Hi, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Graeme Russ <graeme.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: >>> Dear Simon Glass, >>> >>> In message <1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote: >>>> This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others. >>>> Change x86 to be consistent. >>> >>> Given the limited range for this variable it makes no sense to use a >>> long for this. Please fix this the other way round, i. e. change the >>> architectures that use a long. >> >> OK I will send out a series that changes them to unsigned long. > > Should we just change them all to u32 to be clear on the value range?
Sorry, I meant unsigned int. Are there architectures in U-Boot which use a 16-bit int? Regards, Simon > > Regards, > > Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
