On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > >> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >>> Dear Stefano & Marek, > >>> > >>> can you please provide the requested information? > >> > >> Hi Scott, > >> > >>> In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > >>>>> In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: > >>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice > >>>>>> if we could keep this code in sync. > >>>>> > >>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, > >>>>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. > >>>> > >>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have > >>>> an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. > >> > >> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html > >> > >> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Stefano > > > > Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience > > measure now. I don't need to for mx28. > > Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then.
Very well then, mind merging the rest then ? Cheers > > -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
