> Try cleaning the tree with mrproper (save your > .config first) and using > make linux ARCH=um > (and make modules ARCH=um if you use modules) > for the build.
I have cleaned tree using make mrproper ARCH=um command. And after that i created .config file by using make xconfig ARCH=um command. Some sites suggested to modify Makefile before building UML, so I did that. I have commneted out in my makefile #ifndef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER #CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer #endif And removed -O2 option from following HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer HOSTCXXFLAGS = -O2 > However, using such a old UML kernel is really not > recommended, you can upgrade the UML kernel without > upgrading the host kernel. Is it possible to have UML kernel [ guest kernel ] of higher version than the host kernel. In my case, as suggested by you, I am planning to have kernel 2.6.10 [ which has UML build in it] as guest kernel and host kernel as 2.4.20. As 2.6.10 already had UML built-in, this will keep me away from patch work. Please tell me whether the steps to build UML kernel from an unpatched kernel are same or any difference. Thanks & Regards Dinesh ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
