Re: FedUp: best plan?

On 01/17/2013 01:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:41:41AM +, Phil Dobbin wrote: >> Hi, all. >> >> I've been watching the developments regarding everybody trying to >> upgrade via FedUp & can anyone advise me whether issuing: >> >> 'sudo fedup-cli —network 18 —debuglog fedu

fedup with VBox VM - Notes

For those who may be doing the same.. I had a fully updated F17-32 system with GNOME, KDE, LXDE, OpenBox, and Xfce installed. It was running just fine with gdm running as the window manager. I also had the Vbox Guest Additions installed. To get a running F18 system I did the following...

wireless network fails f18

After being up for about 15 minutes, the wireless network disappears. I have to reboot to restore functionality. Ralink corp. RT3090 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe F18, 64 bit This is the log at the time it cr*ps out: Jan 16 23:22:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [ 535.433650] dmar: DRHD: handling fault sta

Re: Fedup for LVM?

On 01/16/2013 05:33 AM, Steve Berg wrote: From what I've read it seems that the anaconda in F18 will not be able to deal with this setup like previous anaconda's. Anaconda doesn't do upgrades anymore. Other than that, if you linked to what you'd read, it would help explain any issues that you

Re: Ralink 3090 not seen after fedup to f18

On 01/16/2013 10:30 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > After updating, I have no Wifi. The controller is an ralink RT3090. It > shows up in lspci, but I can't access it. > Never mind. I power cycled the machine and it showed up. So far, so good. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproj

Ralink 3090 not seen after fedup to f18

After updating, I have no Wifi. The controller is an ralink RT3090. It shows up in lspci, but I can't access it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraprojec

Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 01/16/2013 12:05 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: I remember reading that F18 includes both Gnome 3.x and also Gnome 2.x renamed MATE desktop? More or less. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. Fedora also includes Cinnamon, now, which is an alternate shell based on GNOME 3, but with a more traditional pa

Adwaita GTK3 on F18 no longer honors bgcolor

Under Fedora 17, I was able to select an alternate background color for GTK2 and GTK3. Under F18, only the GTK2 applications honor the setting. Before I file a a bug, does anyone know if this behavior was an expected change? $ dconf dump /org/gnome/desktop/interface/ [/] gtk-color-scheme='se

Re: FedUp: best plan?

On 01/16/2013 06:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: It would be very helpful if you could report those troubles. Otherwise, it's hard to make it better. And, unless people report these things, the devs won't know there's anything wrong. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Re: FedUp: best plan?

On 01/17/2013 10:50 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47:54AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Quick question in respect to this >> Would you expect fedup to work in a Virtual Machine (Vbox) environment? >> I've had 2 failed updates, out of 2, but both were in a Vbox machine and

Re: FedUp: best plan?

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47:54AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Quick question in respect to this > Would you expect fedup to work in a Virtual Machine (Vbox) environment? > I've had 2 failed updates, out of 2, but both were in a Vbox machine and > both had a 3rd party MATE repository enabled. T

Re: FedUp: best plan?

On 01/17/2013 10:42 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:59:35AM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> I would recommend not to use fedup. I'm facing a lot of troubles after >> going the fedup route. Although not officially supported, you could try >> upgrading via yum. It has been relia

Re: [OT] posting and receiving post [*solved*]

On 01/13/2013 10:03 AM, g wrote: > why is it that when posting to this tsl i will sometimes receive my > via my subscription and sometimes i do not? [*solved*] get a hunch. bet a bunch. as it turns out the ???great and wonderful??? yahoo has done it again. for some strange and yet to be know r

Re: FedUp: best plan?

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:59:35AM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote: > I would recommend not to use fedup. I'm facing a lot of troubles after > going the fedup route. Although not officially supported, you could try > upgrading via yum. It has been reliably working for people across > multiple releases.

Re: FedUp: best plan?

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:41:41AM +, Phil Dobbin wrote: > Hi, all. > > I've been watching the developments regarding everybody trying to > upgrade via FedUp & can anyone advise me whether issuing: > > 'sudo fedup-cli —network 18 —debuglog fedupdebug.log' > > is still the recommended way to

Re: f-18 scfolling -

On 01/16/2013 04:43 PM, Brian Mury wrote: But why ask me? I'm not in any way involved with GNOME project. If you don't like it (I don't either), take it up with them. I would, but I bailed on Gnome when I read what Gnome 3 was going to be like. Now, I too use Xfce and am very happy with it T

Re: unable to get Broadcom 4312 loaded F 18

Hi Zoltan, Thanks very much! I am happy to say that I got this resolved by following your detailed instructions! Thanks very much!! I do wonder if the problem with the broadcom-wl version in RPMfusions non-free is that the broadcom-wl is for version 5.100.82 and not 5.100.138. Of course, I don'

Re: f-18 scfolling -

On 16/01/13 19:43, Brian Mury wrote: Hi Joe, It says here, quite clearly, that the OP is using Xfce, not Gnome. Oops, you're right, I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. even if he were, why should he have to change themes to get back functionality that's been standard for over a decad

Re: f-18 scfolling -

Hi Joe, It says here, quite clearly, that the OP is using Xfce, not Gnome. Oops, you're right, I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. even if he were, why should he have to change themes to get back functionality that's been standard for over a decade? Because that's the default theme

FedUp: best plan?

Hi, all. I've been watching the developments regarding everybody trying to upgrade via FedUp & can anyone advise me whether issuing: 'sudo fedup-cli —network 18 —debuglog fedupdebug.log' is still the recommended way to approach the upgrade? I'm running a rock solid Fedora 17 with all updates ap

Re: unable to get Broadcom 4312 loaded F 18

Thanks very much, Zoltan! Does this mean that I should yum erase broadcom-wl and kmod-wl first (these I got from rpmfusion-nonfree)? Thanks again! Ranjan On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:57:03 +0100 Zoltan Hoppar wrote: > Just solved the problem. You should load the b43 driver. > > modprobe b43 > then

Re: f-18 scfolling -

On 01/16/2013 04:01 PM, Brian Mury wrote: Are you using GNOME? The default GNOME theme removed the scroll buttons (they'll be missing in lots of other places too). Changing the theme should bring them back. This change was in Gnome 3.4, so you should have seen it in F17 too. Brian On 16-Jan-1

Re: f-18 scfolling -

Hi Bob, Are you using GNOME? The default GNOME theme removed the scroll buttons (they'll be missing in lots of other places too). Changing the theme should bring them back. This change was in Gnome 3.4, so you should have seen it in F17 too. Brian On 16-Jan-13 12:54, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Vir

Re: unable to get Broadcom 4312 loaded F 18

Hi Ranjan, Forgot to mention - be sure that you have not an subversion of 4312. Use this to see it - > lspci -vnn -d 14e4 More here: http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#Supported_devices Zoltan 2013/1/17 Zoltan Hoppar : > Just solved the problem. You should load the b43 driver. > > mo

Re: unable to get Broadcom 4312 loaded F 18

Just solved the problem. You should load the b43 driver. modprobe b43 then you'll see in dmesg that missing the right firmware. Install some more packages that is not included to F18 by default: rfkill, wget, b43-openfwwf, b43-tools. (Why has been wget excluded from package list, no clue) Ge

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:13:43AM +1100, Roger wrote: > On 01/17/2013 10:05 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > >On 01/16/2013 02:59 PM, Roger issued this missive: > > > >>Death is just the beginning! (Galaxy Quest) > > > >"Death is nature's way of dropping carrier." > > >Spot On! Well said! yup.

Re: F18 wont let me admin users and groups. CIRCUMVENTION

On 16/01/13 17:16, Erik P. Olsen wrote: On 16/01/13 16:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:32:12 +0100 "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: Nothing happens when I select Applications Menu -> Administration -> Users and Groups. And nothing seems to be logged. I've even logged in as root to no avai

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 01/17/2013 10:05 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/16/2013 02:59 PM, Roger issued this missive: Death is just the beginning! (Galaxy Quest) "Death is nature's way of dropping carrier." Spot On! Well said! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscri

Re: Fedora 18

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:49:13AM +1100, Roger wrote: > >>Sudo refused to let me use user with root permissions even after > >>editing sudoers. More tinkering unless I'm doing the wrong thing with > >>sudoers. > >Since you haven't said what you actually did, nobody can give you > >accurate advise.

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 01/16/2013 02:59 PM, Roger issued this missive: Death is just the beginning! (Galaxy Quest) "Death is nature's way of dropping carrier." -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype:

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 01/16/2013 10:29 PM, Ian Malone wrote: On 16 January 2013 11:20, Frank Murphy wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:17:49 +0100 Roberto Ragusa wrote: I can assure you that death *is* a big change. ;-) You have experienced it? Personally, cannot say if it's a change, only that it's guaranteed.

Re: Fedora 18

Sudo refused to let me use user with root permissions even after editing sudoers. More tinkering unless I'm doing the wrong thing with sudoers. Since you haven't said what you actually did, nobody can give you accurate advise. All I could say was make sure you edit sudoers properly, such as us

Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 08:16 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote: > On 01/15/2013 06:55 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Looking at the Fedora 18 from a Live Cd I found that Gnome is following > > the tradition of not following its tradition. > > Clicking on Activities no longer gives you Applications item at the

unable to get Broadcom 4312 loaded F 18

Hi, I have tried to get wifi going on a Dell Latitude E5400 with the Broadcom 4312 chipset. I did the following: Installed broadcom-wl from rpmfusion non-free. (This installed broadcom-wl and the dependency kmod-wl.) Rebooted, but "nothing" happened. So, following this page http://forums.fedor

f-18 scfolling -

Something has happened to the ability to scroll smoothly in Thunderbird since upgrading two computers to F-18/64/XFCE. In the past there has been a spot at the top and bottom of the scroll bar where you could increment the scroll gradually. That is no longer there in Thunderbird o

Re: Howto fedup?

On 16/01/13 14:22, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:09 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: "yum update grub" effected no change apparent to me although it did update. Grub2 is recommended for F18, though not strictly required. Apparently you need to do mo

Re: Restarting fedup

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 07:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:09:04 -0430 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > So I decided to try fedup using the network install option. Spent > > most of the day downloading over 2700 packages (I have a whole > > 1Mbps link, woohoo), rebooted, se

Re: Howto fedup?

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:09 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 16/01/13 12:07, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > That's basically just telling you the kernel version, which may not have > > been updated due to the problems you've been having. Try looking > > at /etc/fedora-release th

Re: Howto fedup?

On 16/01/13 12:07, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: That's basically just telling you the kernel version, which may not have been updated due to the problems you've been having. Try looking at /etc/fedora-release though it's not a reliable indicator e.g. mine now says "Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow)

Re: Replacing a messd up 18 with live install...fail

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:00 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/16/2013 08:42 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: > >Now, been there..done that. I reinstalled most of the groups I had > > including the basic x system. No joy. It now appears the mesa drivers in > > 18 will not run on my (ancient - Intel 865B

Re: Replacing a messd up 18 with live install...fail

On 01/16/2013 08:42 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: Now, been there..done that. I reinstalled most of the groups I had including the basic x system. No joy. It now appears the mesa drivers in 18 will not run on my (ancient - Intel 865B MB) machine. There have been a bug or two reported but it seem

Re: o/p from fedup --network 18 --debuglog fedupdebug.log

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:12 -0500, JOYCE POLZIN wrote: > 65.546] (II) fedup:message() installing package nss-mdns-0.10-11.fc18.i686 > needs 2047MB on the / filesystem > [ 65.546] (DD) fedup:() Exception: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/bin/fedup", line 330, in > main(args) > Fi

Re: chrome on f18 (fix)

I used rpm rather than yum, downloaded the rpm directly to the machine and installed it. - Original Message - Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 16.01.2013 18:03, schrieb Neal Becker: >> Mike Wohlgemuth wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:11 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: Well, wor

Re: chrome on f18 (fix)

Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 16.01.2013 18:03, schrieb Neal Becker: >> Mike Wohlgemuth wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:11 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: Well, workaround really. /usr/lib64/libudev.so.0 -> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 >>> >>> A better solution is probably: >>>

o/p from fedup --network 18 --debuglog fedupdebug.log

65.546] (II) fedup:message() installing package nss-mdns-0.10-11.fc18.i686 needs 2047MB on the / filesystem [ 65.546] (DD) fedup:() Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/bin/fedup", line 330, in main(args) File "/bin/fedup", line 277, in main transaction_test(pkgs) File "/b

Re: F18: Nautilus window cannot be re-sized

antonio ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 16/01/2013 18:38: antonio ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 16/01/2013 18:10: When I start Nautilus on my updated F18, it starts with maximized window, I cannot re-size it as I am missing the options on the left of the top bar

Re: chrome on f18 (fix)

Am 16.01.2013 18:03, schrieb Neal Becker: > Mike Wohlgemuth wrote: > >> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:11 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >>> Well, workaround really. >>> >>> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.0 -> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 >>> >> >> A better solution is probably: >> >> yum remove google-chrome-stable >>

F18: Nautilus : cannot find the property panel with folders listed first

In previous releases in Nautilus there was a panel called property where I had the setting to have folders listed first: where is this option now??? -- Antonio M Skype: amontag52 Linux Fedora F18(Spherical Cow) on Acer 5720 http://lugsaronno.altervista.org http://www.campingmonterosa.com --

Re: [389-users] netscaperoot deleted

On 01/16/2013 09:55 AM, Elizabeth Jones wrote: You might try running setup-ds-admin.pl -u on all of your machines. thanks. I ran this and it looks like it ran successfully, but still no netscaperoot on my second server. I went back and looked at the first server, and it looks like he may have s

Re: F18: Nautilus window cannot be re-sized

antonio ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 16/01/2013 18:10: When I start Nautilus on my updated F18, it starts with maximized window, I cannot re-size it as I am missing the options on the left of the top bar (I suspect that actually I am missing one top bar of Nautilus).The only ba

F18 and 'old' VirtualBox (finally...success!)

Congratulations to F18. I have tested (or attempted to test via virtual systems) all the Fedora versions between what I still use on a day-to-day basis (F8) till today. Since I'm still using (stuck on) F8, I was restricted to using only the compatible versions of VirtualBox. From F12 through F17

Re: firewall-applet

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:47:00PM +, Jorge Martínez López wrote: > I have tested firewall-applet in the desktop. I used it to open a port in > the home zone. Then I added my network interfaces to the home zone in > NetworkManager but it didn't work so I used the command line. Can you file a b

F18: Nautilus window cannot be re-sized

When I start Nautilus on my updated F18, it starts with maximized window, I cannot re-size it as I am missing the options on the left of the top bar (I suspect that actually I am missing one top bar of Nautilus).The only bar that I get includes arrows on the left, lens and other options on the

Re: Howto fedup?

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:49 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > What now, I still see: > [bobg@Box7 ~]$ uname -a > Linux Box7 3.6.11-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 17 22:16:35 UTC > 2012 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux That's basically just telling you the kernel versi

Re: chrome on f18 (fix)

Mike Wohlgemuth wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:11 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> Well, workaround really. >> >> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.0 -> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 >> > > A better solution is probably: > > yum remove google-chrome-stable > yum install google-chrome-stable > > Woogie > Reall

Re: [OT] Folders under INBOX (re: g)

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:47 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: > So just to clarify for someone like me.who has a three sub-folders > under my GMail account running on TB. You're saying I should move > those folders to the "Local Folder" on my computer and away from under > the Inbox for GMail

Re: F18 rpmfusion x86_64 key missing?

On 01/15/2013 01:59 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote: From the rpm -ql output shown below, I suspect it's a file missing from rpmfusion-free-release-16-3.noarch Note that earlier releases have both -NN-primary and -NN-x86_64 files, but there's only -18-primary for Fedora 18. I manually installed t

Re: [389-users] netscaperoot deleted

> > You might try running setup-ds-admin.pl -u on all of your machines. thanks. I ran this and it looks like it ran successfully, but still no netscaperoot on my second server. I went back and looked at the first server, and it looks like he may have somehow embedded server 2 into netscaperoot o

Re: Howto fedup?

On 16/01/13 11:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:10 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 15/01/13 16:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I think you need an actual install ISO, not a Live one. AFAIK the Live ISOs are comparatively limited and not meant to be used

Re: Howto fedup?

On 16/01/13 11:10, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 15/01/13 16:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I think you need an actual install ISO, not a Live one. AFAIK the Live ISOs are comparatively limited and not meant to be used for upgrading. poc Yes, it says it wont work with the li

Re: [OT] Folders under INBOX (re: g)

On 01/14/2013 11:47 PM, staticsafe wrote: On 1/14/2013 23:02, g wrote: On 01/15/2013 02:09 AM, staticsafe wrote: "also, good luck with subfolders under inbox." What exactly is the problem? there is a known quirk with mozilla's thunderbird email client involving an email account's Inbox that h

Re: Replacing a messd up 18 with live install...fail

On 15/01/13 09:38 PM, Fedora User wrote: On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 20:43 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: I already have an 18 installation which is somewhat messed up because at one point I had rawhide repos in my list. Repairs have been unsucessful. I am assuming that you have a broken 18 install

Fedora 18 not mounting USB drives.

Good day, When I boot and login I get a udisks have a problem. Kindly please : how to fix this. JohanS -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wi

F18: Can't recovery from suspend

If I suspend my laptop, I can't back from it, I get a loop with a screen going from a date to blank. Is it a general bug?? -- Antonio M Skype: amontag52 Linux Fedora F18(Spherical Cow) on Acer 5720 http://lugsaronno.altervista.org http://www.campingmonterosa.com -- users mailing list users@

Fedora 18 vs eMachines 525 notebook

Hi, I was trying to install F18/x86_64 on the notebook in $SUBJECT but I could only use the "traditional" (VESA) mode. Although KMS produced a good native picture but it was so dim that the picture was barely visible. The Fn + Up/Down buttons that should change the brightness did nothing. [root@

Re: [389-users] netscaperoot deleted

On 01/16/2013 09:16 AM, Elizabeth Jones wrote: We have a cluster of 4 directory servers that we are trying to put into production. One of our admins was doing some experimenting on one of them and it looks like he deleted netscaperoot. What is weird though is that we can still start and access th

Re: Howto fedup?

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:10 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 15/01/13 16:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I think you need an actual install ISO, not a Live one. AFAIK the Live > > ISOs are comparatively limited and not meant to be used for upgrading. > > poc > > Yes,

Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 01/15/2013 06:55 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Looking at the Fedora 18 from a Live Cd I found that Gnome is following > the tradition of not following its tradition. > Clicking on Activities no longer gives you Applications item at the top. > Together with the standard applications on the left sid

[389-users] netscaperoot deleted

We have a cluster of 4 directory servers that we are trying to put into production. One of our admins was doing some experimenting on one of them and it looks like he deleted netscaperoot. What is weird though is that we can still start and access the admin server (after multiple reboots and other

Re: F18 wont let me admin users and groups.

On 16/01/13 16:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:32:12 +0100 "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: Nothing happens when I select Applications Menu -> Administration -> Users and Groups. And nothing seems to be logged. I've even logged in as root to no avail. Any suggestions? Are in you Xfce?

Re: Howto fedup?

On 15/01/13 16:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I think you need an actual install ISO, not a Live one. AFAIK the Live ISOs are comparatively limited and not meant to be used for upgrading. poc Yes, it says it wont work with the live spins, I missed that first time around. All went pretty

Re: F18 wont let me admin users and groups.

On 16/01/13 16:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:32:12 +0100 "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: Nothing happens when I select Applications Menu -> Administration -> Users and Groups. And nothing seems to be logged. I've even logged in as root to no avail. Any suggestions? Are in you Xfce?

Re: firewall-applet

Hi! I have tested firewall-applet in the desktop. I used it to open a port in the home zone. Then I added my network interfaces to the home zone in NetworkManager but it didn't work so I used the command line. Since then firewalld is running happily and I haven't used the firewall applet any more

Re: F18 wont let me admin users and groups.

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:32:12 +0100 "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: > Nothing happens when I select Applications Menu -> Administration -> > Users and Groups. And nothing seems to be logged. I've even logged in > as root to no avail. > > Any suggestions? Are in you Xfce? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Re: Cooperative Bug Isolation for Fedora 18

On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 20:32 -0600, Ben Liblit wrote: > The Cooperative Bug Isolation Project (CBI) is now available for Fedora > 18. We currently offer instrumented versions of Evolution, The GIMP, > GNOME Panel, Gnumeric, Liferea, Nautilus, Pidgin, and Rhythmbox. > Download at

Re: chrome on f18 (fix)

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:11 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Well, workaround really. > > /usr/lib64/libudev.so.0 -> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 > A better solution is probably: yum remove google-chrome-stable yum install google-chrome-stable Woogie -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org

F18 wont let me admin users and groups.

Nothing happens when I select Applications Menu -> Administration -> Users and Groups. And nothing seems to be logged. I've even logged in as root to no avail. Any suggestions? -- Erik Concordia parvæ res crescunt discordia maximæ dilabuntur -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

f18 update woes

Dear Fedora-enthusiasts, I have just run fedup on a couple of F17 systems with sad consequences, and I am looking for help. 1) The first was an F17 along machine. I did a network 'fedup' which ran with no errors and left it for the night. In the morning it was stick in a boot sequence. I

F18 live fails to recognise network

Hello, I was about to fresh install F18 and the integrated network card that F17 recognised is not on F18, it is a working asrock 945gcm-s. Does this mean that I should reinstall F17 and fedup or is there a simpler (faster) method? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

chrome on f18 (fix)

Well, workaround really. /usr/lib64/libudev.so.0 -> /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: hostname where?

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 09:33 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > OK, I just installed f18 in a virtual machine, and hostname reports > localhost.localdomain. > > I tried adding HOSTNAME= to /etc/sysconfig/network where it always > used to be, but it had no effect. > > I ran the system-setting app and can'

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 18.

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 08:51 +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > This marks 10 releases since I first started using Fedora. It has been > a fantastic ride so far. Thanks to the community and the devs for all > your hard work in creating and evolving this amazing OS :) I echo your sentiments, but

Re: Restarting fedup

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 07:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:09:04 -0430 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > So I decided to try fedup using the network install option. Spent > > most of the day downloading over 2700 packages (I have a whole > > 1Mbps link, woohoo), rebooted, se

Re: hostname where?

On 01/16/2013 10:33 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > OK, I just installed f18 in a virtual machine, and hostname reports > localhost.localdomain. > > I tried adding HOSTNAME= to /etc/sysconfig/network where it always > used to be, but it had no effect. > > I ran the system-setting app and can't find anythi

Re: Yum update after f17 -> f18 fedup via iso

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 06:43 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:19:39 -0430 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Was my meaning too hard to understand? The previous poster is > > replying to my comment about using fedup followed by yum update. > > It's entirely logical to ask what h

Re: Fedora 18

Allegedly, on or about 16 January 2013, Roger sent: > Sudo refused to let me use user with root permissions even after > editing sudoers. More tinkering unless I'm doing the wrong thing with > sudoers. Since you haven't said what you actually did, nobody can give you accurate advise. All I could

hostname where?

OK, I just installed f18 in a virtual machine, and hostname reports localhost.localdomain. I tried adding HOSTNAME= to /etc/sysconfig/network where it always used to be, but it had no effect. I ran the system-setting app and can't find anything that hints to me that it might have something to do

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

Allegedly, on or about 16 January 2013, Ian Malone sent: > Well everyone who's tried it stops talking to their old friends at > least. Dunno about that. I think those that have "tried" it do talk to their old friends, quite a bit about it. Only those that successful don't. -- [tim@localhost ~]

Fedup for LVM?

Got a couple of F17 systems that I'm a little wary of re-installing with F18.  Both are setup with two drives, GPT partitioned and running RAID1 with a couple of LVM volume groups.  From what I've read it seems that the anaconda in F18 will not be able to deal with this setup like previous anaconda

F18: minor issues after fedup at boot time

I upgraded my F17 to F18 through Fedup. I run all available updates. I didn't carry out the grub2 update as I was already in grub2 and my machine is not UEFI. Now at start-up I don't get the splash screen and the login window is green instead of blue. Running a notebook with intel grapphic and i915

fedora 17 no wireless

First time to try to use wireless since installing F17. Connects, but doesn't succeed at authorizing. Keeps trying to authorize for several minutes, then gives up. /var/log/messages shows stuff like NetworkManager[483]: (wlan0): device state change: disconnected -> prepare (reason 'none') [30 40

Re: Which Fedup?

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:44:29AM -0500, John Aldrich wrote: > I was looking to download Fedup, but I see that there is one for F17 and one > for F18. I am currently running F17, so I'm guessing I should download that > one I used the one for F17 and worked fine. -- Regards, Olav -- use

Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > I can assure you that death *is* a big change. ;-) One thread that develops with a positive tone, and ends philosophical about it all even the Fedora list can change! and for the better!. I think I´ve seen it all. *joke* *joke* FC --

Re: Which Fedup?

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:44:29 -0500 John Aldrich wrote: > I was looking to download Fedup, but I see that there is one for > F17 and one for F18. I am currently running F17, so I'm guessing I > should download that one correct -- Regards, Frank "Byte my kernel"

Which Fedup?

I was looking to download Fedup, but I see that there is one for F17 and one for F18. I am currently running F17, so I'm guessing I should download that one -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:29:36 + Ian Malone wrote: > Well everyone who's tried it stops talking to their old friends at > least. > and that applies to old friends who are also dead? :D -- Regards, Frank "Byte my kernel" --me . -- users mail

Re: OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 16 January 2013 11:20, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:17:49 +0100 > Roberto Ragusa wrote: > >> I can assure you that death *is* a big change. ;-) >> > You have experienced it? > Personally, cannot say if it's a change, > only that it's guaranteed. > Well everyone who's tried it

OT: Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:17:49 +0100 Roberto Ragusa wrote: > I can assure you that death *is* a big change. ;-) > You have experienced it? Personally, cannot say if it's a change, only that it's guaranteed. -- Regards, Frank "Byte my kernel" --

Re: A Look at Fedora 18

On 01/16/2013 11:51 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:44:48 +1100 > Roger wrote: > >> I installed it I love it! >> The only guarantee in life is "Change" -- > > Life doesn't guarantee change, > it will probably occur, > but only death is guaranteed. I can assure you that death *

Ncat not working after upgrade from F17 -> F18

Hi, Has anyone else noticed ncat is not working after upgrading to F18? I am presuming it is because of some firewall issue, but I don't know how to debug this. This is a typical output: $ nc -vvv www.google.com Ncat: Version 6.01 ( http://nmap.org/ncat ) NSOCK (0.0030s) TCP connection requeste

  1   2   >