On 5/18/05, Jed Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cliff Pratt wrote:
> > I've looked in the archives and not seen (ot at least, not recognised)
> > anything relevant, and I'm sure this problem is *obvious* to those in
> > the know, but it is foxing me.
> >
> > I connect to my server using ssh u
> Try cleaning the tree with mrproper (save your
> .config first) and using
> make linux ARCH=um
> (and make modules ARCH=um if you use modules)
> for the build.
I have cleaned tree using make mrproper ARCH=um
command.
And after that i created .config file by using make
xconfig ARCH=um command.
S
On 5/24/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2005 08:49, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:17:48PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> > > kill 1224 and kill -9 1224 both return without affecting the task.
> >
> > If kill -9, *as root*, does not kill a process
Hi all:
I got the IO memory emulation information from the http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/iomem.html.
CONFIG_MMAPPER is turn on in the config.But I don't know how to
" assign a file to it by putting
iomem=mmapper,file
on the command line. "
I started the uml as follow :
./linux ubd0=$HOM
(moved from another thread for clarity)
I've got things up and running using a hostfs rootfs, but now all
attempts to do things with the passwd file fail on locking errors:
(none):/etc# pwconv
pwconv: can't lock passwd file
Any ideas on this?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Saturday 21 May 2005 22:07, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:43:44AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell
> > wrote:
> > > I checked the archives for this, and couldn't find it, which
> > > seems odd to me, as it's happened
On Monday 23 May 2005 22:02, Patrick Allison wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm having some problems with enabling SMP in a 2.6.11.8 UML kernel.
> Everything works fine (with only 1 CPU, of course) until I specify the
> number of CPUs on the command line via ncpus=4 (or whatever).
> Then I get
> Checking f
On 24/05/05, Patrick Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm having some problems with enabling SMP in a 2.6.11.8 UML kernel.
> Everything works fine (with only 1 CPU, of course) until I specify the
> number of CPUs on the command line via ncpus=4 (or whatever).
>
I recall a list on
Hi all:
I'm having some problems with enabling SMP in a 2.6.11.8 UML kernel.
Everything works fine (with only 1 CPU, of course) until I specify the
number of CPUs on the command line via ncpus=4 (or whatever).
Then I get
Checking for /proc/mm...not found
Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK
On Monday 23 May 2005 18:54, Simon Hall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build UML on x86_64 and have run into a compile problem.
>
> Host: Sun v40z, dual Opteron running Redhat Enterprise Linux 4, kernel
> 2.6.9-5.0.3.ELsmp, gcc version 3.4.3, binutils 2.15.92.
>
> I'm trying to build a UML kernel v
On Monday 23 May 2005 16:06, Louai Al-Awami wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I managed to get UML to run and communicates through a network.
>
> My only problem is the redundant consoles I got per UML, where I have for
> each UML 1 terminal + 2 Virtual Consoles.
The 1 terminal problem can be removed if you use
On Monday 23 May 2005 06:57, Dinesh Ahuja wrote:
> Ian,
>
> > Please supply to the list the version of the kernel
> > you are using what UML patches you are using (if
>
> any) > and your compiler version.
>
> The details are as follows:
>
> 1. Host Kernel : 2.4.20-6 [ default kernel with Red
> Hat
On Sunday 22 May 2005 08:49, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:17:48PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> > kill 1224 and kill -9 1224 both return without affecting the task.
>
> If kill -9, *as root*, does not kill a process, you have hit a
> kernel bug. Period. You should probably r
On Saturday 21 May 2005 15:30, Liu Yong wrote:
> My host OS is linux-2.6.11.8 from kernel.org, whiching running in FC3.
> My Guest OS is linux-2.6.11.8 patched by uml-2.6.11.8-bs5.patch.bz2.
> But when I run the command ./linux debug in skas mode. It can't fire
> up the debug xterm.
That syntax is
On Saturday 21 May 2005 22:07, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:43:44AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > I checked the archives for this, and couldn't find it, which seems
> > odd to me, as it's happened to me every time I've managed to get a
> > root hostfs mount working, acr
On Friday 20 May 2005 12:00, Yi Shu LIU wrote:
> Thank you very much, I'm an idiot :P
> But after using
> UML2# (sleep 5; echo hello; sleep 1) > /dev/vc/7
> instead, there's still a problem: the script in UML2 works fine, but in the
> terminal of UML1, after printing "hello" and a blank line, i
On Monday 23 May 2005 16:51, Nix wrote:
> [Sorry for the delay: holiday and illness collide.]
Hope you get back from illness soon!
(Well, I should really give a refresh to my English, I'm still at English 98
Second Edition, maybe English XP is better!)
> `Expand', from SMTP. i.e., `what warnings?
Hi,
I'm trying to build UML on x86_64 and have run into a compile problem.
Host: Sun v40z, dual Opteron running Redhat Enterprise Linux 4, kernel
2.6.9-5.0.3.ELsmp, gcc version 3.4.3, binutils 2.15.92.
I'm trying to build a UML kernel version 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 with patches
from http://user-mod
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:02:48AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Are you on the same network as the machine, or are you remote? If you're
> remote, have you ensured that you're machines default route is still active
> after you've reconfigured for bridging?
Yup, the interface dont have a default
Are you on the same network as the machine, or are you remote? If you're
remote, have you ensured that you're machines default route is still active
after you've reconfigured for bridging?
Tony
>>> Celso González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/23/05 07:31AM >>>
Hi people
I will try to explain my situ
On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] moaned:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2005 01:46, Blaisorblade wrote:
>> Also, about TLS and such: do you know where I can download the userspace
>> example code?
> Here I refer to futexes, sorry.
/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/futex-2.2.tar.gz, I think.
--
`Once aga
[Sorry for the delay: holiday and illness collide.]
On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2005 01:17, Nix wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
>> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
>> >> At any rate, specifying the paths
Hi people
I will try to explain my situation.
I have a linux machine with a physical interface and 2 public internet
ips.
I have installed a uml machine (2.6.12-rc4 works great) and i want to
assign one of the public ips to the daemons in the uml machine while
the host machine (vanilla 2.6.11.10)
Hi all,
I managed to get UML to run and communicates through a network.
My only problem is the redundant consoles I got per UML, where I have for
each UML 1 terminal + 2 Virtual Consoles.
Is there an option to remove those extra annoying consoles??
Regards
24 matches
Mail list logo
