I agree. Use short words. Always.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:32 PM, J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com>wrote: > On 4/13/13 2:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > > Setting and using protected stacks is a feature of the commercial >> version of LC and is explicitly not supported in the OSS version. >> >> By design. >> >> That's how it's supposed to work. >> >> You can NOT use passwords to protect stacks in the OSS version. >> >> If it's still not clear let me know and I'll use shorter words. >> >> > LOL. "Password no work." > > I don't get all the outrage. The security module omission was noted in the > Kickstarter description and is footnoted in the RR web page that explains > the differences between the commercial and OSS versions (and it's the only > difference.) The logic behind the omission makes sense to anyone who does > commercial work and needs to protect their IP. > > Richmond, I was poking fun at you because you wanted to password protect > your work while using an OSS app that would have exposed your password to > everyone if it had included the code for it. > > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > ______________________________**_________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode> > -- http://www.bluewatermaritime.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
