Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-26 Thread Marek Vasut
On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:33:56 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: > >> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > On 0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-26 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: >> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Stefano & Marek, >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > >> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >>> Dear Stefano & Marek, > >>> > >>> can you please provide the request

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-23 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Stefano & Marek, >>> >>> can you please provide the requested information? >> >> Hi Scott, >> >>> In message <4e7a4145.30...@freesca

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-22 Thread Marek Vasut
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Stefano & Marek, > > > > can you please provide the requested information? > > Hi Scott, > > > In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > >>> In message <4e

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-22 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Stefano & Marek, > > can you please provide the requested information? > > Hi Scott, > In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: >> >>> In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: Is this hardware going

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-21 Thread Marek Vasut
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:16:35 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Stefano & Marek, > > can you please provide the requested information? > > In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > > > In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > >> Is this hardware goin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefano & Marek, can you please provide the requested information? In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > > > In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: > >> > >> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice if we > >> could keep this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-21 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/21/2011 02:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: >> >> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice if we >> could keep this code in sync. > > Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice if we > could keep this code in sync. Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, so yes, this hardware going to be supported in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-21 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/11/2011 11:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Don't allocate NAND buffers as one block, but allocate them separately. This > allows systems where DMA to buffers happen to allocate these buffers properly > aligned. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Scott Wood > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Wolfgang

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-11 Thread Marek Vasut
Don't allocate NAND buffers as one block, but allocate them separately. This allows systems where DMA to buffers happen to allocate these buffers properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Scott Wood Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Detlev Zundel --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation

2011-09-08 Thread Marek Vasut
Don't allocate NAND buffers as one block, but allocate them separately. This allows systems where DMA to buffers happen to allocate these buffers properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Scott Wood Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Detlev Zundel --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c