On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Kumar Gala <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Kumar Gala, >> >> In message <[email protected]> you >> wrote: >>> >>>> In my experience, I tend to search for board names first. >>> >>> So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long >>> list of board names? >> >> I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong list >> with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need sum >> grouping / structuring. >> >> IMHO there should be several options: >> >> - for those who look for a board name, we should support this, >> probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case >> insensitive) of the board name. >> >> like this: => board name => M => MPC837XERDB
You can search for the board name in Kconfig using Ctrl-F and then put in a string This works on the kernel too. >> >> - alternatively, it should be possible to restrict the choice by >> selecting first processor architecture (ARM, PowerPC, MIPS, ...), >> then CPU (family) name, then board names. >> >> like this: => Architecture => PPC => MPC83xx => MPC837XERDB > > I vote for the second one. > > Now I'll ask what the location of "defconfig"s should be? > > - k > -- Jon Smirl [email protected] _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
