On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: >> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: >>>> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>>> Dear Stefano & Marek, >>>>> >>>>> can you please provide the requested information? >>>> >>>> Hi Scott, >>>> >>>>> In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: >>>>>>> In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: >>>>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice >>>>>>>> if we could keep this code in sync. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, >>>>>>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have >>>>>> an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. >>>> >>>> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html >>>> >>>> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Stefano >>> >>> Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience >>> measure now. I don't need to for mx28. >> >> Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then. > > Very well then, mind merging the rest then ?
Yes, I'll try to get to it soon. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
