> >>> +#define CONFIG_IPADDR192.168.5.44
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.5.30
> >>> +#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
> >>>
> >> please remove the IP params
> >>
> > Why ?
> >
> >
> Because these values are only relevant to your lab networ
hi remy
with your help, i have add my code to uboot and the probe can work. but
i still have some questions.
1. After probe, in kernel, i will wait the interrupt generated by insert
usb cable , but in uboot, we don`t have interrupt, so how do you deal with
it.
2009/4/18 Remy Bohmer
> Hel
I was hoping that I could use that to test some NAND code, but
then I noticed it wasn't implemented. I would have expected that
U-Boot command wouldn't exist until they're implemented...
I'm hoping someone has an implementation. With at least these
characteristics:
- Doesn't toggle the same bi
Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Dear Jon Smirl,
>>
>> In message <9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com> you
>> wrote:
>>
> - for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
> probably wih an initial
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> - for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
>> >> probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (c
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> >> - for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
> >> probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case
> >> insensitive) of the board name.
> >>
> >> like this:
Dear Sascha,
In message <20090421223025.ga21...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> s...@octopus:~/octopus/u-boot/u-boot find board -name "flash.c" | wc -l
> 201
> s...@octopus:~/octopus/u-boot/u-boot find board -name "config.mk"| wc -l
> 411
>
> So nearly half of the boards in U-Boot seem to be unmai
On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar,
>
> In message acf6ca567...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong
>>> list
>>> with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need
>>> sum
>>> gro
Dear Kumar,
In message you wrote:
>
> > I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong list
> > with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need sum
> > grouping / structuring.
> >
> > IMHO there should be several options:
> >
> > - for those who look for a b
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Dear Kumar Gala,
>>
>> In message <93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org> you
>> wrote:
>>>
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
>>>
>>> So bac
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Sascha,
>
> In message <20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
> >
> > > This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
> > > lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Sascha,
>
> In message <20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
> >
> > > This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
> > > lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:38:21PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Ladislav Michl wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 08:27:34PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>> Just to get an idea of the math:
>>>
>>> CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ is 1200 (12MHz)? This is divided by 256, so
>>> TIMER_CLOCK is 46875Hz? A free r
Let CONFIG_SYS_HZ to have value of 1000 effectively fixing all users of
get_timer.
Changes since original version:
* Set PTV=2 (divisor 8) for boards using 12MHz timer clock source to
improve timer resolution.
Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl
diff --git a/cpu/arm925t/interrupts.c b/cpu/arm925t/i
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3-
> cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>>
>>> In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
>>
>> So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long
Dear Amandeep,
In message <3d083b80904211200h413b85dfv253e4990b9456...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Another question - How can I boot from this USB key. Can I put Debian 5.0
> Lenny image on USB key and boot AT91SAM9263-EK from there? If yes, how would
> I do it? I am new to Linux. Many thanks
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>
> > In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
>
> So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long
> list of board names?
I'm not an expert for the capabiliti
Hi,
I am having a hard time understanding how the uboot relocation from flash to
RAM happens. I'm trying to follow the code flow. I "think" I understand it,
but wanted to run it by you experts to confirm.
The flow starts in cpu/arm926ejs/start.s. In the reset function, after
cpu_init_crit, u_boot
Hello,
2009/4/21 Amandeep Bhullar :
> Thanks for replying, Remy. I appreciate it. I just downloaded, built and
> used U-boot version 2009.03. It does see the USB key now.
as expected ;-)
> U-Boot> usb start
> (Re)start USB...
> USB: scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
> sc
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message
> <9e4733910904210841n6c7f0db5s57eee23520dc...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
>> in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pre
Dear Sascha,
In message <20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> > This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
> > lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations,
> > but I consider it a bad idea to not provide a reasonable migration
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910904210841n6c7f0db5s57eee23520dc...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
> in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
> from the accompanying packaging/manuals who the vendo
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910904210833u79f3d4dfv2db7449162462...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Jon Smirl,
> >
> > In message <9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com>
> you wrote:
> >>
> >> Everyone will k
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:04 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
>
> Dear Premi,
>
> Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> >>
Dear Premi,
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Premi, Sanjeev
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:37 PM
To: 'Dirk Behme'
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be.
Thanks for replying, Remy. I appreciate it. I just downloaded, built and
used U-boot version 2009.03. It does see the USB key now.
U-Boot> usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB: scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
scanning bus for storage devices... 1 Storage Device(s) found
Anoth
> -Original Message-
> From: Premi, Sanjeev
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:37 PM
> To: 'Dirk Behme'
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.c
Hello,
> I am using Atmel AT91SAM9263-EK and running u-boot 1.1.5, it fails to
> recognize a USB key of size 1GB and formatted in FAT.
Yep, known problem.
> This is what is happening:
> U-boot> usb start
> (Re)start USB...
> USB: scanning bus for devices...
> USB device not responding, gi
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:26 PM
>> To: Premi, Sanjeev
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
>>
>> Dear Premi,
>>
>> Sanj
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Robert,
>
> just to put a few points right:
>
> In message <20090421070431.gx5...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
> >
> > So our intention was and is:
> >
> > 1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect thi
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:26 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
>
> Dear Premi,
>
> Sanjeev Premi wrote:
> > The func
Dear Premi,
Sanjeev Premi wrote:
> The function display_board_info() displays the silicon
> revision as 2 - based on the return value from get_cpu_rev().
>
> This is incorrect as the current Si version is 3.1
Thanks for the patch and fixing this!
> This patch displays the correct version; but d
Steve,
Steve Sakoman wrote:
> I'm attempting to enable the smc911x driver for the overo omap3 board.
>
> Looking at the README and a couple of board config files, it seems
> that defining CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X, CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_16_BIT (or
> 32_BIT), and CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_BASE is all that
The function display_board_info() displays the silicon
revision as 2 - based on the return value from get_cpu_rev().
This is incorrect as the current Si version is 3.1
This patch displays the correct version; but does not
change get_cpu_rev() to minimize the code impact.
Signed-off-by: Sanjeev P
Jon Smirl wrote:
> My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
> in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
> from the accompanying packaging/manuals who the vendor is.
Companies and product lines get bought, names change...
IMHO, architecture (s
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910904201712x68658ddfk3c18298deb82b...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> There are a lot of boards that could be moved into a vendor subdirs. I
>> suspect we have less than 100 vendors. Maybe as few as
Dear Ladis,
Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 08:27:34PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Dear Ladis,
>>
>> ah, and some remarks on the patch itself ;)
>
> Thanks, I'm glad someone still cares about ancient stuff.
>
>> Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>> Let CONFIG_SYS_HZ to have value of 1000 ef
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
>
> Really? So who is the board vendor for the MPC8360 board
In recent U-Boot mmcinit changed to mmc init.
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme
---
include/configs/omap3_beagle.h |2 +-
include/configs/omap3_evm.h |2 +-
include/configs/omap3_overo.h |2 +-
include/configs/omap3_pandora.h |2 +-
include/configs/om
From: Manikandan Pillai
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme
Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai
---
Changes in v3 which replaces previous version [3]:
* Fix udelay(), too
* Fix and use TIMER_LOAD_VAL macro
* Rebase against mainline 7ee38c044ca5041d3378d6507580ea4ec344af96
'fix DaVinci NS16550_REG_SIZE reg
> So should we leave the nomadik as a single-entry vendor board
> or leave it as is?
Argh!
I mean: leave it alone in its own vendor-dir or move it up one level?
I got the idea vendor dirs were preferred anyway (as suggested by JC),
but Wolfgang's last message suggests the opposite.
Sorry for mis
I'm attempting to enable the smc911x driver for the overo omap3 board.
Looking at the README and a couple of board config files, it seems
that defining CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X, CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_16_BIT (or
32_BIT), and CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_BASE is all that is required. I
have also enabled CON
Dear Wolgang Denk,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Gerrit Van Damme,
In message <49ed809d.5030...@mgb-tech.com> you wrote:
The saveenv command doesn't work for me because then the default env
variables are stored and this is what I want to avoid.
Then change the environment before running
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > 1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
> >political position because it is a *good* one.
>
> This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
> lutionary path - this may in
> There is many vendors which have just a single board;
Like the ST nomadik8815 I maintain.
> Just adding an additional directory level for a single entry does
> not make much sense to me.
So should we leave the nomadik as a single-entry vendor board
or leave it as is? (more nomadik boards will
Dear Gerrit Van Damme,
In message <49ed809d.5030...@mgb-tech.com> you wrote:
>
> The saveenv command doesn't work for me because then the default env
> variables are stored and this is what I want to avoid.
Then change the environment before running saveenv? Or even better -
adjust the default e
Dear Robert,
just to put a few points right:
In message <20090421070431.gx5...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> So our intention was and is:
>
> 1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
>political position because it is a *good* one.
This is not quite correct.
> -Original Message-
> From: saschaha...@web.de [mailto:saschaha...@web.de]on Behalf Of Sascha
> Hauer
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:57 PM
> To: Bill Cook
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Build errors u-boot-v2 iMX27
>
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:57:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910904201712x68658ddfk3c18298deb82b...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> There are a lot of boards that could be moved into a vendor subdirs. I
> suspect we have less than 100 vendors. Maybe as few as 60.
There is many vendors which have just a single board; also,
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
Really? So who is the board vendor for the MPC8360 board? Freescale or
Logic PD? And who is the vendor for the ADS5121? Fre
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:28:34AM -0700, Ben Warren wrote:
> > > Anyway, you shouldn't rely on this. I'm the original author of this
> > > driver, but I do not use U-Boot-v1 anymore, so I can't tell if this
> > > breaks something or not.
> >
> > No problem. I just Cc'ed all email addresses I could
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > > If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
> > > hardware
The size of U-Boot binary for MPC8360ERDK increased
(> 2 flash sectors now), so 'saveenv' will partially
overwrite U-Boot in flash and will brick the board.
This patch moves environment offset to fourth flash
sector.
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin
---
include/configs/MPC8360ERDK.h |2 +-
Hi
I am using Atmel AT91SAM9263-EK and running u-boot 1.1.5, it fails to
recognize a USB key of size 1GB and formatted in FAT.
This is what is happening:
U-boot> usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB: scanning bus for devices...
USB device not responding, giving up (status=20)
2 USB Device(s) f
Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala
>> wrote:
>>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala
wrote:
> In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we sh
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
> > hardware.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer
>
> Acked-by: S
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
> hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
> Cc: Sascha Hauer
Acked-by: Sascha Hauer
Anyway, you shouldn't rely on this. I'm the original author of this
driver,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
> Cc: Sascha Hauer
ping.
> ---
> drivers/net/smc911x.c |9 +++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> index 30f2dc2
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:57:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Not if the MAC is stored in the volatile smc911x registers. Issuing a
> > soft reset flushes these values - if U-Boot does that, the OS has no
> > change getting them.
>
> then either your u-boot or your OS is misconfigured and yo
Hi eija_flight,
> I am using GCC inline assembly in standalone applications to access my cpu
> (ppc) internal registers. And it seems some of the registers were needed by
> U-boot to run, because when I am accessing some of these registers via
> standalone applications, the board will go reset or
Dear Sir/Madam
My regard to you, Well am Larry Bills and i will like to know if
you do have
plywood box in stock for sale or may i know if i can place and order for me
newly company
in Ghana which is Macdan wood shop 0233 Nima Ghana and also i will like to know
the method of payment
Hello Drasko,
>> Great. Maybe you want to post your patches so others can benefit from
>> that acchievement, too?
> It will be my pleasure, so I will take a look how can I make a usefull patch
> as soon as I clean the code.
I am very interested in your work on this subject. If you want, I can
hel
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2009 11:46:22 Gerrit Van Damme wrote:
I've copied a flash image of one board to another one and changed the
ethaddr (environment variable)
of course when I start Uboot now the system says: CRC bad, using default
environment variables.
Now what I would
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> What ever will happen - I don't see *any* reason for whatever Mike is trying
> to enforce here.
I don't see how Mike is trying to nor can enforce anything like that. He's a
single person expressing his views.
But I do second the notion that good id
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:29:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> [stupid attempt of a flame war deleted]
For the audience which is wondering about what's going on here, I have
no idea.
The idea behind B-Boot-v2 is: U-Boot itself is a *great* bootloader from
the user's poing of view. It is the be
65 matches
Mail list logo
