Hi Minkyu,
> Dear Lukasz,
>
> On 4 October 2012 18:27, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> > ---
> > include/configs/trats.h |6 +-
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/configs/trat
Dear Minkyu and Joonyoung,
> -Original Message-
> From: Minkyu Kang [mailto:proms...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 7:26 AM
> To: Joonyoung Shim
> Cc: Piotr Wilczek; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Kyungmin Park
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] EXYNOS: Add Exynos4 I2C spacing
>
> De
On 12 October 2012 14:55, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 07:36:20 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:45:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 06:51:30PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Tom,
>> > >
>> > > The follo
On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Albert,
>
> On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
>> u-boot-arm/master.
>>
>> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
>> b
Dear Albert,
On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
> u-boot-arm/master.
>
> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactl
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 07:36:20 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:45:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 06:51:30PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d
Hi all,
I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
u-boot-arm/master.
This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of
the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:45:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 06:51:30PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > The following changes since commit
> > 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad:
> >
> > arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (201
Hi Albert,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:50:23 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:16:16 +0900, Minkyu Kang
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Albert,
> >
> > The following changes since commit 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad:
> >
> > arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-u
On 10/11/2012 08:30 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> But, yes, it bears more thinking if we want the next branch open for
>> longer than it has historically been, if we want that. And we have at
>> least historically been saying that next can and will be rebased.
>
> IMHO it would be nice for the next br
Dear Joonyoung,
On 12 October 2012 12:29, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/10/12 Minkyu Kang :
>> Dear Piotr and Joonyoung,
>>
>> On 11 October 2012 17:14, Piotr Wilczek wrote:
>>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>>
-Original Message-
From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofm...@gmail.com]
Sen
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/input/i8042.c b/drivers/input/i8042.c
> index c3bc536..99254e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/i8042.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/i8042.c
> @@ -607,11 +607,10 @@ static void kbd_led_set(void)
>
> static int kbd_input_
Hi,
2012/10/12 Minkyu Kang :
> Dear Piotr and Joonyoung,
>
> On 11 October 2012 17:14, Piotr Wilczek wrote:
>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofm...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:11 AM
>>> To: Piotr Wilczek
>>> Cc: u-boot@list
Dear Lukasz,
On 4 October 2012 18:27, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> ---
> include/configs/trats.h |6 +-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/trats.h b/include/configs/trats.h
> in
Dear Piotr and Joonyoung,
On 11 October 2012 17:14, Piotr Wilczek wrote:
> Hi Joonyoung,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:11 AM
>> To: Piotr Wilczek
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Kyungmin Park
>> Subject: Re: [
Dear Tom Rini,
> The SPI flash is not properly detected by plain "sf probe" due to
> it being located on different bus and different chipselect. Fix
> this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Stefano Babic
> Cc: Tom Rini
[...]
Please apply for .10 release, this is an important bugfi
From: Xiangfu
The JZ4740 CPU can load 8KB from two different addresses:
1. the normal area up to 8KB starting from NAND flash address 0x
2. the backup area up to 8KB starting from NAND flash address 0x2000
After create u-boot-spl.bin. it needs those 4 commands create final
From: Xiangfu
JZ4740 CPU have a internal ROM have such kind of code, that make
JZ4740 can boot from USB
usbboot.S can downloads user program from the USB port to internal
SRAM and branches to the internal SRAM to execute the program
Signed-off-by: Xiangfu
---
board/qi/qi_lb60/qi_lb60-
From: Xiangfu
Big thanks to Tom Rini and Daniel Schwierzeck for feedback.
V5:
* use puts instread of serial_puts (enable CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)
* update my email address
* fix compiles warnings
V4:
* split to 2 patches (nand spl/usbbot)
* remove use define string.c using CONFIG
The SPI flash is not properly detected by plain "sf probe" due to
it being located on different bus and different chipselect. Fix
this problem.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Cc: Stefano Babic
Cc: Tom Rini
---
include/configs/m28evk.h |8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-
From: Hung-Te Lin
To support Non-ASCII keys (ex, Fn, PgUp/Dn, arrow keys, ...), we need to
translate key code into escape sequence.
(Updated by s...@chromium.org to move away from a function to store
keycodes, so we can easily record how many were sent. We now need to
return this from input_send
From: Marc Jones
The i8042 keyboard reset was not checking the results of the output
buffer after the reset command. This can jam up some KBC/keyboards.
Also, remove a write to the wrong register and the CONFIG setting
around the incorrect write.
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones
Signed-off-by: Simon G
From: Gabe Black
This change adds a board overridable function which can be used to decide
whether or not to initialize the i8042 keyboard controller. On systems where
it isn't actually connected to anything, this can save a significant amount of
boot time.
On Stumpy, this saves about 200ms on b
From: Louis Yung-Chieh Lo
The BIOS leaves the keyboard enabled during boot time so that any
keystroke would interfere kernel driver initialization.
Add a way to disable the keyboard to make sure no scancode will be
generated during the boot time. Note that the keyboard will be
re-enabled again a
From: Gabe Black
On x86, the i8042 keyboard controller driver frequently waits for the keyboard
input buffer to be empty to make sure the controller has had a chance to
process the data it was given. The way the delay loop was structured, if the
controller hadn't cleared the corresponding status
Hi Graham,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Simon G
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Simon Glass,
>>>
>>> In message <1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org>
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Simon Glass,
>>
>> In message <1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote:
>>> This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsig
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message <1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote:
>> This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others.
>> Change x86 to be consistent.
>
> Given the limited rang
On 10/11/2012 06:37:40 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:21:28 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Extended-Asm
> >
> > "If your assembler instructions access memory in an unpredictable
> > fashion, add `memory' to the list
This prints a tftp speed indication after the download completes. This
is the 3.6 MiB/s indicator below.
Tegra2 (SeaBoard) # tftp ...
Using asx0 device
TFTP from server 172.22.72.144; our IP address is 172.22.73.81
Filename '/tftpboot/uImage-user-seaboard-1'.
Load address: 0x408000
Loading: ##
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:21:28 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> > Scott, I think you should not mistake as condescension what is just
> > humo(u)r. What I wrote above is a quotation from a (light, quite
> > humorous and above all, self-mocking) movie, meant to be read by, but
> > in
> > no w
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:27:09AM +0200, stefano babic wrote:
[snip]
> One reason to move into the board directory is that there was a decision
> to move rules related to only one arch or SOC where they belong to, that
> is in the corresponding arch/ or board/ directory.
I'll admit that maybe my
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:09:28 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 03:01:32 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Thanks for your example.
> >
> > > My understanding of gcc is that global memory accesses are meant to
> > > stay on the correct side of an asm with a "memory
Am Freitag, den 05.10.2012, 14:58 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek:
> Just remove ancient code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
> ---
> arch/microblaze/include/asm/byteorder.h | 23 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include
Am Freitag, den 05.10.2012, 14:58 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek:
> ext2_find_next_zero_bit must be also static if __swab32 is also static.
>
> Warning:
> include/asm/bitops.h:369:22: warning: '__fswab32' is static but
> used in inline function 'ext2_find_next_zero_bit'
> which is not static [enabled
Am 11/10/2012 22:33, schrieb Troy Kisky:
> On 10/11/2012 4:11 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Does it work something more direct (I have not tested, really...) ?
>>
>> In board Makefile, for example board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite, a rule for
>> the imximage file:
>>
>> $(CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG):
>> $(CC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/12 20:19, Xiangfu Liu wrote:
> Hi Tom Rini
>
> I cannot easy find a way to use 'puts' instead 'serial_puts' in my
> code. any advise will be great.
You should be able to use CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT without
CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK and get
On 10/11/2012 03:01:32 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your example.
> My understanding of gcc is that global memory accesses are meant to
> stay on the correct side of an asm with a "memory" clobber. The gcc
> manual states that if you use a memory clobber, the asm should also
>
On 10/11/2012 4:11 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Does it work something more direct (I have not tested, really...) ?
In board Makefile, for example board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite, a rule for
the imximage file:
$(CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG):
$(CC) -E -x c $< -I./include -o $@
And let unchanged in the
On 10/11/2012 03:03:29 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:03:13 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 12:31:46 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:44:29 +0200, Marek Vasut
wrote:
> >
> > > Add memory barrier to cache invalidate
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:03:13 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 12:31:46 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:44:29 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> > > Add memory barrier to cache invalidate and flush calls.
> >
> > Memory barrier...
> >
> >
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your example.
> My understanding of gcc is that global memory accesses are meant to
> stay on the correct side of an asm with a "memory" clobber. The gcc
> manual states that if you use a memory clobber, the asm should also
> be volatile.
Not exactly. It states that you n
Hi Stephen,
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:59:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like
> {fat,ext2}{ls,load},
> and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily
> be
> extended to other filesystem types; I on
Hi Tom,
The following changes since commit 221953d41dea8dce027b9ce6beee700d97ac2c83:
Prepare v2012.10-rc2 (2012-10-01 09:41:10 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-staging.git ag...@denx.de-next
Simon Glass (6):
bootstage: Export bootstage_add_record
On 10/11/2012 01:45:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:13:33 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> FWIW I think putting policy documents in a wiki, without any
> guidance on who's supposed to edit it or how changes get approved,
is a
> bad idea. Why not put policy documents
From: Stephen Warren
Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load},
and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily be
extended to other filesystem types; I only didn't do it for zfs because
I don't have any filesystems of that type to test with.
Si
From: Stephen Warren
This makes the FAT and ext4 filesystem implementations build if
CONFIG_FS_{FAT,EXT4} are defined, rather than basing the build on
whether CONFIG_CMD_{FAT,EXT*} are defined. This will allow the
filesystems to be built separately from the filesystem-specific commands
that use t
From: Stephen Warren
fs/Makefile is unused. The top-level Makefile sets LIBS-y += fs/xxx and
hence causes make to directly descend two directory levels into each
individual filesystem, and it never descends into fs/ itself.
So, delete this useless file.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
v2: No
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 06:51:30PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> The following changes since commit
> 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad:
>
> arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (2012-10-05
> 21:24:22 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:13:33 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> FWIW I think putting policy documents in a wiki, without any
> guidance on who's supposed to edit it or how changes get approved, is a
> bad idea. Why not put policy documents in the git-managed source
> tree? And changes
On 10/11/2012 12:27:57 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/12 10:16, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren
>>>
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:26:45 -0600, Stephen Warren
wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:16 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Re committer identity, I don'
On 10/11/2012 12:16:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > > Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with "by"
> > tags, and
> > > > especially with Singed-off-by, since t
On 10/11/2012 12:31:46 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:44:29 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add memory barrier to cache invalidate and flush calls.
Memory barrier...
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
means." :)
Could we wait on the
On 10/10/2012 07:26:50 AM, randriamanjaka franky wrote:
Hi,
The u-boot on my board freescale P1010RDB is erased.There was a
problem when i want to reflash it.
Is there a tool from freescale to put the first u-boot from nand on
my board freescale P1010RDB ?
Is there a bootable image in
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:40:08 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:09:59 +0200, Lukasz Dalek
> wrote:
>
> > Define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX to use ffuart as default console and fix
> > compilation error related to undefined CONFIG_CONS_INDEX.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luk
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:05:37 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 10/11/12 09:57, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/11/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>> From: Stephen Warren
> >>
> >>> Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like
> >>> {fat,ext2}{
Hi Lukasz,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:09:59 +0200, Lukasz Dalek
wrote:
> Define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX to use ffuart as default console and fix
> compilation error related to undefined CONFIG_CONS_INDEX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dalek
> ---
> include/configs/h2200.h |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/12 10:16, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren
>>> wrote:
>> [snip]
The problem with reba
On 10/11/2012 11:16 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with "by"
>>> tags, and
> especially with Singed-off-by, sin
On 10/11/2012 11:16 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
...
>> In the case of post-v2012.10, it will be rebased as we want the commit
>> to change how
>> ARM and unaligned accesses are handled to be the firs
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > > Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with "by"
> > tags, and
> > > > especially with Singed-off-by, since the sign-off is not and must
> > not
> > > > be
On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
[snip]
> > The problem with rebasing when pulling is that git commit IDs
change,
> > so it's much more difficult to determine wh
From: Haiying Wang
Starting from QMan3.0, the QMan clock cycle needs be exposed so that the kernel
driver can use it to calculate the shaper prescaler and rate.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c |4
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c |5 +
arch/pow
From: Haiying Wang
Because QMan3.0 and BMan2.1 used ip_cfg in ip_rev_2 register to differ the
total portal number, buffer pool number etc, we can use this info to limit
those resources in kernel driver.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/portals.c | 13 +++--
1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/12 09:57, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Warren
>>
>>> Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like
>>> {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparen
On 10/11/2012 01:19 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
> In message <5075f48a.2080...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>
>> I believe that's (part of) why Linux is tending towards pull requests of
>> a (signed) tag rather than a branch, since the tag always points at a
>> specific commit,
On 10/11/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren
>
>> Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like
>> {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system.
>> This scheme could easily be extended to other filesystem typ
On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with "by"
tags, and
> > especially with Singed-off-by, since the sign-off is not and must
not
> > be related to the committer of the patch, but to its author(s).
>
> At least the way the L
On 10/11/2012 01:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
> In message <50759a75.8060...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>
>> Do note that linux-next doesn't become the next Linux kernel version
>> either; it's just a preview of the merges Linus will do. Linus re-does
>> all the merges base
Hi Tom,
The following changes since commit
28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad:
arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (2012-10-05
21:24:22 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm master
for you to fetch changes up to 9b5dba537473578153
Hi Minkyu,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:16:16 +0900, Minkyu Kang
wrote:
> Dear Albert,
>
> The following changes since commit 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad:
>
> arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (2012-10-05 21:24:22
> +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like
> {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system.
> This scheme could easily be extended to other filesystem ty
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
[snip]
> > The problem with rebasing when pulling is that git commit IDs change,
> > so it's much more difficult to determine when a commit is merged into
> > a parent tree; o
Hi Scott,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:02:18 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
> Ideally once a pull request happens the pull happens quickly. If that
> doesn't happen, you could reply to the pull request asking that it be
> ignored in favor of a new pull request, or create a new temporary
> branch. IM
On 10/11/2012 04:01:27 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
On 10/11/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time
following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in
AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're running
Hi Stephen,
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:05:07 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like
> {fat,ext2}{ls,load},
> and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily
> be
> extended to other filesystem types; I only didn't do it for zfs
> b
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:19:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
> In message <5075f48a.2080...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
> >
> > I believe that's (part of) why Linux is tending towards pull requests of
> > a (signed) tag rather than a branch, since the tag always points at
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:44:29 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Add memory barrier to cache invalidate and flush calls.
>
> Memory barrier...
>
> "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
> means." :)
>
> A memory barrier's effect is
Am 10/10/2012 04:03, schrieb Troy Kisky:
> On 10/8/2012 6:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 04/10/2012 03:47, Troy Kisky wrote:
>>> The '#' used as comments in the files cause the preprocessor
>>> trouble, so change to /* */.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
>>> ---
>> Hi Troy,
>>
>>> Makefile
On 10/11/12 02:03, Simon Glass wrote:
> This prints a tftp speed indication after the download completes. This
> is the 3.6 MiB/s indicator below.
>
> To enable this, define CONFIG_TFTP_SPEED in your board config.
This is relatively small (and nice) addition to the tftpboot command.
Do we really
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:17:46 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Am 11/10/2012 05:58, schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> > From: Fabio Estevam
> >
> > mx25pdk has a SD/MMC slot connected to esdhc1.
> >
> > Add support for it and allow the environment variables to be saved
> > into SD/MMC.
> >
> > Signed-
Hi Stephen,
> >> It provides documentation in the git history of when merges were made,
> >> and what the source of the merge was (at least using the remote name
> >> that the merger has configured, which is better than nothing).
> >
> > This is what it provides, but this does not tell me why it
On 10/11/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time
following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in
AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're running from?
The behaviour of overlapping TLB entries is un
On 10/11/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time
following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in
AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're running from?
The behaviour of overlapping TLB entries is unde
Hi Wolfgang,
On Oct 11, 2012 6:32 PM, "Wolfgang Denk" wrote:
>
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message <1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote:
> > This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others.
> > Change x86 to be consistent.
>
> Given the limited range f
Hi Joonyoung,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:11 AM
> To: Piotr Wilczek
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Kyungmin Park
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] EXYNOS: Add Exynos4 I2C spacing
>
> Hi, Protr.
>
> 2012/9/24 P
This processor, though very similar to other members of the
PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
yet another feature set than any supported sibling.
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c |1 +
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c
Add support for the new kmvect1 board powered by the mpc8309 processor.
As this board is very similar to the existing suvd3, instead of adding a
new config header file, just add a new config option to suvd3.h
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto
---
boards.cfg |3 ++-
include/configs
Add support for Keymile boards based on mpc8309
(it would be only kmvect1 for now)
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto
---
board/keymile/km83xx/km83xx.c |2 +-
include/configs/km/km8309-common.h | 176
include/configs/km/km83xx-common.h |6 ++
3 fil
simplify #if defined(CONFIG_MPC8360) || defined(CONFIG_MPC832x)
for qe variables
with #if defined(CONFIG_QE)
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c b/arch
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto
---
include/configs/km/km8321-common.h |2 +-
include/configs/suvd3.h|4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/km/km8321-common.h
b/include/configs/km/km8321-common.h
index 580b72f..8ad6fc3 100644
-
Introduce a new configuration token CONFIG_MPC830x to be shared among
mpc8308 and mpc8309. Define it for existing 8308 boards, and refactor
existing common code so to make future introduction of 8309 simpler.
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c |3 +++
a
This patch series adds support for VECT1, an mpc8309-powered Keymile board.
MPC8309 is not currently supported by u-boot, so we first add support for
this processor.
VECT1 is somewhat similar to suvd3, albeit powered by a different processor,
so we use its config file as opposed to introducing a ne
Am 05/10/2012 10:16, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
> Now it is possible to provide specific function per PMIC/power
> device instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - New at patch v2
> ---
Hi Lucasz,
> include/power/battery.h | 38 +++
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Vadim Bendebury
>
> This prevents the preprocessor from complaining when processing
> variadic macros
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
>
> board/chromebook-x86/coreboot/config.mk | 37
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Gabe Black
>
> U-boot needs a host controller or "hose" to interact with the PCI busses
> behind them. This change installs a host controller during initialization of
> the coreboot "board" which implements some of X86's basi
Dear Simon Glass,
In message <1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote:
> This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others.
> Change x86 to be consistent.
Given the limited range for this variable it makes no sense to use a
long for this. Please fix this t
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
