On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang <proms...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Albert, > > On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of >> u-boot-arm/master. >> >> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request >> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of >> the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from >> previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive >> testing from Tom. >> >> Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform >> and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal >> master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d. >> >> All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please >> rework this request to take this rollback into account. >> >> Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master >> back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of >> course the choice is yours. >> > > OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday.
sorry. spi, not i2c. > Is it OK? -- from. prom. www.promsoft.net _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
