On 04/13/2013 11:43 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
that is not the same thing. The PS plugin uses another technique to
invisibly imbed the code in the photo.
Gimp and others use a graphic overlay, which degrades / cheapens / uglifies
the image.
You are quite right.
But, how, if the code is invisible can it be seen by those who wish to
check if the image is copyrighted or not?
-------------------
Of course, one could open an image with a hex editor and type in one's
copyright details
and save it again, and that would serve.
https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/bless/ { just tried that, and
it is fine ]
Richmond.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com>wrote:
On 04/13/2013 09:29 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
Photoshop has a plugin and a paid service to apply invisible watermarks to
images. They've had this for over 20 years.
As most serious photographers have photoshop, I would assume it's been
used
a lot over the years, even pre-internet.
http://graphicssoft.about.com/**od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-**
watermark.htm<http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-watermark.htm>
Richmond.
______________________________**_________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode>
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
