On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Stefano & Marek, > > > > can you please provide the requested information? > > Hi Scott, > > > In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > >>> In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: > >>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice if > >>>> we could keep this code in sync. > >>> > >>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, > >>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. > >> > >> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? > >> > >> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have an > >> explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. > > I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html > > However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. > > Best regards, > Stefano
Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience measure now. I don't need to for mx28. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
