On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Stefano & Marek, >>> >>> can you please provide the requested information? >> >> Hi Scott, >> >>> In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: >>>>> In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: >>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice if >>>>>> we could keep this code in sync. >>>>> >>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, >>>>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. >>>> >>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? >>>> >>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have an >>>> explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. >> >> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html >> >> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. >> >> Best regards, >> Stefano > > Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience > measure > now. I don't need to for mx28. >
Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
