I'm closing this bug as "invalid" because it's a mess of different
issues, and I don't think the initial problem (network manager plugin
not handling split routes properly) still stands.
If you feel you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new
report. If you're using NetworkManager rathe
i am having the same problem and i can't even ping individual ip's like
of google.it says operation not permitted.plz help how do i resolve dis
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124
** Attachment removed: "unnamed"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vpnc/+bug/124663/+attachment/291600/+files/unnamed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124663
Title:
If you connect using vpnc on the command line you won't have this issue.
http://www.debuntu.org/how-to-connect-to-a-cisco-vpn-using-vpnc
--
No default internet traffic after connecting to VPN
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124663
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Is there still any possibility to resolve this VPN issue on Intrepid?
When I connect to a VPN I can't use my email or access any websites...
so VPN just gets useless. I would really appreciate if someone gives an
advice on how to fix this.
--
No default internet traffic after connecting to VPN
ht
I have the box as well, however, for the last couple updates, it has been
grayed out. For the life of me, there is no option I can configure to allow
me to add text in to that field.
In 8.04/10 I was able modify this field after an import of our company's
PCF file.
If I'm missing something rea
Version7x, are you referring to the "Routes..." dialog under the IPv4
tab? It appears to be there on my Jaunty box (as of today, anyway).
All,
The behavior of sending only internal traffic through the VPN tunnel is
commonly called "split tunneling". (Search on Wikipedia for more info.) While
Following up on MM's post above...
In 8.10 (and possibly otheres) there was a feature in Network manager to
add subnets to force to use the vpn traffic. This works wonderfully for
many situtuations (if you know all of the subnets you'll be using and
don't have any duplicates). However in 9.04, t
This honestly is distro-specific. Xandros will leave the old default route and
just add the one that the VPN tells it to add. The result is that Firefox
still hits the gateway page that yells at he user to start the vpn
client..when they already have.
Current behaviour on Ubuntu is to replace
Has this issue (VPNc / Network Manager dropping internet traffic) been
resolved? I have been searching the net for the past week hoping to find
a solution. I am running FC10 (2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.i686) and receive
the exact same behavior described by Balaji. Although I'm not on the
Ubuntu platfo
Then you can do that using the "route" command. The fact is that when
it is by default configured the way you want, everyone who *requires* a
VPN to get any internet access at all gets NONE and thus have no way to
read online explanations of how to set which applications should use
which route. I
I know I'm late to this party but...
I see netzier and Mackenzie Morgan's point, that once you've established
a VPN tunnel all traffic should go through it as a security feature, but
I still prefer the convenience of routing some traffic through my ISP,
too. I too wish someone brighter than I cou
> My guess is they thought it was unnecessary and wanted to simplify the
> GUI. I was talking about security policy because the reporter was
> asking that NM *ignore* the network's settings and never set the default
> route that the network tries to push.
>
OK, thanks for the clarification.
I'll
> Are you guys saying that the Network Manager project has intentionally
> removed these options between .6 and .7 in order to enforce the stricter
> security policy?
My guess is they thought it was unnecessary and wanted to simplify the
GUI. I was talking about security policy because the repo
I am having this problem with network-manager-openvpn but the discussion
seems relevant. In my case, in version .6 of nm-openvpn, there was an
option (not the default) that said "Only use VPN for these
addresses...". In .7, I have been unable to replicate that setting and
therefore lose my fast l
To expand upon that:
VPNs are supposed to be as if you were on that network. They are encrypted
with IPSec so that no data is transmitted unencrypted on the local network.
Instead, everything goes through the encrypted tunnel. If any data is allowed
to automatically circumvent the tunnel, the
I agree with netzier. This isn't a bug. Network-manager-vpnc is
broken, in my opinion, for *not* putting everything through the default
route.
--
No default internet traffic after connecting to VPN
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124663
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
In answer to what Balaij describes in his "use case 3"
(inhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vpnc/+bug/124663/comments/23):
That is precisely what enterprise networks don't want to happen, because
it's a security nightmare. If I had a user trying this on my employer's
remote access VPN, I'd
I can reproducible connect with the command line vpnc with the internet
connection being tunneled correctly. However if I use the same
connection details with knetworkmanager internet is not tunneled and I
can only connect network hosts in the network I vpn into.
--
No default internet traffic af
Do add a comment on this bug and provide a link to your new bug if you are
filing a new one.
Your problem appears pretty closely related. As I suggested earlier, it
appears that nm-vpnc is doing some extra step that is offending. It is doing
more stuff than vpnc does and that is the real problem.
OK there's what I've got:
- If I'm on campus using a wired network, I can access anything.
- If I'm on wireless using the command line vpnc, I can access anything.
- If I'm on wireless using the network-manager-vpnc GUI, I can't access
anything.
So, I should file this as a separate bug?
On Fri,
Morgan,
Using sudo is the right way to use vpnc. The problem is not that. This is
explained below:
Case 0: Not connected to VPN
Description: Can browse the web freely. This is heaven. But I can't see my
company's internal stuff. This is intended. I need VPN to connect.
Case 1: You are connected
OK if I connect using network-manager-vpnc, all traffic runs into the
"please connect to the VPN" gateway page. If I use the "sudo vpnc" command,
though, it all works perfectly fine. Is that the same for you guys?
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:47 PM, integr8e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With me, >
With me, >>>all<<< network traffic was stopped whenever I connected to
my university's VPN tunnel; I got it working, though, following Balaji's
post (thanks, by the way). Maybe resolvconf was the culprit???
--
No default internet traffic after connecting to VPN
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12
I'm confused. Are you guys saying stuff *does* go through the VPN that
you don't want to go through the tunnel or that nothing's going through
the tunnel? On Hardy, nothing goes through the tunnel. That's the
problem I'm having. I just keep getting the "please connect to the VPN"
page. Is this
Try out installing/reinstalling the following packages:
pptpd, pptp-linux, network-manager-pptp, vpnc, network-manager-vpnc,
bcrelay, openvpn, network-manager-openvpn, ebox-openvpn
Also do make sure the package resolvconf is uninstalled. Thereafter the
nm-vpnc should work.
When I migrated from F
Oddly, I never had this problem back during Gutsy like all you did, but
now that I'm using Hardy, my network traffic has ceased to go through
the VPN and I have to use the command line VPN client. I don't mind
using the command line one too much...but I imagine everybody at my
school that relies o
I don't understand how the specific fix would work, but the general
process towards a resolution would be for someone to investigate the
code and find out why and how the default route is being adjusted, for
someone to use this information to determine how the application should
behave, for someone
If Ubuntu wants to take any market share in enterprise, such sudden
changes cannot happen. I was using NetowrkManager's vpnc plugin for a
while, and it's crucial for my work (I believe it's crucial for many
people). Please fix this or let us know how to help to get this issue
fixed!
--
No default
Ugh! I was connected to my university when I posted the last reply (5
minutes ago), and after posting it, I lost my regular internet
connection =-( I disconnected from my university's VPN, and had a
connection again, then, reconnected to the VPN, and now still have a
connection; it's very inconsi
Go figure . . . I've only been a member of the Linux community (Kubuntu)
since August, and for about 2 months, I used KVpnc to connect to my
university's VPN; then, after using the Gutsy beta for probably a week,
this bug happened. It was completely random and seemingly without
cause, as I hadn't
Thanks! Finally this bug which I have been beating my breast about since
Feisty days is getting attention. How did that happen?
Thanks anyway! Now please take action and close this bug. I want to start
using VPN from network manager on my Ubuntu laptop.
-Balaji
On Dec 2, 2007 9:25 AM, Emmet Hiko
Thanks for testing with a Cisco concetrator that supplies a default
route. If that's not being applied, it's definitely a bug. Setting
Confirmed.
** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: New => Confirmed
--
No default internet traffic after connecting to V
We run a Cisco VPN which pulls it's configuration over DHCP, including a
default route. Gutsy's NM/vpnc does not apply this route. This feature
of the Cisco VPN works just fine in other places: the official client
for Windows, for Mac, and for Linux, the command-line /usr/sbin/vpnc
executable, and
I am also affected by this bug. While I agree with Johan that allowing
the client a direct route to the internet while the tunnel is active is
a Bad Thing, that is ultimately the decision of the network architect,
not the client. I believe that the client should route whatever networks
are advertis
After reading again and just have followed a forum link in Ubuntu Forums
i saw i maybe have chosen the wrong bug to comment. Sorry !
--
No default internet traffic after connecting to VPN
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124663
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
With that change in the pptp plugin i'm not able to use either the vpn tunnel
at my workingplace, neither the Internet Connection my University provides via
WLAN. So the plugin became useless for me since using gutsy. I think that is a
major backdraw for the usabilty of my system.
I know many ot
Providing easy to use but insecure defaults is to a large extent what
got Microsoft into their security mess. I believe this issue is best
resolved by either asking your organization to route traffic between
their vpn endpoint and the internet, or using the network-manager vpn
configuration dialog
Exactly my point Oliver. This is why I am requesting that this bug be taken
seriously. It is one of the reasons why I contemplated going back to
Windows. The Windows Cisco client has a simpler interface, and with just one
option, one could either have the normal internet traffic continued or shut
o
That is not the default behaviour in the Windows Cisco client, surely?
I use the Windows client all the time and my internet routing is unaffected.
Are we suggesting that he should disconnect from VPN just to use google?
Or that his company should provide web access, and then send it through the
Personally, I don't believe the behaviour should be changed. The
default is the same for Windows and Linux with the Cisco client, and is
more secure than allowing dual-homed access. If you're sufficiently
sure that you are not compromising your VPN provider by doing so,
there's no reason you can'
But that doesn't make my work easier. Can you please add this feature in
vpnc and help me please.
I found on this webpage http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/vpnc-howto.xml that it
is a problem of DNS Masquerading. Although it doesn't work for me (possibly
because Gentoo is different from Ubuntu), is the
This is the default behaviour for the commercial cisco client as well.
The reason it is configured in this manner is to prevent external
attackers using a (typically poorly secured) external workstation with
VPN access to access internal resources. Cisco has a feature in their
newer concentrators
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not
show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor
directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any
other bugs you ma
44 matches
Mail list logo
