On Sunday 22 May 2005 08:49, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:17:48PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote: > > kill 1224 and kill -9 1224 both return without affecting the task. > > If kill -9, *as root*, does not kill a process, you have hit a > kernel bug. Period. You should probably reboot. 2.6.10 has indeed a kernel bug in this situation. You should probably update the host to 2.6.11.
However, kill -9 is not sufficient if you don't do, after, a kill -CONT. Definitely... Somebody argued it's a bug but Linux works this way, and I'm not in the standards world. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
