On 5/24/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 22 May 2005 08:49, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:17:48PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote: > > > kill 1224 and kill -9 1224 both return without affecting the task. > > > > If kill -9, *as root*, does not kill a process, you have hit a > > kernel bug. Period. You should probably reboot. > 2.6.10 has indeed a kernel bug in this situation. You should probably update > the host to 2.6.11. > > However, kill -9 is not sufficient if you don't do, after, a kill -CONT. > Definitely... Somebody argued it's a bug but Linux works this way, and I'm > not in the standards world. >
Ah! Thanks. I stumbled on that solution in the end. Nice to have it confirmed though. Cheers, Cliff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
