Am Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:42:10 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> just in case you did not notice yet: U-Boot v2009.11-rc1 was released
> last night.
Hi,
I just tested it on my Dbox2 board where U-Boot 2009.08 is working
perfectly well with unchanged config.
But now U-Boot raises an exception during
Thank you, Jocke
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:41:08 +0100
>
>
> >
> > Hi, All
> >
> >
> >
> > Each time JFFS2 initi
In some cases, we need low speed master clock. So depending on the
"mdiv" variable, the processor clock is divided by 2 (default) or 4.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
---
PS: Tom, are you still temporary at91 custodian?
board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 24
include/configs
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> Thank you, Jocke
>
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> > To: leon...@msn.com
> > CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:41:08 +0100
> >
> >
> > >
Cleans up the s3c24x0 header files:
s4c24x0.h: removes the use of 'volatile' from the S3C24X0_REG8,
S3C24X0_REG16 and S3C24X0_REG32 register typedef's. Registers are always
accessed using the IO accessor functions which cast the register address
as 'volatile' anyway so it isn't required here.
s
Ok, thank you, jocke.
Can you tell me how much time can be saved according to your idea, by your
experience?
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Da
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
>
> Thank you, Jocke
>
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> > To: leon...@msn.com
> > CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:41:08 +0100
> >
> >
> >
Jocke, you are so kind.Thank you very much:)
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:20:19 +0100
>
> HeLei wrote on 03/11/20
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 10:21:13:
>
> Ok, thank you, jocke.
> Can you tell me how much time can be saved according to your idea, by your
> experience?
Can't remember any figures, but is was lots by not scanning empty space. It all
depends on how full your fs is.
Jocke
_
Hi rhabarber1848,
> I just tested it on my Dbox2 board where U-Boot 2009.08 is working
> perfectly well with unchanged config.
> But now U-Boot raises an exception during machine check:
>
> =
> U-Boot 2009.11 (Tuxbox) (No
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 10:26:44:
> Jocke, you are so kind.
> Thank you very much:)
NP, it was easy considering I did the first impl. for linux :)
It is probably easier to paste the missing bits into the current crc32 impl.
though.
Jocke
___
U-B
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:29:47 +0100
>
> HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 10:21:13:
> >
> > Ok, thank you, jocke.
>
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> > - Don't scan more than you have to, that is, ls/read /some/file
> > should only scan and keep records to do the ls/read of that
> > particular file.
>So we have to have an index, or something like that, to tell which file in
> which EBs. This index is al
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 10:39:48:
>
>
> > Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> > To: leon...@msn.com
> > CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:29:47 +0100
> >
> > HeLei wrote on 03/11/
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:46 +0100
>
> HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> > > - Don't scan more than yo
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:52:06 +0100
>
> HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 10:39:48:
> >
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [U-B
Hi,
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you
> plan to submit this support here sometime?
the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree
in our public CVS.
After unpacking U-Boo
Dear Hui Tang
2009/11/3 Hui Tang :
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> 2009/11/1 Wolfgang Denk :
>> Dear "Hui.Tang",
>>
>> In message
>> <6c7a9a5dcafb1f535ed33cb29d579db993846325.1256898456.git.zetal...@gmail.com>
>> you wrote:
>>> Add gec2410_config option for GEC2410
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hui.Tang
>>> ---
This patch implements write support to usb device with raw partition.
It will be useful for filesystem write support to usb device from
u-boot in future.
Tested with writing kernel image to raw usb disk & booting with usb
read command into ram.
[Note: run usb part to get info about start sector
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Apart from that, I'd strongly start looking for implications of the
> recent rewrite of the relocation strategy to code not in mainline.
Hi,
with great relieve I can say the removing "*(.fixup)" from the *.lds
files solved the problem:
Hi rhabarber1848,
>> Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you
>> plan to submit this support here sometime?
>
> the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree
> in our public CVS.
So why not move mainline? Usually it's pretty fun to get o
Dear Kevin Morfitt
2009/11/3 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
:
> Cleans up the s3c24x0 header files:
Thank you for patch
>
> s4c24x0.h: removes the use of 'volatile' from the S3C24X0_REG8,
> S3C24X0_REG16 and S3C24X0_REG32 register typedef's. Registers are always
> accessed using the IO ac
>
> HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> >
> > Thank you, Jocke
> > > - impl. a better crc32(use the one from linux)
>
> Attaching a very crude port of linux crc32. This boots a linux img
> for me and handles the environment crc as well. Feel free
> to clean it up and submit to u-boot.
>
>
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:47:08 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
>> After unpacking U-Boot 2009.08 these files are copied into the source
>> tree: http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/boot/u-boot-tuxbox/
>
> Ah uh, I would even offer some help in the process (like adding a branch
> in the u-boot-testing reposit
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> CC: leon...@msn.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:55:18 +0100
>
> >
> > HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> > >
> > > Thank you, Jocke
>
Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Kevin Morfitt
>
> 2009/11/3 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
> :
>> Cleans up the s3c24x0 header files:
>
> Thank you for patch
>
>> s4c24x0.h: removes the use of 'volatile' from the S3C24X0_REG8,
>> S3C24X0_REG16 and S3C24X0_REG32 register typedef's. Registers a
HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 12:08:39:
>
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> > CC: leon...@msn.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:55:18 +0100
> >
> > >
> > > HeLei wrote on 03/11/2
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] Does uboot EBS(erase block summary) to reduce JFFS2
> scaning time?
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> From: joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:13:11 +0100
>
> HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 12:08:39:
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot]
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Swarthout
> Edward L-SWARTHOU
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:36 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl_pci_init_port end-point
> initialization
Dear Minkyu,
> I think, It is better to put bottom of s3c24x0 board series. (next to VCMA9)
OK, I will fix it and re-send the patch.
Thanks.
BR.
Hui.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Wolfgang ,
I have noticed that the same error as described here
(http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/061913.html)
happens when compiling the latest version of U-boot (v2009-11-rc1)
using arm-cortex_a8-linux-gnueabi gcc version 4.4.0
(crosstool-ng-hg_defa...@1620_187e06178dcb).
C
From: Alessandro Rubini
The timer decrements and READ_TIMER() negates the value read.
Writing 0 in reset_timer() is this wrong, as a readback before 400us
will read back 0 and will report 1780 seconds, so nand operations did
timeout. This patch writes ~0 in reset_timer to prevent this.
Signed-o
Dear Wolfgang,
>> - printf("s3c2410_nand_correct_data: not implemented\n");
>> + debugX(1, "s3c2410_nand_correct_data: not implemented\n");
>
> I think this should remain a printf().
Since when booting from nand flash, the printf() is not available in
the early stage, here I replace print
Dear Hui Tang,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>
> > An ARM920 board does not belong into the arm926ejs block.
...
> Would you please give me some advice where should I put the gec2410
> board config?
Sorry, I was wrong here. Please ignore this comment.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Softw
Dear rhabarber1848,
In message you wrote:
>
> I just tested it on my Dbox2 board where U-Boot 2009.08 is working
> perfectly well with unchanged config.
> But now U-Boot raises an exception during machine check:
>
> =
>
Dear Minkyu Kang,
In message <1f3430fb0911030227t2c204fd6s52a0685628748...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Would you please give me some advice where should I put the gec2410
> > board config?
>
> I think, It is better to put bottom of s3c24x0 board series. (next to VCMA9)
This is definitely w
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
> >
> > HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> > >
> > > Thank you, Jocke
>
> > > > - impl. a better crc32(use the one from linux)
> >
> > Attaching a very crude port of linux crc32. This boots a linux img
> > for me and handles the environment crc
Dear Roman Zeyde,
In message <6d23e4ef0911030355j47a653a0iea7b6cae2f3cb...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> I have noticed that the same error as described here
> (http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/061913.html)
> happens when compiling the latest version of U-boot (v2009-11-rc1)
>
Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20091103121250.ga8...@mail.gnudd.com> you wrote:
> From: Alessandro Rubini
>
> The timer decrements and READ_TIMER() negates the value read.
> Writing 0 in reset_timer() is this wrong, as a readback before 400us
> will read back 0 and will report 1780 seconds,
Dear Hui Tang,
In message you
wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> >> - printf("s3c2410_nand_correct_data: not implemented\n");
> >> + debugX(1, "s3c2410_nand_correct_data: not implemented\n");
> >
> > I think this should remain a printf().
>
> Since when booting from nand flash, the printf() is not av
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 03/11/2009 14:21:08:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message 003bf...@transmode.se> you wrote:
> > >
> > > HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you, Jocke
> >
> > > > > - impl. a better crc32(use the one from linux)
> > >
> > > Attaching a very crude
This error only appears when DEBUG is enabled in this driver. That's why
it went unnoticed till now.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
---
cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c
index 397
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Roman Zeyde,
>
> In message <6d23e4ef0911030355j47a653a0iea7b6cae2f3cb...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> I have noticed that the same error as described here
>> (http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/061913.html)
>> happens when compiling the latest versi
HeLei wrote:
> Hi, all
>
>
>
> If I wish to support uImage in jffs2 FS in NAND flash, how many size will
> be used for JFFS2 FS itself, such as wearing level, GC, JFFS2 INODE header?
what you mean about uImage? is that kernel?
>
>
>
> For example, NAND fash size is 32M and uImage is
> Um... why is READ_TIMER doing such a stupid thing as negating values?
Because the counter counts down. I could have returns "0 - value" or
"~value". Since I chose the latter initially, this fix keeps the same
approach. I can't return the value I read, since it goes backwards.
/alessandro
Ported over the more efficient linux crc32() function.
A quick comparsion on ppc:
After changing the old crc32 to do 4 bytes in the
inner loop to be able to compare with new version one can note:
- old inner loop has 61 insn, new has 19 insn.
- new crc32 does one 32 bit load of data to crc while
Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20091103152354.ga12...@mail.gnudd.com> you wrote:
> > Um... why is READ_TIMER doing such a stupid thing as negating values?
>
> Because the counter counts down. I could have returns "0 - value" or
> "~value". Since I chose the latter initially, this fix keeps
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 03/11/2009 14:21:08:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message 003bf...@transmode.se> you wrote:
> > >
> > > HeLei wrote on 03/11/2009 09:21:04:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you, Jocke
> >
> > > > > - impl. a better crc32(use the one from linux)
> > >
> > > Attaching a very crude
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message <1257263550-21504-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se>
you wrote:
> Ported over the more efficient linux crc32() function.
> A quick comparsion on ppc:
> After changing the old crc32 to do 4 bytes in the
> inner loop to be able to compare with new vers
> Well, to me READ_TIMER() sounds like a function/macro to read some
> value from some timer; if that timer counts doen, then successive
> calls to that macro/function would return decreasing values. Counting
> up or down is a property of the specific timer and should be handled
> elsewhere; such p
u-boot 2009.08
Hello,
we urgently need some help.
WE NEED TO RUN THE WHOLE THING FROM SD!
We made the u-boot working with the SD (mci1) on the at91SAM7S9263B-EK
board.
Status:
boot.bin (At91Bootstrap 3.0) starts from SD
boot.bin (2009.08) loads u-boot form SD and starts it
u-boot loads the u
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
net/Makefile | 12 ++--
net/bootp.c |4
net/eth.c|7 +++
net/net.c|4
net/nfs.c|4
net/rarp.c |4
net/tftp.c |4
7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/Ma
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
common/cmd_bootm.c | 34 --
include/asm-m68k/config.h |2 ++
include/asm-ppc/config.h |2 ++
include/asm-sparc/config.h |2 ++
include/image.h|2 +-
include/lmb.h |4
l
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
common/Makefile |2 +-
common/cmd_nand.c |4
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile
index 3781738..b8c596c 100644
--- a/common/Makefile
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONF
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
common/cmd_bootm.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c
index 22aa7f8..a4b2e26 100644
--- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
+++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int do_bootelf (cmd_tbl_t *cmd
---
include/spi_flash.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/spi_flash.h b/include/spi_flash.h
index de4f174..1f8ba29 100644
--- a/include/spi_flash.h
+++ b/include/spi_flash.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#define _SPI_FLASH_H_
#include
+#include
struct sp
sorry Scott, didnt mean to direct this to you. meant to send the nand one
only to you.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> ---
> common/Makefile |2 +-
> common/cmd_nand.c |4
> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile
> index 3781738..b8c596c 100644
> --- a/common/Makefile
> +++ b/common
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 03/11/2009 17:02:27:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message <1257263550-21504-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se>
> you wrote:
> > Ported over the more efficient linux crc32() function.
> > A quick comparsion on ppc:
> > After changing the old crc32 to do 4 b
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R
>> +void reset_phy(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACB
>> + /*
>> + * Initialize ethernet HW addr prior to starting Linux,
>> + * needed for nfsroot
>> + */
>> + eth_init(gd->bd);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>
> NAK. Please fix your Linux drivers instead. Se
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 16:12:40 Paul Thomas wrote:
> From: Paul Thomas
looks like you need to fix your git environment & re-submit this patch
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot
In SGMII mode the link between a processor's internal TBI PHY and an
external PHY should always be 1000Mbps, full duplex. Also, the SGMII
interface between an internal TBI PHY and external PHY does not
support in-band auto-negotation.
Previously, when configured for SGMII mode a TBI PHY would att
Hi all,
I wish to configure my BDI3000 to boot from NAND flash on the mx31 platform.
I do not want the BDI to do the low level init including
processor/clock/SDRAM setup etc. Instead, i want my U-boot do it when "reset
halt/run" is executed. What do i need to put in the BDI config in order to
do
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 03/11/2009 20:40:50:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message <1257180242-1299-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se>
> you wrote:
> > This series removes the needs to access the GOT in
> > IRQ handlers, then switches GOT PTR in start.S asm to
> > use r12 instead
Signed-off-by: Terry Lv
---
drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 57 -
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
index b69ce15..dcc9548 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
@@ -88,7
As discussed earlier today
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-November/063711.html
This is the patch to conditionally compile the ARM board LED
functions.
It was regression tested with MAKEALL arm using the
Code Sourcery 2009 compiler and my roll-your-own gcc-4.4.2
Both patches were r
From: Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye
This patch fix build error with gcc-4.4.2 about inline function
declared weak, see below:
board.c:96: error: inline function 'coloured_LED_init' cannot be declared weak
board.c:98: error: inline function 'red_LED_on' cannot be declared weak
board.c:100: error: inline
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 16:26:17 Paul Thomas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 November 2009 16:12:40 Paul Thomas wrote:
> >> From: Paul Thomas
> >
> > looks like you need to fix your git environment & re-submit this patch
>
> Yeah, I saw it doe
The ARM board LED functions are defined as weak.
They add a size overhead if they are not used.
Now they are only defined if CONFIG_STATUS_LED is also defined.
The arm920t and arm926ejs _start function calls these LED functions
bl coloured_LED_init
bl red_LED_on
In gen
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:36:58 Terry Lv wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Terry Lv
your subject has a spelling typo, and generally you should avoid using
complete sentences in it (i.e. drop the period).
> --- a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ mmc_bwrite(int dev_num,
From: Paul Thomas
---
Makefile |3 +
board/linuxstamp/at91sam9260ls/Makefile| 56 ++
board/linuxstamp/at91sam9260ls/at91sam9260ls.c | 203 +
board/linuxstamp/at91sam9260ls/config.mk |1 +
board/linuxstamp/at91
Hi Mike,
Thanks~~
I will send another patch.
Yours
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: 2009年11月4日 10:56
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Lv Terry-R65388
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Improve read performance of ger
Hi,
I am trying to define multiple partitions using mtdparts variable. But I
can't get it set automatically right.
I defined the set_bootargs as the following:
set_bootargs=setenv bootargs root=/dev/mtdblock2 rootfs=cramfs,jffs2
mtdparts=ph
ysmap-flash.0:256k(u-boot),256k(u-boot-env),7936k(root1
Our AMERICAN Medical Doctor list has full contact data for all states.
Coverage for These specialties and more:
allergy/immunology
anesthesiology
cardiology
dermatology
emergency_medicine
endocrinology_diabetes metabolism
family_practice
gastroenterology
general_practice
geriatrics
infectious_
David Hawkins wrote:
> Hi Mit Matelske,
>
>> I believe I made the changes to our FPGA that the eval's CPLD did when
>> the FCFG gets switched to 1 (bringing up flash enable at reset).
>> Since we have a smaller flash, I am putting the u-boot.bin at
>> 0xFFE0 (0xFFF0 for the original Freesc
I am working on a board based on the MPC8349E-MDS eval board from
Freescale. One of the few differences is that it has an Atmel flash
part on it (AT49BV642DT 4Mx16) and a Xilinx FPGA. I have the old
u-boot-1.1.3 that came with the eval board running both on the eval
board and our "new" board, how
In drivers/mmc/mmc.c, mmc_bread will do aligned read.
So we don't need to use single block read.
We can use multiblock read to improve the performance.
Signed-off-by: Terry Lv
---
drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 51 ---
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message <1257180242-1299-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> you
wrote:
> This series removes the needs to access the GOT in
> IRQ handlers, then switches GOT PTR in start.S asm to
> use r12 instead of r14. This leads up to the removal of
> -ffixed-r14 gcc op
Hi Mit Matelske,
> I believe I made the changes to our FPGA that the eval's CPLD did when
> the FCFG gets switched to 1 (bringing up flash enable at reset).
> Since we have a smaller flash, I am putting the u-boot.bin at
> 0xFFE0 (0xFFF0 for the original Freescale u-boot), the base
> addre
Dear thomas.schu...@saf-kassel.de,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> we urgently need some help.
Read http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html and/or hire an
expert.
> WE NEED TO RUN THE WHOLE THING FROM SD!
No need to shout.
> u-boot loads the uImage (linux-2.6.27)from SD to 0x2200
>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 November 2009 16:12:40 Paul Thomas wrote:
>> From: Paul Thomas
>
> looks like you need to fix your git environment & re-submit this patch
> -mike
>
Mike,
Yeah, I saw it does that in git send-email, but the first prompt "Who
s
Dear Paul Thomas,
please check/fix your mail addresses.
In message <1257282760-18005-1-git-send-email-pthomas8...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> From: Paul Thomas
Signed-off-by: line is missing.
> ---
> Makefile |3 +
> board/linuxstamp/at91sam9260ls/Makefil
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:18:22 +0800
> From: xiangf...@gmail.com
> To: leon...@msn.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] jffs2 FS flash occupation
>
> HeLei wrote:
> > Hi, all
> >
> >
> >
> > If I wish to support uImage in jffs2 FS in NAND flash, how many size will
> >
You have been invited to the most advanced business trade portal
WorkKingdom Is A New Revolutionary System For Business Professionals
World Wide. Benefit From Increased Revenues, Profits From Having
Customers, Suppliers Contact You For Networking/trade Possibilities.
Its A Totally 100 Percent
This patch adds support for Flex-OneNAND devices.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Hagargundgi
Signed-off-by: Amul Kumar Saha
---
drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c | 740 +++-
drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c | 14
drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_uboot.c |4
include/
Define and use CONFIG_ENV_ADDR_FLEX and CONFIG_ENV_SIZE_FLEX
for storing environment variables.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Hagargundgi
Signed-off-by: Amul Kumar Saha
---
common/env_onenand.c | 10 ++
include/configs/apollon.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/c
Add command for changing Flex-OneNAND SLC / MLC boundary.
Also onenand commands work for Flex-OneNAND.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Hagargundgi
Signed-off-by: Amul Kumar Saha
---
common/cmd_onenand.c | 90 +-
include/configs/apollon.h |2 -
2 files
Hi Scott,
>
> You seem to have stripped a copyright notice that was added in the Linux
> version of patch 1/3.
>
Updated in the current patch.
Regards,
Amul Kumar Saha
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinf
Hi Scott,
>> +static loff_t flexonenand_addr(struct onenand_chip *this, int block)
>> +{
>> + loff_t ofs = 0;
>> + int die = 0, boundary;
>> +
>> + if (ONENAND_IS_DDP(this) && block >= this->density_mask) {
>> + block -= this->density_mask;
>> + die = 1;
>> + ofs = this->diesize[0];
>> + }
>> +
>>
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
lib_ppc/Makefile |2 +-
lib_ppc/kgdb.c |5 -
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib_ppc/Makefile b/lib_ppc/Makefile
index 452107c..68b70b0 100644
--- a/lib_ppc/Makefile
+++ b/lib_ppc/Makefile
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ COBJS-y
Hi,
Please clarify the following regarding u-boot.
Will u-boot imx27 Target board, if yes pl send me this link for down loading
u-boot
Regards,
Venkatesulu
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
This adds CONFIG_AT91_ALT_EPINS to avoid using board configs in
at91sam9260_devices.c.
In adding this config at91sam9260ek.h afeb9260.h were changed, this should
probabbly be tested for those 2 boards.
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Intur Venkatesulu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please clarify the following regarding u-boot.
>
>
>
> Will u-boot imx27 Target board, if yes pl send me this link for down loading
> u-boot
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Venkatesulu
Venkatesulu,
There is support for the imx27 in u-b
Dear Kevin Morfitt,
2009/11/3 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
:
> This patch moves the s3c24x0 header files from include/ to
> include/asm-arm/arch-s3c24x0/.
>
> checkpatch.pl showed 2 errors and 3 warnings. The 2 errors were both due
> to a non-UTF8 character in David M?ller's name:
>
> ERR
Am Mittwoch 04 November 2009 01:34:53 schrieb myub...@fastmail.fm:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to define multiple partitions using mtdparts variable. But I
> can't get it set automatically right.
>
> I defined the set_bootargs as the following:
> set_bootargs=setenv bootargs root=/dev/mtdblock2 rootfs
r14 is no longer used as non volatile GOT ptr. Instead
the volatile r12 is used so be sure to do GET_GOT in
asm code when you need to access global data.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
README |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index 7
commit 70ed869e broke fsl pcie end-point initialization.
Returning 0 is not correct. The function must return the first free
bus number for the next controller.
fsl_pci_init() must still be called and a bus allocated even if the
controller is an end-point.
Signed-off-by: Ed Swarthout
Acked-by:
97 matches
Mail list logo
