On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:33:56 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: > >> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > >>>> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >>>>> Dear Stefano & Marek, > >>>>> > >>>>> can you please provide the requested information? > >>>> > >>>> Hi Scott, > >>>> > >>>>> In message <4e7a4145.30...@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > >>>>>>> In message <4e7a320d.1030...@freescale.com> you wrote: > >>>>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice > >>>>>>>> if we could keep this code in sync. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK > >>>>>>> board, so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline > >>>>>>> Linux, too. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else > >>>>>> have an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. > >>>> > >>>> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: > >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html > >>>> > >>>> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Stefano > >>> > >>> Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience > >>> measure now. I don't need to for mx28. > >> > >> Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then. > > > > Very well then, mind merging the rest then ? > > Yes, I'll try to get to it soon.
Thanks Scott, and thanks for your patience while reviewing, I know I had my moments where I wasn't too nice / was whiny ;-) Cheers > > -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
