Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:25 Wed 01 Apr , Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > > From what I remember we all agreed to move the device drivers (e.g. > > ethernet, > > NAND, USB, serial etc) from the architecture/board (cpu/... board/...) to > > the > > drivers directories at some time. > > > > Speaking for PP

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <20090331192117.gf24...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > >  drivers/usb/Makefile                        >       |    1 + > > > >  .../at91/usb.c => drivers/usb/atmel_usb.c          |  >  0 > > > >  rename cpu/arm926ejs/at91/usb.c => d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Stefan, > From what I remember we all agreed to move the device drivers (e.g. ethernet, > NAND, USB, serial etc) from the architecture/board (cpu/... board/...) to the > drivers directories at some time. > > Speaking for PPC4xx, the 4xx ethernet driver has recently been moved from > cpu/ppc4

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Jean-Christophe, >> And that is exactly the issue here. The discussion is about moving >> 'platform USB init code' to generic driver code. >> I would have no problems with moving real USB drivers to the generic >> driver section, if they are cleaned from board specific code, of >> course. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:57 Wed 01 Apr , Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hello Jean-Christophe, > > >> And that is exactly the issue here. The discussion is about moving > >> 'platform USB init code' to generic driver code. > >> I would have no problems with moving real USB drivers to the generic > >> driver section, if th

[U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at the same time?

2009-04-01 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Hi, AFAIK, while running from flash, u-boot uses (part of) d-cache on some platforms for the C stack. I think, it's on MPC83xx and MPC85xx? Does anybody know, if I can use the remaining part of the d-cache as normal d-cache, e.g. to generate bursts on the SDRAM interface while testing the RAM? K

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:57 Wed 01 Apr , Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hello Jean-Christophe, > > >> And that is exactly the issue here. The discussion is about moving > >> 'platform USB init code' to generic driver code. > >> I would have no problems with moving real USB drivers to the generic > >> driver section, if th

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Marco
I agree with Liu Dave. I sent a patch two times about a new tools command called imls, but I didn't receive back the patch (neither the first nor the second time) as list subscriber so I'm not sure that the patch has been received. Wolfgang, can you confirm to me that the patch has been received? I

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Markus Rathgeb
Mar 28: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add imls utility command‎ - … new command called imls. It's goal is the same of UBoot's imls but it has to be used as … Mar 30: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add imls utility command‎ - … new command called imls. Its goal is the same of UBoot imls but it can be used as Linux shell …

[U-Boot] bss section initialization on s3c44b0

2009-04-01 Thread Ming-Dien Chang
I had a problem of unreasonable value of variable 'top_pad' which should be zero. After reading .../cpu/s3c44b0/start.S, it seems that .bss section is not been initialized to zero. Every thing goes fine after patching the .bss initialization. Is it a bug ? Or I missed something ? Best regards, Mo

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Digest, Vol 11, Issue 3

2009-04-01 Thread Zheng.Wang
Hello, I am a new uboot. I want to ask about if there is patch for Realview Platform Based ARM11 MPCORE board, or if there is any similiar boards or patches. Yesterday I tried a patch called Realview EB Board and cannot detect DRAM and Flash when testing. BR, George _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090401080151.gb23...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > Actually the best place is the drivers/usb/ I agree with Remy: "We should not pollute one area by cleaning another area." Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

[U-Boot] Inquiring about Uboot patch on Realview PB ARM11Mpcore

2009-04-01 Thread Zheng.Wang
Hello, I am a new uboot. I want to ask about if there is patch for Realview Platform Based ARM11 MPCORE board, or if there is any similiar boards or patches. Yesterday I tried a patch called Realview EB Board and cannot detect DRAM and Flash when testing. BR, Zheng __

Re: [U-Boot] bss section initialization on s3c44b0

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ming-Dien Chang, In message <714db0904010157n29d03f2bu8c8224844add5...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I had a problem of unreasonable value of variable 'top_pad' which should be > zero. > After reading .../cpu/s3c44b0/start.S, it seems that .bss section is not > been initialized > to zero. Ev

Re: [U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at the same time?

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jens Gehrlein, In message <49d323e5.9080...@tqs.de> you wrote: > > AFAIK, while running from flash, u-boot uses (part of) d-cache on some > platforms for the C stack. I think, it's on MPC83xx and MPC85xx? > > Does anybody know, if I can use the remaining part of the d-cache > as normal d-ca

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marco, In message <49d32ab2.10...@gmail.com> you wrote: > I agree with Liu Dave. I sent a patch two times about a new tools > command called imls, but I didn't receive back the patch (neither the > first nor the second time) as list subscriber so I'm not sure that the > patch has been receive

Re: [U-Boot] Inquiring about Uboot patch on Realview PB ARM11Mpcore

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:13 Wed 01 Apr , zheng.w...@infineon.com wrote: > Hello, I am a new uboot. > > I want to ask about if there is patch for Realview Platform Based ARM11 > MPCORE board, or if there is any similiar boards or patches. > > Yesterday I tried a patch called Realview EB Board and cannot detect

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:57 Wed 01 Apr , Remy Bohmer wrote: > >> Hello Jean-Christophe, >> >> And that is exactly the issue here. The discussion is about moving 'platform USB init code' to generic driver code. I would have no problems with movi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3: mmc: mmc2 support

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 14:07 Sat 28 Mar , Minkyu Kang wrote: > There are 3 MMC/SD/SDIO host controllers inside the device. > This patch will support mmc2 and mmc3(mmc3 have not tested) > > Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang > --- > drivers/mmc/omap3_mmc.c | 74 > - > inc

Re: [U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at thesame time?

2009-04-01 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Liu Dave-R63238 schrieb: >>> AFAIK, while running from flash, u-boot uses (part of) >> d-cache on some >>> platforms for the C stack. I think, it's on MPC83xx and MPC85xx? >>> >>> Does anybody know, if I can use the remaining part of the d-cache >>> as normal d-cache, e.g. to generate bursts on th

Re: [U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at the same time?

2009-04-01 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Dear Jens Gehrlein, > > In message <49d323e5.9080...@tqs.de> you wrote: >> AFAIK, while running from flash, u-boot uses (part of) d-cache on some >> platforms for the C stack. I think, it's on MPC83xx and MPC85xx? >> >> Does anybody know, if I can use

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Marco
Thank you very much for information Wolfgang. However I don't understand why I didn't receive my post on the mailing list, I'm afraid that even other people didn't receive it and then I don't receive any comments. I checked the option "Receive your own posts to the list" on my setting and it sets t

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Liu Dave-R63238
> Thank you very much for information Wolfgang. However I don't > understand > why I didn't receive my post on the mailing list, I'm afraid that even > other people didn't receive it and then I don't receive any > comments. I checked the option "Receive your own posts to the list" on my setting >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:27 Wed 01 Apr , Stefan Roese wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > It is just a glue code in linux. Maybe it will be simple if you create a > > core direcory > > and a host directory under the usb. An move the specific part in the host. > > Yes, I like this id

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Marco
Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is however that everybody can read it. Liu Dave-R63238 ha scritto: >> Thank you very much for information Wolfgang. However I don't >> understand >> why I di

Re: [U-Boot] RAM Probing for ads5121rev4

2009-04-01 Thread m marx
Hello Michele De Candia Besides using a CPLD register - I thought perhaps this would be a great application for using one of the 256 user programmable fuses. Unfortunately -- this ads5121 rev has this feature disabled for now. John Rigby will be re-submitting those 2 patches along with a slew o

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote: > Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list > that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is > however that everybody can read it. ive received both of the imls util e-mails in question. as for

Re: [U-Boot] UBIFS - Reading superblock error

2009-04-01 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Marcelo, On Tuesday 31 March 2009, DATACOM - Mallmann wrote: > I'm trying to use UBI and UBIFS over a nand device. I want to create a > mtd partition in u-boot (with ubi part command), save a ubifs image > (with mkfs.ubifs), mount and load it with ubifs commands. The easiest way to write an UB

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > It is just a glue code in linux. Maybe it will be simple if you create a > core direcory > and a host directory under the usb. An move the specific part in the host. Yes, I like this idea. This gets us closer to the Linux directory structure.

[U-Boot] u-boot depends on toolchain

2009-04-01 Thread Stevan Ignjatovic
When I cross-compile u-boot prepared for my custom made board with mpc885 (CROSS_COMPILE=ppc_8xx-) using the toolchain found in eldk 4.2 (gcc version 4.2.2) u-boot doesn't boot because of an exception: U-Boot 2009.03 (Apr 01 2009 - 10:27:03) CPU: MPC885ZPnn at 66 MHz [66.0...133.0 MHz] 8

Re: [U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at thesame time?

2009-04-01 Thread Liu Dave-R63238
> > AFAIK, while running from flash, u-boot uses (part of) > d-cache on some > > platforms for the C stack. I think, it's on MPC83xx and MPC85xx? > > > > Does anybody know, if I can use the remaining part of the d-cache > > as normal d-cache, e.g. to generate bursts on the SDRAM interface > > whi

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote: >> Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list >> that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is >> however that everybody can read it. > > ive received both of the imls uti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 11:27 Wed 01 Apr , Stefan Roese wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > > It is just a glue code in linux. Maybe it will be simple if you create > > > a core direcory > > > and a host directory

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

2009-04-01 Thread Marco
Yeah, maybe you're right the fault is of gmail. Jerry Van Baren ha scritto: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote: >>> Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list >>> that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thin

[U-Boot] Problem booting image + device tree (MPC5200B)

2009-04-01 Thread Nandini Hengen
Dear listers, I currently have a problem with the device tree - the kernel hangs after unpacking and trying to load the device tree. Distribution: OpenSuse 11.1, IA-64 Kernel 2.6.29 ARCH = ppc CROSS_COMPILE = powerpc-603e-gnu-gcc Hardware-Revision: Phytec MPC5200B-tiny Re

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot depends on toolchain

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stevan Ignjatovic, In message <1238580375.15731.11.ca...@stevan> you wrote: > When I cross-compile u-boot prepared for my custom made board with > mpc885 (CROSS_COMPILE=ppc_8xx-) using the toolchain found in eldk 4.2 > (gcc version 4.2.2) u-boot doesn't boot because of an exception: ... > How

Re: [U-Boot] Problem booting image + device tree (MPC5200B)

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Nandini Hengen", In message you wrote: > > I currently have a problem with the device tree - the > kernel hangs after unpacking and trying to load the device tree. ... > U-Boot Version 1.2 incl. downloaded patches ... > combination with U-Boot 1.1.4). I also found a thre

Re: [U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at thesame time?

2009-04-01 Thread Peter Tyser
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 17:29 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote: > > > AFAIK, while running from flash, u-boot uses (part of) > > d-cache on some > > > platforms for the C stack. I think, it's on MPC83xx and MPC85xx? > > > > > > Does anybody know, if I can use the remaining part of the d-cache > > > as

Re: [U-Boot] Problem booting image + device tree (MPC5200B)

2009-04-01 Thread Nandini Hengen
Hello, I have also downloaded U-Boot version u-boot-2009.3 Are any additional patches for the MPC5200b-tiny necessary? In case of U-Boot 1.2 I had u-boot-1.2.0.tar.bz2 and u-boot-1.2.0.mpc5200b-tiny-2.tar.gz which added a patches directory to my main directory. A few corrections to my

Re: [U-Boot] ppc: using d-cache for C stack and as cache at thesame time?

2009-04-01 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Peter Tyser schrieb: > You should be able to use the 85xx DMA engine to generate the bursts too > (I'd assume the same for 83xx, but never tried it). See > cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c dma_*(). The default values of the satr0 and datr0 > don't allow the processor to snoop transactions, so you'd have to use

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread ksi
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > In message <20090331192117.gf24...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > >  drivers/usb/Makefile                        >       |    1 + > > > > >  .../at91/usb.c => drivers/usb/atmel_usb.c          |  >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper.

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Mar 31, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Match determine_mp_bootpg() that was added for 86xx. We need this to > address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to > make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so > other u-boot code doesn't use

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread ksi
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > > From what I remember we all agreed to move the device drivers (e.g. > ethernet, > > NAND, USB, serial etc) from the architecture/board (cpu/... board/...) > to the > > drivers directories at some time. > > > > Speaking for PPC4xx, the 4

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx/86xx: Ensure MP boot page is not used

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Mar 31, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > We had a bug on 86xx in which the boot page used to bring up secondary > cores was being overwritten and used for the malloc region in u-boot. > > We need to reserve the region of memory that the boot page is going to > be put at so nothing uses i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
>> diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h b/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h >> index 4329286..b06707f 100644 >> --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h >> +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h >> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ ulong get_spin_addr(void); >> void setup_mp(void); >> u32 get_my_id(void); >> void cpu_mp_lmb_reserve(struct lmb *lmb); >> +u32 determine_bootp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread ksi
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > It is just a glue code in linux. Maybe it will be simple if you create > a > > core direcory > > and a host directory under the usb. An move the specific part in the > host. > > Yes, I like this ide

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper.

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Becky Bruce wrote: >> @@ -203,13 +206,7 @@ void setup_mp(void) >> { >> extern ulong __secondary_start_page; >> ulong fixup = (ulong)&__secondary_start_page; >> -u32 bootpg; >> - >> -/* if we have 4G or more of memory, put the boot page at 4Gb-4k */ >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Michael Trimarchi
k...@koi8.net wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Stefan Roese wrote: On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message <20090331192117.gf24...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: drivers/usb/Makefile>|1 + .../at91/usb.c => drivers/usb/atmel_usb.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] 85xx/86xx: Ensure MP boot page is not used

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
We had a bug on 86xx in which the boot page used to bring up secondary cores was being overwritten and used for the malloc region in u-boot. We need to reserve the region of memory that the boot page is going to be put at so nothing uses it. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala Acked-by: Becky Bruce --- *

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] 85xx: Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper.

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
Match determine_mp_bootpg() that was added for 86xx. We need this to address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so other u-boot code doesn't use it. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- * fix up based on twea

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
* Use CONFIG_MP instead of CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match 85xx * Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper. We'll need this to address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so other u-boot code doesn't use it.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h b/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h >>> index 4329286..b06707f 100644 >>> --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h >>> +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.h >>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ ulong get_spin_addr(void); >>> void setup_mp(void); >>> u32 get_my_id(void); >>> void cpu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Mar 31, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > * Use CONFIG_MP instead of CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match 85xx > * Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper. We'll need this to > address a > bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make > sure > to reserve the region of memory

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> And we > should _NOT_ treat some drivers (e.g. SPI) as marginal. AT91RM9200 for > example can _NOT_ boot off of parallel flash because of silicon error so it > boots off of SPI DataFlash thus making SPI driver essential for the system. no the RM9200 can boot from NOR Flash I do it myself maybe no

Re: [U-Boot] Problem booting image + device tree (MPC5200B)

2009-04-01 Thread Marco
You could try to see if the kernel hangs but it prints something checking __log_buf. In this way you can try to understand the problem. Marco Nandini Hengen ha scritto: > Hello, > I have also downloaded U-Boot version u-boot-2009.3 Are any > additional patches for the MPC5200b-tiny nece

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:03 Wed 01 Apr , Michael Trimarchi wrote: > k...@koi8.net wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Stefan Roese wrote: >> >> >>> On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> In message <20090331192117.gf24...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: >>> drivers/usb/Makefile

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] drivers/usb: regorganisation

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- better description will be wrote for the final patch Best Regards, J. Makefile |4 +++- drivers/usb/{ => core}/Makefile | 22 +- drivers/usb/{ => core}/usb_ehci_core.c

Re: [U-Boot] New target : omap3_zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Dirk Behme
Hi Tom, Tom wrote: > Soon I will be submitting a set of patches to provide initial support > for the zoom2. > > Zoom2 is new target similar to the omap3_zoom1 target. > Here is a product link. > http://www.logicpd.com/products/development-kits/texas-instruments-zoom%E2%84%A2-omap34x-ii-mdp > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Fix timer handling to 1ms and CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000.

2009-04-01 Thread Dirk Behme
Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 11:19 Tue 17 Mar , Dirk Behme wrote: >> Fix OMAP3 timer handling to 1ms tick and CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000. >> Clean up macros and comments. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme >> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai >> --- >> >> Changes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Apr 1, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > * Use CONFIG_MP instead of CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match 85xx > * Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper. We'll need this to > address a > bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make > sure > to reserve the region of memory

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] 85xx: Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper.

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Apr 1, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Match determine_mp_bootpg() that was added for 86xx. We need this to > address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to > make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so > other u-boot code doesn't use i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-04-01 Thread Markus Rathgeb
An undocumented register? Are the specifications not released for the series <= r700? But I have to confess to never read the specifications of ATI/AMD. Have you found something? Are you able to try to build pcm030_config with a recent checkout? = make -C drivers/rtc/ make[1]: Enteri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] 85xx/86xx: Ensure MP boot page is not used

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <1238601989-6251-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > We had a bug on 86xx in which the boot page used to bring up secondary > cores was being overwritten and used for the malloc region in u-boot. > > We need to reserve the region of memory that th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <1238601989-6251-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > * Use CONFIG_MP instead of CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match 85xx > * Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper. We'll need this to address a > bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add initial support for Zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
Zoom2 is a new board from Texas Instruments and LogicPD This is the product description http://www.logicpd.com/products/development-kits/texas-instruments-zoom%E2%84%A2-omap34x-ii-mdp This patch provides a zoom2 base target by copying zoom1 and by making some obvious changes. This target compiles

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Mux changes to support zoom2 configuration.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h | 20 +++- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h b/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h index 3199fa9..47401f7 100644 --- a/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h +++ b/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add serial support.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
Zoom2 serial is in general supplied by one of the 4 UARTS on the debug board. The default serial is from the USB connector on left side of the debug board. The USB connector will produce 2 of the 4 UARTS. On your host pick the first enumeration. The serial port set up is the same with Zoom1. Baud

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add led support.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
This patch controls the large LED on the top left of the zoom2. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- board/omap3/zoom2/Makefile |4 ++- board/omap3/zoom2/led.c| 65 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 board/omap3/zoom

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add support for debug board detection.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
https://omapzoom.org/gf/project/omapzoom/wiki/?pagename=GettingStartedWithZoomII_AKA_OMAP34XII_MDP The zoom2 has an auxillary board that contains the serial, net, jtag and battery simulator. This change supports a runtime check if the debug board is connected. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- board/

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Mux changes to support zoom2 configuration.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h | 20 +++- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h b/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h index 3199fa9..47401f7 100644 --- a/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h +++ b/board/omap3/zoom2/zoom2.h @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add support for debug board detection.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
https://omapzoom.org/gf/project/omapzoom/wiki/?pagename=GettingStartedWithZoomII_AKA_OMAP34XII_MDP The zoom2 has an auxillary board that contains the serial, net, jtag and battery simulator. This change supports a runtime check if the debug board is connected. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- board/

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add led support.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
This patch controls the large LED on the top left of the zoom2. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- board/omap3/zoom2/Makefile |4 ++- board/omap3/zoom2/led.c| 65 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 board/omap3/zoom

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add serial support.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
Zoom2 serial is in general supplied by one of the 4 UARTS on the debug board. The default serial is from the USB connector on left side of the debug board. The USB connector will produce 2 of the 4 UARTS. On your host pick the first enumeration. The serial port set up is the same with Zoom1. Baud

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add initial support for Zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Rix
Zoom2 is a new board from Texas Instruments and LogicPD This is the product description http://www.logicpd.com/products/development-kits/texas-instruments-zoom%E2%84%A2-omap34x-ii-mdp This patch provides a zoom2 base target by copying zoom1 and by making some obvious changes. This target compiles

[U-Boot] New target : omap3_zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Tom
Soon I will be submitting a set of patches to provide initial support for the zoom2. Zoom2 is new target similar to the omap3_zoom1 target. Here is a product link. http://www.logicpd.com/products/development-kits/texas-instruments-zoom%E2%84%A2-omap34x-ii-mdp A stable u-boot for this target exis

[U-Boot] ZOOM2 patches and more patches

2009-04-01 Thread Tom
Sorry for the double errr triple patch submission. Blame the fool, Tom ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb

2009-04-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 08:48:51AM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote: > I also vote for moving _ALL_ the drivers (i2c, usb, net, etc.) to > appropriate directories under drivers/ no matter architecture specific they > are or not. Seconded. The criteria should generally be whether the code interacts with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add initial support for Zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:11:09AM -0500, Tom Rix wrote: > +#define WRITE_NAND_COMMAND(d, adr)\ > + writel(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_cmd) > +#define WRITE_NAND_ADDRESS(d, adr)\ > + writel(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_adr) > +#define WRITE_NAND(d, adr) writew(d, &nand_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Kim Phillips
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:06:27 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > -#if (CONFIG_NUM_CPUS > 1) > -void cpu_mp_lmb_reserve(struct lmb *lmb) > +int cpu_reset(int nr) > +{ > + volatile immap_t *immr = (immap_t *)CONFIG_SYS_IMMR; > + volatile ccsr_pic_t *pic = &immr->im_pic; blank line here > + out_

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
* Use CONFIG_MP instead of CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match 85xx * Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper. We'll need this to address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so other u-boot code doesn't use it.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] 85xx: Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper.

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
Match determine_mp_bootpg() that was added for 86xx. We need this to address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so other u-boot code doesn't use it. Also added a comment about how cpu_reset() is dealing

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] 85xx/86xx: Ensure MP boot page is not used

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
We had a bug on 86xx in which the boot page used to bring up secondary cores was being overwritten and used for the malloc region in u-boot. We need to reserve the region of memory that the boot page is going to be put at so nothing uses it. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala Acked-by: Becky Bruce --- *

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
The following changes since commit 2344bb8de2354101a8264c2123303c9d8d2aed3c: Detlev Zundel (1): inka4x0: Use proper accessor macros for memory mapped registers. are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85xx.git master Becky Bruce (1): mpc8641hpcn/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:06:27 -0500 > Kumar Gala wrote: > >> -#if (CONFIG_NUM_CPUS > 1) >> -void cpu_mp_lmb_reserve(struct lmb *lmb) >> +int cpu_reset(int nr) >> +{ >> +volatile immap_t *immr = (immap_t *)CONFIG_SYS_IMMR; >> +volatile ccsr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

2009-04-01 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Markus Rathgeb wrote: > An undocumented register? Are the specifications not released for the > series <= r700? But I have to confess to never read the specifications > of ATI/AMD. > > Have you found something? I'm not aware of a released TRM for RV280. And after successful video BIOS run the vid

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add initial support for Zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rix, In message <1238602273-27252-1-git-send-email-tom@windriver.com> you wrote: > Zoom2 is a new board from Texas Instruments and LogicPD > This is the product description > http://www.logicpd.com/products/development-kits/texas-instruments-zoom%E2%84%A2-omap34x-ii-mdp > > This patc

Re: [U-Boot] ZOOM2 patches and more patches

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message <49d3c288.6060...@windriver.com> you wrote: > Sorry for the double errr triple patch submission. > Blame the fool, Please make sure to number your patches, so it is clear in which order these should be applied (especially when you send the patches unthreaded like the f

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add support for debug board detection.

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rix, In message <1238602273-27252-3-git-send-email-tom@windriver.com> you wrote: > https://omapzoom.org/gf/project/omapzoom/wiki/?pagename=GettingStartedWithZoomII_AKA_OMAP34XII_MDP > > The zoom2 has an auxillary board that contains the serial, net, jtag and > battery simulator. Thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add serial support.

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rix, In message <1238602273-27252-4-git-send-email-tom@windriver.com> you wrote: > Zoom2 serial is in general supplied by one of the 4 UARTS on the debug board. > The default serial is from the USB connector on left side of the debug board. > The USB connector will produce 2 of the 4

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] 86xx: Cleanup MP support

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
* Use CONFIG_MP instead of CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match 85xx * Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper. We'll need this to address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so other u-boot code doesn't use it.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/3] 85xx: Introduce determine_mp_bootpg() helper.

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
Match determine_mp_bootpg() that was added for 86xx. We need this to address a bug introduced in v2009.03 with 86xx MP booting. We have to make sure to reserve the region of memory used for the MP bootpg() so other u-boot code doesn't use it. Also added a comment about how cpu_reset() is dealing

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] 85xx/86xx: Ensure MP boot page is not used

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
We had a bug on 86xx in which the boot page used to bring up secondary cores was being overwritten and used for the malloc region in u-boot. We need to reserve the region of memory that the boot page is going to be put at so nothing uses it. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala Acked-by: Becky Bruce --- *

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git (updated)

2009-04-01 Thread Kumar Gala
(for got to add include/asm-ppc/mp.h, now fixed) The following changes since commit 2344bb8de2354101a8264c2123303c9d8d2aed3c: Detlev Zundel (1): inka4x0: Use proper accessor macros for memory mapped registers. are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rtc: remove broken rtc_read and rtc_write declarations

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim Phillips, In message <20090330142805.a8919572.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote: > commit 04e11cf3 "rtc: add support for 4543 RTC (manufactured by e.g. > EPSON)" introduces the following build error on boards configuring e.g, > the ds1374 rtc: > > Configuring for MPC837XEMDS board...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add serial support.

2009-04-01 Thread Tom
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rix, > > In message <1238602273-27252-4-git-send-email-tom@windriver.com> you > wrote: > >> Zoom2 serial is in general supplied by one of the 4 UARTS on the debug board. >> The default serial is from the USB connector on left side of the debug board. >> The U

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git (updated)

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > (for got to add include/asm-ppc/mp.h, now fixed) > > The following changes since commit 2344bb8de2354101a8264c2123303c9d8d2aed3c: > Detlev Zundel (1): > inka4x0: Use proper accessor macros for memory mapped registers. > > are available in the g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ZOOM2 Add initial support for Zoom2

2009-04-01 Thread Tom
Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:11:09AM -0500, Tom Rix wrote: > >> +#define WRITE_NAND_COMMAND(d, adr)\ >> +writel(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_cmd) >> +#define WRITE_NAND_ADDRESS(d, adr)\ >> +writel(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_adr) >> +#define WRITE_N

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Noisily disable the legacy NAND subsystem.

2009-04-01 Thread Scott Wood
Legacy NAND is marked for feature removal after April 2009 (i.e. this upcoming release). There are still several boards that reference it (though many do so only for disk-on-chip support which has been silently disabled for a while now). These boards will now fail to build with The plan is to re

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-i2c.git

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <49d1c208.7000...@denx.de> you wrote: > > The following changes since commit 2344bb8de2354101a8264c2123303c9d8d2aed3c: > Detlev Zundel (1): > inka4x0: Use proper accessor macros for memory mapped registers. > > are available in the git repository at: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Noisily disable the legacy NAND subsystem.

2009-04-01 Thread Becky Bruce
On Apr 1, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > Legacy NAND is marked for feature removal after April 2009 (i.e. this > upcoming release). There are still several boards that reference it > (though many do so only for disk-on-chip support which has been > silently > disabled for a while now).

  1   2   >