that is not the same thing. The PS plugin uses another technique to invisibly imbed the code in the photo.
Gimp and others use a graphic overlay, which degrades / cheapens / uglifies the image. On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 04/13/2013 09:29 PM, stephen barncard wrote: > >> Photoshop has a plugin and a paid service to apply invisible watermarks to >> images. They've had this for over 20 years. >> As most serious photographers have photoshop, I would assume it's been >> used >> a lot over the years, even pre-internet. >> > > http://graphicssoft.about.com/**od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-** > watermark.htm<http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-watermark.htm> > > > Richmond. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode> > -- Stephen Barncard San Francisco Ca. USA more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
