Re: Moving controls smoothly around the screen

I use Animation Engine to smoothly move things. Gerry On 14/04/2013, at 10:59 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > I need to move all the objects underneath down to > make room for the hidden group associated with the button to be displayed. ___ use-livecode

Re: Moving controls smoothly around the screen

Pete. I am not understanding. Are there several objects (buttons and/or groups), but at least one group, under each button? And there are a bunch of these "object stacks" vertically aligned, so there is a column of them? I would have thought you would show and hide as needed, within each "

Re: The "last" group

Ah yes, I see it - that's what Scott suggested. Pete lcSQL Software On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:36 PM, wrote: > Check out the user note in the dictionary. > > > Craig Newman > > > > -Original Message- > From: Peter Haworth > To: How to use LiveCode > Sent: Sat, A

Moving controls smoothly around the screen

I have a stack with a number of buttons and groups on it,all vertically aligned. The groups are initially hidden so the screen looks like it has a series of buttons on it. When a button is clicked, I need to move all the objects underneath down to make room for the hidden group associated with th

Re: The "last" group

Check out the user note in the dictionary. Craig Newman -Original Message- From: Peter Haworth To: How to use LiveCode Sent: Sat, Apr 13, 2013 6:33 pm Subject: Re: The "last" group Thanks John. That would have worked I think but I went with SCott's suggestion to use the templateGr

Re: Is it just me, again?

Thank you Mark, that clears up a lot of questions. It sounds like I just need to remove password protection, come up with a license agreement that says what users can and cannot do with it, and include a copyright notice (it's already in the "About" screen but maybe it needs to be in the code too)

Re: on-rev: THOR server problem

Yes, just tried mine and they are inaccessible. Over the past couple of months I've experienced lots of outages and slow performance. If I hadn't of bought a founders package I would have moved on. But it's a big hassle to move everything though. Best regards, Marty Knapp Knappster Solutions L

Re: on-rev: THOR server problem

Thor has been on and off for a while - tonight is especially laggy :( On 14/04/2013 00:06, Nicolas Cueto wrote: Anyone else on on-rev's THOR server experiencing very long delays? cPanel can connect somewhat after the delay, but web-pages are only returning error messages. -- Nicolas Cueto

on-rev: THOR server problem

Anyone else on on-rev's THOR server experiencing very long delays? cPanel can connect somewhat after the delay, but web-pages are only returning error messages. -- Nicolas Cueto ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit thi

Re: Is it just me, again?

Minor OSS licensing note (tell me to shut up if they get dull)... From: Dr. Hawkins To: How to use LiveCode Sent: Saturday, 13 April 2013, 1:48 Subject: Re: Is it just me, again? > There is a lot of room in the OSS world for a license between the free > BSD/

Re: Is it just me, again?

Hi Pete, Here's how it can work for you. If you create your lcStackBrowser with the commercial version of LiveCode and simply assert your copyright (e.g. include a copyright notice) and sell it, without password protection to both commercial and community users then everything is fine. The defa

Re: The "last" group

Thanks John. That would have worked I think but I went with SCott's suggestion to use the templateGroup Pete lcSQL Software On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:54 PM, John Craig wrote: > Worth a try; > > set the name of the owner of the last group to "grpA" > > Sent from my iPhon

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

The fancy techniques which watermark videos and images by hiding something in the image data itself exist because they are extremely hard to detect and thus remove. If you simply open the image with a hex editor and type in your copyright details then someone else can open it in their hex editor

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

yeah we love you Richmond, don't ever change! On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 4/13/13 3:33 PM, Richmond wrote: > >> On 04/13/2013 10:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: >> >>> Jacque- >>> >>> Saturday, April 13, 2013, 12:32:14 PM, you wrote: >>> >>> LOL. "Password no work." >>

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 4/13/13 3:33 PM, Richmond wrote: On 04/13/2013 10:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Jacque- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 12:32:14 PM, you wrote: LOL. "Password no work." Ah. It does seem like a good day to poke fun at Richmond. I thought round the Use-List it was 'Open Season' all year round on Ri

Re: The "last" group

Worth a try; set the name of the owner of the last group to "grpA" Sent from my iPhone On 13 Apr 2013, at 21:15, Peter Haworth wrote: > I think I ran into this a couple of years back but don't remember what the > workaround is. > > In some cases,, "the last group" does not return a reference

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 04/13/2013 11:43 PM, stephen barncard wrote: that is not the same thing. The PS plugin uses another technique to invisibly imbed the code in the photo. Gimp and others use a graphic overlay, which degrades / cheapens / uglifies the image. You are quite right. But, how, if the code is in

Revisiting iOS App to App Communication?

Hi All… Still interested in the easiest way to send text data between iOS apps in the same location, on the same network (classroom). I have seen rrsockets referenced in the past. However, wasn't that just an example used to demonstrate the creation of externals in LC? I'm not sure if it is st

Re: The "last" group

Thanks Scott, that works great. FWIW, I think I figured out why this happens. I believe "last" in this context refers to the group with the highest layer number. When I create the outer group, all the groups within it have to be relayered to have a higher layer number than the outer group, qed.

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

that is not the same thing. The PS plugin uses another technique to invisibly imbed the code in the photo. Gimp and others use a graphic overlay, which degrades / cheapens / uglifies the image. On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 04/13/2013 09:29 PM, stephen barncard wrote:

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:47 PM, william humphrey wrote: > I agree. Use short words. Always. I always wondered why "monosyllabic" wasn't. -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig ___ use-livecode mailing list use-liveco

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 04/13/2013 10:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Jacque- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 12:32:14 PM, you wrote: LOL. "Password no work." Ah. It does seem like a good day to poke fun at Richmond. I thought round the Use-List it was 'Open Season' all year round on Richmond :) Richmond. As oppose

Re: The "last" group

One workaround is to set the name of the templateGroup before creating a new group. This allows you to refer to the group by a custom name after it is created, since "last" may not always be last. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX Design On Apr 13, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Pet

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 04/13/2013 10:32 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 4/13/13 2:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Setting and using protected stacks is a feature of the commercial version of LC and is explicitly not supported in the OSS version. By design. That's how it's supposed to work. You can NOT use passwords to p

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 04/13/2013 10:26 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 12:14:47 PM, you wrote: I only tried to set a password using LC OSS to see how the thing would react! Now, now... you said... so, obviously, the good folk in Edinburgh did their work vis-a-vis stopping password p

The "last" group

I think I ran into this a couple of years back but don't remember what the workaround is. In some cases,, "the last group" does not return a reference to the last group created. I'm not sure of all the circumstances that cause this but here's my situation. My script creates several groups, let's

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

And there's digital watermarking via steganography. "As a simple example, a sender might start with an innocuous image file and adjust the color of every 100th pixel to correspond to a letter in the alphabet, a change so subtle that someone not specifically looking for it is unlikely to notice it.

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

Jacque- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 12:32:14 PM, you wrote: > LOL. "Password no work." Ah. It does seem like a good day to poke fun at Richmond. As opposed the a good day to poke fun at Mark, which are only days containing the letter "a"... -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net __

Re: LiveCode and Rails

On 4/13/13 1:30 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Jacque- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 11:01:33 AM, you wrote: Thanks. I agree, XML is to be avoided whenever possible. I'll talk to the client about the databse. Alternate suggestion if this isn't an off-the-shelf Rails app: can the Rails developer supply y

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

I agree. Use short words. Always. On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:32 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 4/13/13 2:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > > Setting and using protected stacks is a feature of the commercial >> version of LC and is explicitly not supported in the OSS version. >> >> By design. >> >> Tha

Re: LiveCode and Rails

On 4/13/13 2:17 PM, Phil Davis wrote: Jacque, Another JSON alternative is the late Mark Smith's JSON lib stack. I use it in several projects and it has served quite well. http://revonline2.runrev.com/stack/82/LibJson-1-0b However I'm using version 1.0.4b which includes these changes: -

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 4/13/13 2:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Setting and using protected stacks is a feature of the commercial version of LC and is explicitly not supported in the OSS version. By design. That's how it's supposed to work. You can NOT use passwords to protect stacks in the OSS version. If it's stil

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

Richmond- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 12:14:47 PM, you wrote: > I only tried to set a password using LC OSS to see how the thing would > react! Now, now... you said... >> so, obviously, the good folk in Edinburgh did their work vis-a-vis >> stopping password >> protection in LC OSS properly! >> d

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

Richmond- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 11:50:39 AM, you wrote: > The point of my e-mail is that, I suspect, for an awful lot of people > who download LC OSS and start using it, this will be their first > experinece with Open Source Software, I'm not entirely sure that's true. > and they may be co

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 4/13/13 1:47 PM, Richmond wrote: the same with single quotes (as per your example The example was enclosed in double quotes, so I was just following good literary standards. I should have put it on a separate line. LiveCode doesn't understand single quotes, and if you were to type it that

Re: LiveCode and Rails

Jacque, Another JSON alternative is the late Mark Smith's JSON lib stack. I use it in several projects and it has served quite well. http://revonline2.runrev.com/stack/82/LibJson-1-0b However I'm using version 1.0.4b which includes these changes: - libJson 1.0.4b Author: mark Smith Dat

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 04/13/2013 10:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 11:47:37 AM, you wrote: so, obviously, the good folk in Edinburgh did their work vis-a-vis stopping password protection in LC OSS properly! doing the same sort of thing in the commercial version did not throw up tho

RE: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

> > I have a picture which is copyrighted, I have a license from the > > copyright owner to use this picture and release it in a standalone. > > > > However, I do not have permission to pass on permission for other > > people to pass on the picture; they have to revert to the copyright > > holde

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

Richmond- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 11:47:37 AM, you wrote: > so, obviously, the good folk in Edinburgh did their work vis-a-vis > stopping password > protection in LC OSS properly! > doing the same sort of thing in the commercial version did not throw up > those > error messages. Ah! You're tr

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 04/13/2013 09:29 PM, stephen barncard wrote: Photoshop has a plugin and a paid service to apply invisible watermarks to images. They've had this for over 20 years. As most serious photographers have photoshop, I would assume it's been used a lot over the years, even pre-internet. http://grap

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 04/13/2013 09:25 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: Not sure what the point of your email is, The point of my e-mail is that, I suspect, for an awful lot of people who download LC OSS and start using it, this will be their first experinece with Open Source Software, and they may be completely unaware

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 04/13/2013 09:21 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 4/13/13 2:53 AM, Richmond wrote: I know how to password a stack that is going to be rolled into a standalone, BUT, I don't know how to password a stack that is going to stay a stack rather than be rolled into a standalone. It's simple, but we

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

Good point. And furthermore, even if an image is not watermarked, it may still be copyrighted. I'm no lawyer, but it is my understanding that in the US there is an implied copyright applied to anything that is not explicitly put into the public domain--which is why I created the music backgroun

Re: LiveCode and Rails

Jacque- Saturday, April 13, 2013, 11:01:33 AM, you wrote: > Thanks. I agree, XML is to be avoided whenever possible. I'll talk to > the client about the databse. Alternate suggestion if this isn't an off-the-shelf Rails app: can the Rails developer supply you with a RESTful interface for what yo

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

Photoshop has a plugin and a paid service to apply invisible watermarks to images. They've had this for over 20 years. As most serious photographers have photoshop, I would assume it's been used a lot over the years, even pre-internet. On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 04/13

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

Not sure what the point of your email is, but sound files are often mixed with a looping track of voice speaking the company name, or protected with white noise or a simple beat. Movie clips are watermarked with a translucent image, same as images. Maybe not entirely off topic, these guys are try

Re: Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

On 4/13/13 2:53 AM, Richmond wrote: I know how to password a stack that is going to be rolled into a standalone, BUT, I don't know how to password a stack that is going to stay a stack rather than be rolled into a standalone. It's simple, but we will only tell you if you agree that the free

Re: LiveCode and Rails

On 4/13/13 2:37 AM, Monte Goulding wrote: Don't forget there's a dual licensed cross platform external that does ArrayToJSON so all you need to do is worry about the array ;-) That would be lovely. This is the app where I'm disallowed any add-ons. But if it comes right down to it I may push my

Re: LiveCode and Rails

On 4/13/13 1:50 AM, Mark Wieder wrote: Jacque- Friday, April 12, 2013, 11:37:47 PM, you wrote: I need to pass data to and from a Rails app. I'd rather not deal with XML or JSON if I don't have to. Are there any simpler solutions? A Rails app is a web frontend to a database. Do you have acces

[ANN] Open source MobGUI iOS controls - first draft

A while ago I started rewriting some controls to use the new before and after behavior handlers. The results are custom controls with no library code in their scripts - I think it's a lot cleaner. The link below is to the first draft. The library is a one button palette. Just use the button t

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 04/13/2013 08:39 PM, stephen barncard wrote: On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Richmond wrote: https://picasaweb.google.com/**lh/photo/**g9YCDCoXTux3elqSvUr3TdMTjNZETY** myPJy0liipFm0 you might be not consid

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Richmond wrote: > https://picasaweb.google.com/**lh/photo/**g9YCDCoXTux3elqSvUr3TdMTjNZETY** > myPJy0liipFm0 you might be not considering that truly copyrighted images are waterma

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 04/13/2013 08:21 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richmond wrote: That is going to be an awful lot of fun for an awful lot of people tracking down things such as clip-art copyright restrictions. But that' really no different than it is right now: you just can't dist

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richmond wrote: > That is going to be an awful lot of fun for an awful lot of people tracking > down things such > as clip-art copyright restrictions. But that' really no different than it is right now: you just can't distribute something that you don't have ari

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 04/13/2013 08:17 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Richmond wrote: I have a picture which is copyrighted, I have a license from the copyright owner to use this picture and release it in a standalone. However, I do not have permission to pass on permission for other peo

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Richmond wrote: > > I have a picture which is copyrighted, I have a license from the copyright > owner > to use this picture and release it in a standalone. > > However, I do not have permission to pass on permission for other people > to pass on the picture; they

Re: setting up Linux for LiveCode and other dev questions

On 04/13/2013 07:48 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: Yes, I had the choice of logging in and using LiveCode, or not logging in and not using LiveCode. Very droll. From a personal point of view I don't mind logging in and sending whatever info to RunRev as they know all about my "warts" already :)

Re: setting up Linux for LiveCode and other dev questions

Yes, I had the choice of logging in and using LiveCode, or not logging in and not using LiveCode. On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Richmond wrote: >>> That fixed things, LiveCode installed from the downloads folder just fine. >>> I did do the register stage, given there was no choice, and it seem

Re: Is it just me, again?

J. Landman Gay wrote: On 13/04/2013, at 9:53 AM, "Cal Horner" wrote: I can't quite put my finger on it, but it seems something is askew. Think about it like this. You've written a big commercial software program and are selling it successfully. It brings in money. You've protected your intel

Re: 'Test' Button in revMenubar

On 04/13/2013 06:21 PM, Roger Eller wrote: On Linux and Windows, the same button, when setup correctly, will test your stack in the Android emulator. Well that's all rather lovely; but the tooltips for that button are not. Richmond. ___ use-livecod

Re: Foreign characters in file names

Hi Thomas, If you are on Mac OS, you can use AppleScript. This is for two bytes file name of UTF8 text. on mouseUp put "choose file with prompt" "e"e&return into asScript put "set openFile to result"&return after asScript put "try"&return after asScript put "read openFile" & return af

Re: 'Test' Button in revMenubar

On Linux and Windows, the same button, when setup correctly, will test your stack in the Android emulator. ~Roger On Apr 13, 2013 10:38 AM, "Richmond" wrote: > On 04/13/2013 05:28 PM, John Dixon wrote: > >> It does work in the OSS version, but does not show as active unless you >> have set corre

Re: Intersect Opaque Pixels Broken?

Thanks very much, Neil! On Apr 13, 2013, at 2:43 AM, n...@runrev.com wrote: > Hi Roger et al. > > We are aware of this bug and its in our quality control database- > > http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10828 > > It should be fixed in the next release. > > Kind Regards, > > Neil Roge

Re: 'Test' Button in revMenubar

On 04/13/2013 05:28 PM, John Dixon wrote: It does work in the OSS version, but does not show as active unless you have set correct standalone settings from the file menu... Yar, man, I was being a bit stupid there; had overlooked the fact that the iOS thing wasn't going to play ball on Linux

RE: 'Test' Button in revMenubar

It does work in the OSS version, but does not show as active unless you have set correct standalone settings from the file menu... > Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:21:48 +0300 > From: richmondmathew...@gmail.com > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Subject: Re: 'Test' Button in revMenubar > > On 04/

Re: 'Test' Button in revMenubar

On 04/13/2013 05:12 PM, John Dixon wrote: It will launch your stack, if you have set it up correctly, in the iOS simulator... Aha; and that is why it is non-functional in LC OSS, as it won't work with iOS. Might not be a bad thing if that button were removed from the OSS version. Richmond.

Foreign characters in file names

Hello, I have a problem with foreign characters in file names, like Cyrillic or Japanese. E.g. I didn't find a way to get the correct name of a folder "Bilder Ж" either using "answer folder…" or dragDrop with dragData. Is there a way to handle this situation? Best regards Thomas Fischer ___

RE: 'Test' Button in revMenubar

It will launch your stack, if you have set it up correctly, in the iOS simulator... > Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:05:04 +0300 > From: richmondmathew...@gmail.com > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Subject: 'Test' Button in revMenubar > > There's a 'Test' button in the revMenubar stack to the ri

'Test' Button in revMenubar

There's a 'Test' button in the revMenubar stack to the right of the 'Dictionary' button with a sort of cogwheel icon. It does not seem to do anything. A bit sneakily the button is referred to as "Deploy" and contains an extremely uninstructive script: on mouseUp revIDEDeployAction pass

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 04/13/2013 01:15 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: On 13/04/2013, at 5:44 PM, Richmond wrote: There is also no reason why, to do this, RunRev would have to open source the password. It's the code behind password protection they can't open source because it exposes all the commercial software dev

Re: Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

On 13/04/2013, at 6:01 PM, Richmond wrote: > > I assume that I am not allowed to run off a standalone from LC OSS > containing that picture. Right, you would need to only use stuff that's licensed with a GPL compatible license. -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software development service

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 13/04/2013, at 5:44 PM, Richmond wrote: > There is also no reason why, to do this, RunRev would have to open source the > password. It's the code behind password protection they can't open source because it exposes all the commercial software developed on the platform. They aren't even op

Re: LC community : Bandwidth Limit Exceeded

Yes. Sorry for any inconvenience. It should be fixed now. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/ LiveCode: Everyone can code On 13/04/2013 09:35, "Ludovic Thébault" wrote: >Too much success ? > >___ >use-live

Livecode OSS and its flat icons

Rather dreary. Try these: http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/GIFTS/LiveCodeOSS3D.zip Not rocket science, and if you don't like them, make your own and let us know :) Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please vis

Re: Intersect Opaque Pixels Broken?

Hi Roger et al. We are aware of this bug and its in our quality control database- http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10828 It should be fixed in the next release. Kind Regards, Neil Roger -- RunRev Support Team ~ http://www.runrev.com Support Open Source LiveCode on Kick-starter http://

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 13 Apr 2013, at 08:44, Richmond wrote: > Here's Richmond's sticky finger! > > It would be perfectly possible to have passworded plugins in the plugins > folder for LC OSS without > the end-user being able to access the password, any more than they could > access the password on a protected p

Re: GITing around.

Richmond No problem here. This is the start of the first card: For Revolution we use a simplified form of the word-breaking algorithm. In this we treat the Unicode word breaking classes as follows: CR => None LF => None Newline => None Extend => ALetter Format => ALetter => ALetter

GITing around.

I went here: https://github.com/runrev/livecode/tree/master/engine and downloaded "unicode_tables.rev" and tried to open it with Livecode and got this: "file is not a stack" at the risk of sounding goofy (again), if that file is not a stack why does it have the suffix .rev, and how can one open

LC community : Bandwidth Limit Exceeded

Too much success ? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

I have a picture which is copyrighted, I have a license from the copyright owner to use this picture and release it in a standalone. However, I do not have permission to pass on permission for other people to pass on the picture; they have to revert to the copyright holder to get s/his permissio

Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

Never to late to appear really goofy :) - Commercial version only - I know how to password a stack that is going to be rolled into a standalone, BUT, I don't know how to password a stack that is going to stay a stack rather than be

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 04/13/2013 10:34 AM, Monte Goulding wrote: RunRev should exert complete control over their repo and I'd be very concerned if they didn't. That doesn't prevent someone from forking it and doing something like making a free HyperCard clone or some other IDE. You don't have to request changes

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 04/13/2013 08:44 AM, Monte Goulding wrote: On 13/04/2013, at 9:53 AM, "Cal Horner" wrote: So, help me get this hypothesis correct then: "I can use anything that is developed in LC OSS within my commercial LC environment. But if there is a password protection on something I have been using

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 04/13/2013 03:48 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Cal Horner wrote: "I can use anything that is developed in LC OSS within my commercial LC environment. But if there is a password protection on something I have been using for awhile, and wish to continue to use, that p

Re: LiveCode and Rails

Don't forget there's a dual licensed cross platform external that does ArrayToJSON so all you need to do is worry about the array ;-) -- M E R Goulding Software development services mergExt - There's an external for that! On 13/04/2013, at 4:37 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote: > I need to pass dat

Re: Is it just me, again?

RunRev should exert complete control over their repo and I'd be very concerned if they didn't. That doesn't prevent someone from forking it and doing something like making a free HyperCard clone or some other IDE. You don't have to request changes be pulled into their repo but if you do then the

Re: setting up Linux for LiveCode and other dev questions

On 04/13/2013 01:59 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Colin Holgate wrote: Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted. I found these instructions somewhere: sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get i

Re: Is it just me, again?

On 04/13/2013 12:34 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: OK, now I see what you mean. Don't know how feasible it would be but maybe plugins loaded at startup wouldn't give a message, only those that are loaded from the plugins menu. I'm probably going to submit an enhancement request for this and a separat

Re: setting up Linux for LiveCode and other dev questions

On 04/13/2013 12:12 AM, Roger Eller wrote: A 64-bit version was listed in the kickstarter stretch goals. Maybe that was in the back of your mind when you downloaded it. But stretch is as stretch does, and looking at RunRev's list of goals they will be, indeed, stretched to provide a 64 bit b