Dear Albert, On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of > u-boot-arm/master. > > This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request > being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of > the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from > previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive > testing from Tom. > > Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform > and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal > master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d. > > All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please > rework this request to take this rollback into account. > > Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master > back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of > course the choice is yours. >
OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday. Is it OK? Thanks. Minkyu Kang. -- from. prom. www.promsoft.net _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
