Re: Trying to understand input/output error seen while reading newly burned dvd+r

On 07/19/2010 11:20 PM, D Wyatt wrote: > Well, I'm no less confused, but ... > > Despite the fact that the first iso compared w/o error to the > originating directory after being mounted, i went ahead and > recreated the iso and burned another dvd+r from that. > > The new dvd now compares w/ no e

Re: OT: Cloud Computing is coming to ...

On 07/19/2010 11:15 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2010 10:27 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: >>The cloud computing is a topic that I believe should have more input and >> while I am opposed to it, I like for others to take a look at this lively >> topic. > I'm curious, what do you m

Re: Trying to understand input/output error seen while reading newly burned dvd+r

Well, I'm no less confused, but ... Despite the fact that the first iso compared w/o error to the originating directory after being mounted, i went ahead and recreated the iso and burned another dvd+r from that. The new dvd now compares w/ no errors to the original directory. I hate apparent no

Re: OT: Cloud Computing is coming to ...

On Monday 19 July 2010 10:27 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > The cloud computing is a topic that I believe should have more input and > while I am opposed to it, I like for others to take a look at this lively > topic. I'm curious, what do you mean by you are opposed to it? I find it quite prod

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On Monday 19 July 2010 01:46 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > What seemed to work, was (since the source tarball isn't configured for > FEdora as the way they have it setup) to make a link > from /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and that let > the firefox-4 work with plugins. > Tha

Re: OT: Cloud Computing is coming to ...

take a look at this lively > topic. > > See more and other topics of interest at Distrowatch Weekly > > http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100719 > > Regards, > > Antonio > > > What are he implicit and explicit impacts on the Fedora distribution? -- us

[no subject]

-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot

On Tuesday, 20 July, 2010 @01:00 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed: > I couldn't not remove any thing. Grub.conf apparently is a non > editable file we were not advising to edit the grub.conf file. If the kernel arguments from the boot menu are edited, they return to 'normal' at next boot. Another w

OT: Cloud Computing is coming to ...

http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100719 Regards, Antonio -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Can one now help?

Tim: >> I will judge that [1] link, then. I can see quite a few things that >> I wouldn't suggest someone does unless they know why they're doing >> it. 1. http://digitizor.com/2009/01/31/fedora-speed-tweaks-make-fedora-faster/ Parshwa Murdia: > So removing the following line from the sysctl.co

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On 7/19/10, JD wrote: > > I had noscript installed but it broke several websites, including youtube. > Several links in youtube would cease to work. I could no longer play > youtube vids. > Perhaps I misconfigured it??? It's likely you just neglected to trust the relevant websites. For YouTube

Re: system-config-display issue Fedora13 RC3

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 20:37 -0500, David A. Paredes Rios wrote: > Yes, unfortunately im having the same issue, now using the final > version of fedora 13... the error is: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py", line 378, in > > dialog = xCo

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 7/19/2010 9:17 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote: >> On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> >> >> Obviously the previous kernel worked correct? Why not use that one? >> >> >> > I am using the previous kernel. > > I just like to keep up and it is a upd

Re: Firefox Beta

On 07/19/2010 03:38 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > john wendel wrote: >> I installed the latest Firefox Beta on a 32-bit F11 box, and I'm really >> impressed. So, I decided to install it on my 64-bit F13 box. >> >> The problem - the F13 box is 64-bit only and the Firefox beta seems to >> be 32-bit, so

Re: system-config-display issue Fedora13 RC3

Yes, unfortunately im having the same issue, now using the final version of fedora 13... the error is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py", line 378, in dialog = xConfigDialog.XConfigDialog(hardware_state, xconfig, videocard.VideoCardInfo())

Re: How's gnash for flash comin' ?

On 07/20/2010 06:52 AM, William Case wrote: > Hi; > > Does anybody have an idea when we might see an update for gnash. I keep > watching the threads, upgrades etc. to see if one is on the way. I am > trying to avoid going back to adobe flash, but I am losing too many > services because of it and/o

Re: Preupgrade F11 ---> F12 ?

--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Patrick Bartek wrote: > > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Peter Diercks > wrote: > > > >> I am running a server under F11. It is a remote > machine > >> which I have no > >> physical access to. It has a network connection. I > wanted > >> to upgrade to > >> F12

How's gnash for flash comin' ?

Hi; Does anybody have an idea when we might see an update for gnash. I keep watching the threads, upgrades etc. to see if one is on the way. I am trying to avoid going back to adobe flash, but I am losing too many services because of it and/or Mozilla. The latest google (GNU and others) informat

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote: > On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, >>>Michael Miles wrote: >>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to be the wr

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/20/2010 06:29 AM, Tom H wrote: >> >> The official manual is (fairly recent, AFAIK) >> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/ >> (which is the url of the now MIA grub1 manual). >> > > grub1 is called grub legacy now and doc

Re: Grub2 question

On 07/20/2010 06:29 AM, Tom H wrote: > > The official manual is (fairly recent, AFAIK) > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/ > (which is the url of the now MIA grub1 manual). > grub1 is called grub legacy now and doc for that is at http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, >> Michael Miles wrote: >>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. >> >> Fedora doesn't produce the kmod.

Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot

> From: "Darr" > Subject: Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot > On Sunday, 18 July, 2010 @14:24 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed: > > > By runing depmod -a I got the following: > > WARNING: Couldn't open directory /lib/modules/2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686: > > no such file or directory. > > FATAL: c

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:12 +0100 > Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> What is the supposed advantage of grub2 over grub? > > As near as I can tell grub2 is a classic example of > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect > > It is supposed to

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Tom H wrote: >> >> To be fair, the difference between grub1/2 and lilo remains that >> grub1/2 don't update the mbr for every config change but only when >> they are set up. >> >> grub2's update is the equivalent of grubby on Fedora and grub

RE: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot

> From: Harald Hoyer > Subject: Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot > On 07/18/2010 04:24 PM, Vincent Onelli wrote: > >> From: "Darr" > >> On Saturday, 17 July, 2010 @23:56 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed: > >> > >>> I used the rescue disk typed: chroot /mnt/sysimage > >>> then dracut -f /bo

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/20/2010 06:09 AM, Michael Miles wrote: > Oh well, considering the two main Video companies is Nvidia and Ati it > would be good to have a Fedora based driver that works 100%. > I am not knocking Nouveau but it still has a way to go before it can be > called a driver replacement. > > Thanks

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/19/2010 05:27 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/20/2010 05:53 AM, Michael Miles wrote: > >> I am finding it hard to deal with as RPMFusion and Fedora are two >> seperate thing but when it blocks a update then yes I do think it is a >> Fedora issue. >> >> > Among the mainstream

Trying to understand input/output error seen while reading newly burned dvd+r

Hi, I'm running 32-bit Fedora 12 on a recently built core2 duo system. The dvd burner is a month-old Samsung drive. I use imgburn 2.5.0.0 under Wine to create iso's and burn them to disk. ( Imgburn works better than K3B; e.g. if iso is near the disk capacity, K3B says it won't fit. Also,

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/20/2010 05:53 AM, Michael Miles wrote: > I am finding it hard to deal with as RPMFusion and Fedora are two > seperate thing but when it blocks a update then yes I do think it is a > Fedora issue. > Among the mainstream distributions, Fedora is unique in that, it doesn't have a off

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/19/2010 04:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, >>Michael Miles wrote: >> >>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. >>> >> Fedora

Re: Grub2 question

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:12 +0100 Timothy Murphy wrote: > What is the supposed advantage of grub2 over grub? As near as I can tell grub2 is a classic example of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect It is supposed to be easier to add support for different filesystems with loadable

Re: Grub2 question

Tom H wrote: > To be fair, the difference between grub1/2 and lilo remains that > grub1/2 don't update the mbr for every config change but only when > they are set up. > > grub2's update is the equivalent of grubby on Fedora and grub1's > update-grub on Debian/Ubuntu. What is the supposed advant

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/20/2010 05:09 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> >> I think the subject line should be changed to "Who's murdering this >> forum?" as that seems to be your only intent. >> > > If anyone is concerned about the behaviour of anyone in this list, > feel free to drop a mail to

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 01:39 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 7/19/2010 4:31 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> [...] >> How come a Red Hat employee becomes so ignorant when it comes to >> understanding patent issues? >> >> Buzz off with your stupidities about copyright and patents. It doesn't >> help you make a p

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 05:09 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > I think the subject line should be changed to "Who's murdering this > forum?" as that seems to be your only intent. > If anyone is concerned about the behaviour of anyone in this list, feel free to drop a mail to users-owner AT lists.fedor

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 05:01 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > Seems I'll have to answer this one after all... > > What's a software patent is not a copyright on code? How this moves > the discussion forward? Buzz off! > It helps to have some basic understanding of the topic in question before engaging in a d

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, > Michael Miles wrote: >> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. > > Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on > the RP

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 7/19/2010 4:31 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > [...] > How come a Red Hat employee becomes so ignorant when it comes to > understanding patent issues? > > Buzz off with your stupidities about copyright and patents. It doesn't > help you make a point. I really don't understand how come Red Hat > doesn'

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/20/2010 04:06 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> Did you notice that Sundaram's never replied to my message explaining >> that pretending that OOo not having an autoreplace option because of >> copyright matters is absolutely ridiculous since

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their >> open source download site, so it might be a bit difficult for someone >> wanting to replicate their development environment to do it. >> >

Re: suspend to RAM and NFS /home

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/16/2010 10:29 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 07/16/2010 03:10 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote: >>> I have found that I have to use the network init script rather than >>> NetworkManager. NetworkManager tries to unmount all of the NFS file system >>> before sleeping and this h

Re: virtualization without VMX cpu

solarflow99 wrote: > I have a P-4 2.8Ghz and it doesnt seem to have the VMX instructions > for virtualization. What I notice is KVM uses QEMU for the hypervisor > instead? I can't detach some hardware that I need for the VM to > recognize a USB pluged in, etc. Does anyone know if there is any wa

Re: Phone calls from laptop

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 18:57 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote: > > My laptop has a internal modem and RJ-11 connector. I want to connect > > the phone line to the laptop and by using head phones I want to make > > calls. How to do this? Is there any software available to

Re: Phone calls from laptop

RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote: > My laptop has a internal modem and RJ-11 connector. I want to connect > the phone line to the laptop and by using head phones I want to make > calls. How to do this? Is there any software available to do this? > Log onto Google Voice and use the help feature. I s

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 04:06 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > Did you notice that Sundaram's never replied to my message explaining > that pretending that OOo not having an autoreplace option because of > copyright matters is absolutely ridiculous since this replace option > is a basic high school exercise? >

Re: Firefox Beta

john wendel wrote: > I installed the latest Firefox Beta on a 32-bit F11 box, and I'm really > impressed. So, I decided to install it on my 64-bit F13 box. > > The problem - the F13 box is 64-bit only and the Firefox beta seems to > be 32-bit, so I need a set of 32-bit libraries. Since the Firef

Re: Can one now help?

> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Marko Vojinovic > To: Community support for Fedora users > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:57:12 +0100 > Subject: Re: Can one now help? > On Monday, July 19, 2010 04:48:25 JD wrote: > > I wonder why the fedora installer did not create a gpt partitioned

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 19 July 2010 21:09, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> This said, as this very message proves, it seems your only goal is to >> add noise to this thread. > > There are 60 posts currently in this thread. > > Of those, the count per person is: > > Marcel

Re: Preupgrade F11 ---> F12 ?

Patrick Bartek wrote: > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Peter Diercks wrote: > >> I am running a server under F11. It is a remote machine >> which I have no >> physical access to. It has a network connection. I wanted >> to upgrade to >> F12 using preupgrade again, but this time I am afraid I'll >> run into

Re: Can one now help?

> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Marko Vojinovic > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:35:36 +0100 > Subject: Re: Can one now help? > On Sunday, July 18, 2010 23:35:34 Parshwa Murdia wrote: > > Ok, as an aftermath, for educational purposes :-) : > > * The

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Paul Frields wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > It has little to do with the venue, and more to do with the tone > you've brought to it, Marcel. Yeah, of course, the tone! Whenever I try to bring people's attention to matters they'd

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:53:03 -0400 > Gene Heskett wrote: > >> It isn't quite that bad Tom, I have composed new stanza's for it several >> times now. > > It isn't horrible, but it is a lot more inconvenient that the current > grub, but at least

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 21:41 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote: > These are the installed plugins on my system. > > $ lt ~/.mozilla/plugins/ > total 8.0K > drwx--. 2 jallad jallad 4.0K May 28 10:15 moonlight > drwxrwxr-x. 2 jallad jallad 4.0K May 28 10:15 QuakeLive > $ lt /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ > tot

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > > > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif > file there from elsewhere on your system? That could explain why > your ldif fil

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 19 July 2010 21:09, Marcel Rieux wrote: > This said, as this very message proves, it seems your only goal is to > add noise to this thread. There are 60 posts currently in this thread. Of those, the count per person is: Marcel Rieux - 20 Rahul Sunderam - 9 Assuming that all posts are equall

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif file there > from elsewhere on your system? That could explain why your ldif file ha

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:09:32 -0400 Marcel Rieux wrote: >>> whack > As one of their employees, you're really a shame to Red Hat, either > for Red Hat letting an employee post all this nonsense, or for asking > an employee to do so. That's way over the top. There is no excuse for your remarks. Yo

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 01:39 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > So, I've sent you abusive and rude mails in private? You can post them > anytime you want That is what you did earlier without an apology and is a breach of netiquette and I have no intention of repeating your mistake > As one of their employees, y

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/19/2010 10:24 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> >> you could ask Rahul Sundaram to use a correct return address. His >> problem has been going on forever. >> > > Is that your excuse to send abusive and rude mails in private?  I don't > think

Re: SSH / permissions problem

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 06:51:22 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > --- On Wed, 7/14/10, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > > From: Gary Stainburn > > Subject: Re: SSH / permissions problem > > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > > Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 1:57 AM > > x}S飇A艀B򡼬㏄驛Zj

Re: [389-users] Users added in group via add member not able to authenticate

Typo: ldap://10.209.22.65:389/ou=people,dc=ldapser,dc=com?uid On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 16:05 -0400, Prashanth Sundaram wrote: > For apache, to enforce group member restriction follow below syntax. > > AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.airius.com/o=Airius?uid > Require group cn=Administrators, o=Airius > > Y

Re: [389-users] Users added in group via add member not able to authenticate

For apache, to enforce group member restriction follow below syntax. AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.airius.com/o=Airius?uid Require group cn=Administrators, o=Airius Yours should be: ldap://10.209.22.65:389/ou=People?uid Require group cn=IT, ou=shared,ou=people,dc=ldapser,dc=com More examples and exp

Re: sshd Authentication refused

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 06:52:51 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, David Highley wrote: > > > From: David Highley > > Subject: Re: sshd Authentication refused > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 7:52 PM > > x¥TmoÚ0þž_qb_ç¼ > > >

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 14:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > > > > > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet > >

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

On 07/19/2010 10:30 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > JD wrote: > > >> I tried it. Here's what I get: >> >> # /usr/bin/knetworkmanager >> knetworkmanager(3913): KUniqueApplication: Cannot find the D-Bus session >> server: "Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote >> application did not

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet > instead. > In any case, make sure NM is controlling your interf

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet instead. > In any case, make sure NM is controlling your interface. > > Agreed. What package is nm-applet in ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On 07/19/2010 09:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:35:37 -0400 > Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> I'm not saying this is good or bad, just that the old development is stable >> and >> virtually without cost. > Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:23 -0600, linux guy wrote: > I'm running F13, fully up to date. > > This morning I encountered a number of problems. > > 1) Evolution starts in "Offline" mode, ie it doesn't think there is a > Network connection and there is now way to put it online. Thus I > can't send

Re: DVD writing oddity

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:25 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Time to use the > --oh-crap-this-thread-has-gotten-longer-than-the-annoying-option > option. No problem, though I still don't get it. never mind. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscript

RE: XPCOM

> -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users- > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 12:14 PM > To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: XPCOM > > On 07/19/2010 06:50 AM, Smith, Herb wrote: > > H

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

On 07/19/2010 08:47 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote: Ok this time I think I have hit a legit issue with SELinux and 1.2.6 RC3. On my workstation to sync up my ldap server with production I take a ldif dump from production and load it into my system with the ldif2db.pl script. For

knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

I'm running F13, fully up to date. This morning I encountered a number of problems. 1) Evolution starts in "Offline" mode, ie it doesn't think there is a Network connection and there is now way to put it online. Thus I can't send or receive emails with it. 2) Firefox starts in "Offline" mode, b

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On 07/18/2010 04:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Out of curiosity I downloaded the GPLed source code for the > firmware in my new Netgear WNR3500L router. The first thing > I see is the build instructions which start with: > >1. This package has been built successfully on Fedora Core 2. >

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:27:23 +0300 Jonathan Dieter wrote: > You mean like > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/2 Cool! There is one. I even almost guessed the name :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: F12: Kernel 2.6.32.16-141.fc12.i686.PAE problems with Radeon drivers

Terry Barnaby wrote: > Hi, > > For info, my systems have just been updated with the kernel > 2.6.32.16-141.fc12.i686.PAE. > This is causing problems on two of them that have ATI Radeon cards. There are > occasional Kernel OOPS followed by very slow graphics. What really pisses me off when I sugge

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their > open source download site, so it might be a bit difficult for someone > wanting to replicate their development environment to do it. > > (Unless maybe there is a ar

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

JD wrote: > I tried it. Here's what I get: > > # /usr/bin/knetworkmanager > knetworkmanager(3913): KUniqueApplication: Cannot find the D-Bus session > server: "Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote > application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy > bloc

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On Monday 19 July 2010 09:38 AM, JD wrote: > Looks like Adobe has a new 64 bit flash plugin: > Not yet. :( > http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/000/6b3af6c9.html > There is a link there: > Click here for instructions to install Flash Player on a 64-bit > operating system > > Good luck Suvayu The page pres

Re: XPCOM

On 07/19/2010 06:50 AM, Smith, Herb wrote: > Hi all... > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to > FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch > Firefox it gives me the following message: > > Cannot Load XPCOM. > > Does an

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

On 07/19/2010 04:52 AM, Chris Rouch wrote: > On 17 July 2010 21:43, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Chris Rouch wrote: >> >> >>> Is it possible to configure kde to use nm-applet instead? >> Yes, >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KDE/Using_nm_applet_instead_of_knetworkmanager > > Thanks. That mostly work

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/19/2010 10:00 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, >Michael Miles wrote: > >> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. >> > Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really sho

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > > I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to > be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on the RPMfusion mailiing lists. -- user

Still no kmod for new nvidia

Hello there I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. The release is kmod 2.6.32.16-141 for 195-36.31-1 The driver is 195-36.31-2 I am not sure if it miss labelled or just not the right kmod This does not show up in update

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:35:37 -0400 Bill Davidsen wrote: > I'm not saying this is good or bad, just that the old development is stable > and > virtually without cost. Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their open source download site, so it might be a bit diffi

Re: tune2fs and luks

On 19/07/10 15:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > You need to have it luks opened first. You need to reference the device > by the device mapper name. For example: > tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/luks-9cfcdd2a-d2ff-4c30-818c-344764c7cc21 Thanks Bruno. Did the trick. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded F

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2010 01:01 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >>> Would you say use of noscript or flashblock would be a good compromise? If not what are my other options? (maybe I should start a new thread for this discussion) >> I thin

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On 07/19/2010 12:17 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On 7/19/10, *Suvayu Ali* > wrote: > > I have a copy of the "buggy" 64 bit flash(10.0.45), and it works with > the fedora version of FF 3.6 very well. I am having a problem with > _all_ > my

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

Tom Horsley wrote: > Out of curiosity I downloaded the GPLed source code for the > firmware in my new Netgear WNR3500L router. The first thing > I see is the build instructions which start with: > > 1. This package has been built successfully on Fedora Core 2. > Compiling this packa

Re: DVD writing oddity

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 22:45 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 11:33 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 16:01 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Recompiled them to use

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:53:03 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > It isn't quite that bad Tom, I have composed new stanza's for it several > times now. It isn't horrible, but it is a lot more inconvenient that the current grub, but at least on ubuntu, if you modify the grub.cfg file directly you are gonn

Re: tune2fs and luks

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 15:17:36 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Can someone set me right with tune2fs and luks encrypted drives. > Have googled but cannot find an example. > Please don't say man luks. You need to have it luks opened first. You need to reference the device by the device mapper nam

Re: XPCOM

Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 16:19: > > >> Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 >> 15:50: >>> Hi all... >>> >>> Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop >>> to >> FC13. All seemed to go

Re: XPCOM

Smith, Herb boeing.com> writes: > > Hi all... > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to FC13. All seemed to go > flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch Firefox it gives me the following message: > > Cannot Load XPCOM. > > Does anyone have

Re: Error No matching domain found for 5001 in sssd_nss.log

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/11/2010 01:08 AM, John Nissley wrote: > I will admit that getting fedora 13 to authenticate against my dirsrv > ldap server has been an interesting experience. I still do not think I > have it right since getent passwd does not display the lda

RE: XPCOM

> Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 > 15:50: > > Hi all... > > > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop > > to > FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch > Firefox > it gives me the fo

tune2fs and luks

Can someone set me right with tune2fs and luks encrypted drives. Have googled but cannot find an example. Please don't say man luks. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https:

Re: system-config-display issue Fedora13 RC3

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 23:53 -0500, David A. Paredes Rios wrote: > Hey im having problems when i try to execute system-config-display in > my fedora13 RC3 > The message im gettin is: > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py", line 378, in > >

Re: XPCOM

Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 15:50: > Hi all... > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to > FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch > Firefox it gives me the following message:

  1   2   >