Hi, Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you > plan to submit this support here sometime? the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree in our public CVS. After unpacking U-Boot 2009.08 these files are copied into the source tree: http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/boot/u-boot-tuxbox/ Then this patch is applied http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/cdk/Patches/u-boot-2009.08.diff?view=markup This is the board config used: http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/cdk/config/u-boot.dbox2.h.m4?view=markup I do not know if the code meets U-Boot coding standards, but it works ;) Adding the code to the U-Boot tree makes sense but I think I do not have the needed skills to support it in the future. > Apart from that, I'd strongly start looking for implications of the > recent rewrite of the relocation strategy to code not in mainline. Ah, this is the message I was waiting for. After 2009.08 I did not follow the coding process due to lack of time so I am sure I missed something. Do you mean "[TESTING PATCH] ppc: Relocation test patch" from Sep 12th? Btw, I am using gcc-3.4.6. > Apart from that you could also use the information in our DULG[1] for > debugging of U-Boot after relocation and use gdb I´ll try this as well. Cheers, rhabarber1848 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
