transfer from cache to media is still going on while there is no indication of it on screen. -- Shahab Shahs

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tim wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:01 -0430, Dokuro wrote: >> I made a similar observation, where the file being copied was not over >> but the progress bar disappeared, you could still notice activity on >> the USB drive and if unmounted a dialog would show up,

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:01 -0430, Dokuro wrote: > I made a similar observation, where the file being copied was not over > but the progress bar disappeared, you could still notice activity on > the USB drive and if unmounted a dialog would show up, with no > progress bar, that there where still jo

Re: Gnome 3 Copy Progress Bar

I made a similar observation, where the file being copied was not over but the progress bar disappeared, you could still notice activity on the USB drive and if unmounted a dialog would show up, with no progress bar, that there where still jobs pending on the drive, this does not feel intuitive at

Re: Gnome 3 session seems to swamp Xorg since update

Am 25.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Hugh Caley: > Received an update to the kmod-nvidia driver this morning. Since then every > time I run a Gnome 3 session the X > server gets very slow until it stops responding altogether. Xfce doesn't seem > to have this problem. > > I'm not sure what to do about

Re: GNOME 3 - Gconf Error

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:00:18 +0530 > Manish Kathuria wrote: > >> I am using the latest version of gnome shell (3.2.1-2) on Fedora 16 >> and many times a window appears with an error message saying  "GConf >> error: Configuration server couldn't b

Re: GNOME 3 - Gconf Error

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:00:18 +0530 Manish Kathuria wrote: > I am using the latest version of gnome shell (3.2.1-2) on Fedora 16 > and many times a window appears with an error message saying "GConf > error: Configuration server couldn't be contacted: D-BUS error: The > GConf daemon is currently

Re: GNOME 3 - Gconf Error

On Tuesday 10 January 2012 12:00 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote: GConf error: Configuration server couldn't be contacted: D-BUS error: The GConf daemon is currently shutting down. Have a look at this[1] [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758129 Warm Regards Have a good day

Re: GNOME 3 Classic on the way

On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:52:04 +0100, OV (Olav) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > I switched to Gnome3 just recently, and frankly, I am not sure I would want > > to go back again. Yes, the project has to mature, and I expect we will hit > > F18 befor

Re: GNOME 3 Classic on the way

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 6:59 AM, JB wrote: > Christopher Svanefalk gmail.com> writes: > >> >> >> I switched to Gnome3 just recently, and frankly, I am not sure I would want >> to > go back again. Yes, the project has to mature, and I expect we will hit F18 > before Gnome3 is on par with Gnome2 i

Re: GNOME 3 Classic on the way

On 12/22/2011 01:09:40 PM, JB wrote: > Cinnamon: GNOME Shell Fork With A GNOME2-Like Layout > http://www.webupd8.org/2011/12/cinnamon-gnome-shell-fork-with- > gnome2.html Having switched to xfce4 when I discovered what a hash the Gnome developers had made of the UI, why should I go back? Sure, th

Re: GNOME 3 Classic on the way

Christopher Svanefalk gmail.com> writes: > > > I switched to Gnome3 just recently, and frankly, I am not sure I would want to go back again. Yes, the project has to mature, and I expect we will hit F18 before Gnome3 is on par with Gnome2 in terms of raw stability (I sometimes cannot even log ou

Re: GNOME 3 Classic on the way

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > I switched to Gnome3 just recently, and frankly, I am not sure I would want > to go back again. Yes, the project has to mature, and I expect we will hit > F18 before Gnome3 is on par with Gnome2 in terms of raw stability (I >

Re: GNOME 3 Classic on the way

I switched to Gnome3 just recently, and frankly, I am not sure I would want to go back again. Yes, the project has to mature, and I expect we will hit F18 before Gnome3 is on par with Gnome2 in terms of raw stability (I sometimes cannot even log out without getting a freeze), but I absolutely belie

Re: gnome 3

On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:31:17 -0500 Chad Kellerman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 15:18:59 +, > > Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > > > one runnin

Re: gnome 3

Patrick Dupre napsal(a): > Hello, > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? > > Thank. Nice solution had when Gnome

Re: gnome 3

On 12/08/2011 06:09 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > That's only delaying the inevitable. The fall back will go away once the > LLVMpipe driver goes in to Fedora 17 or 18. According to Vincent Untz the fall-back mode will be there during the whole Gnome3 life

Re: gnome 3

On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 15:18 +, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? > > Than

Re: gnome 3

On 12/08/2011 04:18 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? You could get a Gnome2-like version by doing this in Gnome3 shell: - click on your name in the top r

Re: gnome 3

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 15:18:59 +, > Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > > the previous

Re: gnome 3

On Thursday 08 December 2011 15:18:59 Patrick Dupre wrote: > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? No, there isn't. W

Re: gnome 3

On 12/08/2011 09:18 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? > > Thank. > > >

Re: gnome 3

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:09:59 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > You can force fallback mode which will work pretty similar to how things > > worked in gnome 2. > > That's only delaying the inevitable. The fall back will go away once the > LLVMpipe driver goes in

Re: gnome 3

Bruno Wolff III wrote: > You can force fallback mode which will work pretty similar to how things > worked in gnome 2. That's only delaying the inevitable. The fall back will go away once the LLVMpipe driver goes in to Fedora 17 or 18. Either learn how to use Gnome Shell or switch DEs. -- users

Re: gnome 3

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 15:18:59 +, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? Y

Re: gnome 3

On 08/12/11 15:18, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > As many user probably, I prefer the version of gnome 2.x (like the > one running with fedora 14) to gnome 3. Is there any option to keep > the previous version of gnome runing with the more recent versions of > fedora? No, is the default answer

Re: Gnome 3 screensaver

On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 14:01 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Anyone tell me what to install to get screensaver setup in gnome3? > > Specifically to use slide show and my own picture folder? > > GNOME 3 no longer includes built-in screens

Re: Gnome 3 screensaver

On 12/03/2011 01:01 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > GNOME 3 no longer includes built-in screensaver support, but you can > still use the legendary xscreensaver software to get a slide show > screensaver. > Oh, good. I never liked the gnome screensaver and always used xscreensaver. One of the th

Re: Gnome 3 screensaver

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > Anyone tell me what to install to get screensaver setup in gnome3? > Specifically to use slide show and my own picture folder? GNOME 3 no longer includes built-in screensaver support, but you can still use the legendary xscreensaver software

Re: Gnome 3 -- liking it more each day !?

On 08/30/2011 04:49 PM, William Case wrote: > After using Gnome 3 for about 3 weeks I really, really, want a toolbox > or several of them. A toolbox is combination of the current Desktop > file, a file, a favourites bar and a docker. Here is how I see a toolbox > working. You think about somethi

Re: Gnome 3: change wallpaper via commandline

Jatin, ..snip.. > > Cool script though. I'll spend some time on this today and let you > know the new command-line. I eventually ditched dconf too. "dconf write" kept saying that the value needed to be in GVariant format. I did have a "file://" URI specifier at the start. Anyway, I couldn't easil

Re: Gnome 3: change wallpaper via commandline

..snip.. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Jatin K wrote: > On Monday 08 August 2011 09:47 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote: >> I have a pictures directory and a cron script that changes my >> wallpaper every hour. For this, I need a way to change the wallpaper >> via commandline. >> >> > try this[1] script >

Re: Gnome 3: change wallpaper via commandline

On Monday 08 August 2011 09:47 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote: > I have a pictures directory and a cron script that changes my > wallpaper every hour. For this, I need a way to change the wallpaper > via commandline. > > try this[1] script http://pastebin.mozilla.org/1293995 make it executable and run

Re: Gnome 3: change wallpaper via commandline

Jitesh Shah wrote: > What is the "latest and the greatest" way to change the wallpaper via > commandline? Did the gconf property migrate to some other directory? Gnome 3 uses GTK3, which uses GSettings instead of GConf for storage. You want "dconf" instead of "gconf" for the command-line tool. --

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 7/17/11 2:49 AM, Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 11:23 +, JB wrote: >> Many "what about" questions that would have to be asked ! > Like how do you keep on working when the cloud has evaporated? (Your > host goes out of business, or screws up their computers, or gets hacked, > or...) > Mo

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 11:23 +, JB wrote: > Many "what about" questions that would have to be asked ! Like how do you keep on working when the cloud has evaporated? (Your host goes out of business, or screws up their computers, or gets hacked, or...) -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

> You mean something like the Sixth Sense technology? And there I thought I was thought of as living in LaLaLand and imagining impossible things, and the destruction of western society. Turns out, someone's already built it. :D Whenever trying to set up a computer (device), I'm convinced that

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 7/16/11 1:25 PM, JB wrote: > Roelof 'Ben' Kusters bentrein.com> writes: > >> Change is gonna happen. And it's gonna destroy the status quo. >> If you ask me, it's very urgent that that happens, because - next to a >> whole new - perhaps Matrix like - approach to social interaction, it will >>

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 7/15/11 4:55 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote: > I for myself have been a big Gnome fan over a lot of years, and have > been using it both at home and at work. I also have been a big LXDE > and xmonad fan, which runs on all of my laptops. Not a big thing for > me, I'll drop F15, and when F16 comes out,

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 7/15/11 6:31 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 14:18 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > >>> I agree with you that Gnome2 is dead but someone has to explain why >> a >>> feature like holding the ALT key is necessary to power off in the >> User >>> Menu. It seems to me there was room

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

Roelof 'Ben' Kusters bentrein.com> writes: > > Change is gonna happen. And it's gonna destroy the status quo. > If you ask me, it's very urgent that that happens, because - next to a > whole new - perhaps Matrix like - approach to social interaction, it will > make room for other technolog

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Saturday 16 July 2011 09:34:59 Roelof 'Ben' Kusters wrote: > What we now know as desktops will in > the not so very distant future be used only for servers and other large > storage devices. Computing will be entirely mobile, and envision a little > device on your collar (possibly in combination

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

While agreeing with your rant in many ways, I would like to strike a slightly different note; it is the destruction of the status quo of western society. Absolutely. But that is nothing but change. Change always hurts - sometimes many, sometimes a few. But change is also always necessary; w

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

Roelof 'Ben' Kusters bentrein.com> writes: > ... > > One thing is sure: Your new user-base will not be your current (old) > > user-base. > ... > I adore Gnome3. It is where > computing is going, like it or not. What we now know as desktops will in > the not so very distant future be used only

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

Hi There, This discussion will be an endless one - as there will always be people who don't like it; and people who do. Change always hurts, because you need to learn computing anew. And it's difficult for many to be humble enough to say you don't know how to do it - if you already know how to do

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 07/13/2011 10:32 AM, Tim wrote: > Hmmph... Then goes ahead and does something that's likely to do so. > Statements, like that, are similar to: With all due respect... > And: I don't mean to be critical, but... That's not how I read it. It looked to me as though the OP was asking us our opi

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 07/13/2011 07:39 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > Is he right and we're moving badly in the wrong direction (as in, an > interface with a more traditional GUI feel would be a big winner?) or is > competing with a similar look-and-feel as the default while providing > lots of traditional-feeling alternatives a

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8? => choosing the fedora desktop

Genes MailLists wrote: > So - lets choose the default desktop manager for fedora from among: > >Gnome 3 >KDE >XFCE >LXDE >? Other? > ...so, if we actually get a vote that counts, I'd say XFCE. Of course, this is *my* personal opinion. There were technical choices the Gnom

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 14:18 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > > I agree with you that Gnome2 is dead but someone has to explain why > a > > feature like holding the ALT key is necessary to power off in the > User > > Menu. It seems to me there was room in the original list for a Power > off > > opti

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:18:40 +0930 Tim wrote: > Over time, *what* did the automounting has changed. Somewhere along the > way HAL did it, and some of those other desktops didn't appear to make > use of it. And now HAL is a dinosaur and if you try to ask about using it, people look at you like yo

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 15.07.2011, James McKenzie wrote: > If you even THINK that the current breed of developers CARE about what > the user base wants/needs, you are living in dream-land. As you mentioned before, all is about choices. If there's no interest in what the user base needs, well, the user base will m

  1   2   >